World Journal of Surgery

, Volume 42, Issue 5, pp 1304–1311 | Cite as

Transabdominal Pre-Peritoneal Versus Open Repair for Primary Unilateral Inguinal Hernia: A Meta-analysis

  • James J. Wu
  • Joshua A. Way
  • Guy D. Eslick
  • Michael R. Cox
Original Scientific Report

Abstract

Background

Recent NICE guidelines recommend open surgical approaches for the treatment of primary unilateral inguinal hernias. However, many surgeons perform a laparoscopic approach based on the advantages of less post-operative pain and faster recovery. Our aim was to examine current evidence comparing transabdominal pre-peritoneal (TAPP) laparoscopic repair and open surgical repair for primary inguinal hernias.

Methods

A systematic search of six electronic databases was conducted for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing TAPP and open repair for primary unilateral inguinal hernia. A random-effects model was used to combine the data.

Results

A total of 13 RCTs were identified, with 1310 patients receiving TAPP repair and 1331 patients receiving open repair. There was no significant difference between the two groups for rates of haematoma (RR 0.92; 95% CI 0.49–1.71; P = 0.78), seroma (RR 1.90; 95% CI 0.87–4.14; P = 0.10), urinary retention (RR 0.99; 95% CI 0.36–2.76; P = 0.99), infection (RR 0.61; 95% CI 0.29–1.28; P = 0.19), and hernia recurrence (RR 0.67; 95% CI 0.42–1.07; P = 0.10). TAPP repair had a significantly lower rate of paraesthesia (RR 0.20; 95% CI 0.08–0.50; P = 0.0005), shorter bed stay (2.4 ± 1.4 vs 3.1 ± 1.6 days, P = 0.0006), and shorter return to normal activities (9.5 ± 7.9 vs 17.3 ± 8.4 days, P < 0.00001).

Conclusions

Our findings demonstrated that TAPP repair did not have higher rate of morbidity or hernia recurrence and is an equivalent approach to open repair, with the advantages of faster recovery and reduced paraesthesia.

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Human and animal rights

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animal performed by any of the authors.

Supplementary material

268_2017_4288_MOESM1_ESM.docx (13 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 12 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Jenkins JT, O’Dwyer PJ (2008) Inguinal hernias. BMJ 336(7638):269–272CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kingsnorth A, LeBlanc K (2003) Hernias: inguinal and incisional. Lancet 362(9395):1561–1571CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2016) NICE technology appraisal guidance no. 83: laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernia repairGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Anand A, Sinha PA, Kittappa K, Mulchandani MH, Debrah S, Brookstein R (2011) Review of inguinal hernia repairs by various surgical techniques in a district general hospital in the UK. Indian J Surg 73(1):13–18CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pahwa HS, Kumar A, Agarwal P, Agarwal AA (2015) Current trends in laparoscopic groin hernia repair: a review. World J Clin Cases 3(9):789–792CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Amid PK (2005) Groin hernia repair: open techniques. World J Surg 29(8):1046–1051. doi: 10.1007/s00268-005-7967-x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Watson A, Ziprin P, Chadwick S (2006) TAPP repair for inguinal hernia: a new composite mesh technique. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 88(7):678CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Berndsen F, Arvidsson D, Enander LK, Leijonmarck CE, Wingren U, Rudberg C, Smedberg S, Wickbom G, Montgomery A (2002) Postoperative convalescence after inguinal hernia surgery: prospective randomized multicenter study of laparoscopic versus shouldice inguinal hernia repair in 1042 patients. Hernia 6(2):56–61CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Carter J, Duh QY (2011) Laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernias. World J Surg 35(7):1519–1525. doi: 10.1007/s00268-011-1030-x CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bhandarkar DS, Shankar M, Udaadia TE (2006) Laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernia: current status and controversies. J Minim Access Surg 2(3):178–186CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA Group (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med 151(4):264–269CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG (2003) Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 327(7414):557–560CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Abbas AE, Abd Ellatif ME, Noaman N, Negm A, El-Morsy G, Amin M, Moatamed A (2012) Patient-perspective quality of life after laparoscopic and open hernia repair: a controlled randomized trial. Surg Endosc 26(9):2465–2470CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Anadol ZA, Ersoy E, Taneri F, Tekin E (2004) Outcome and cost comparison of laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair versus open Lichtenstein technique. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 14(3):159–163CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gong K, Zhang N, Lu Y, Zhu B, Zhang Z, Du D, Zhao X, Jiang H (2011) Comparison of the open tension-free mesh-plug, transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP), and totally extraperitoneal (TEP) laparoscopic techniques for primary unilateral inguinal hernia repair: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 25(1):234–239CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Juul P, Christensen K (1999) Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 86(3):316–319CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lawrence K, McWhinnie D, Goodwin A, Doll H, Gordon A, Gray A, Britton J, Collin J (1995) Randomised controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open repair of inguinal hernia: early results. BMJ 311(7011):981–985CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tanphiphat C, Tanprayoon T, Sangsubhan C, Chatamra K (1998) Laparoscopic vs open inguinal hernia repair. A randomized, controlled trial. Surg Endosc 12(6):846–851CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zieren J, Zieren HU, Jacobi CA, Wenger FA, Müller JM (1998) Prospective randomized study comparing laparoscopic and open tension-free inguinal hernia repair with Shouldice’s operation. Am J Surg 175(4):330–333CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wang WJ, Chen JZ, Fang Q, Lin JF, Jin PF, Li ZT (2013) Comparison of the effects of laparoscopic hernia repair and Lichtenstein tension-free hernia repair. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 23(4):301–305CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Dirksen CD, Beets GL, Go PM, Geisler FE, Baeten CG, Kootstra G (1998) Bassini repair compared with laparoscopic repair for primary inguinal hernia: a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Surg 164(6):439–447CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Khan N, Babar TS, Ahmad M, Ahmad Z, Shah LA (2013) Outcome and cost comparison of laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair versus open Lichtenstein technique. J Postgrad Med Inst 27(3):310–316Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Butters M, Redecke J, Koninger J (2007) Long-term results of a randomized clinical trial of Shouldice, Lichtenstein and transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair. Br J Surg 94(5):562–565CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    O’Reilly EA, Burke JP, O’Connell PR (2012) A meta-analysis of surgical morbidity and recurrence after laparoscopic and open repair of primary unilateral inguinal hernia. Ann Surg 255(5):846–853CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Arvidson D, Berndsen FH, Larsson LG, Leijonmarck CE, Rimbäck G, Rudberg C, Smedberg S, Spangen L, Montgomery A (2005) Randomized clinical trial comparing 5-year recurrence rate after laparoscopic versus Shouldice repair of primary inguinal hernia. Br J Surg 92(9):1085–1091CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Klinge U, Klosterhalfen B, Müller M, Ottinger AP, Schumpelick V (1998) Shrinking of polypropylene mesh in vivo: an experimental study in dogs. Eur J Surg 164(12):965–969CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    El-Dhuwaib Y, Corless D, Emmett C, Deakin M, Slavin J (2013) Laparoscopic versus open repair of inguinal hernia: a longitudinal cohort study. Surg Endosc 27(3):936–945CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Schmedt CG, Sauerland S, Bittner R (2005) Comparison of endoscopic procedures vs Lichtenstein and other open mesh techniques for inguinal hernia repair: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Surg Endosc 19(2):188–199CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Bracale U, Melillo P, Pignata G, Di Salvo E, Rovani M, Merola G, Pecchia L (2012) Which is the best laparoscopic approach for inguinal hernia repair: TEP or TAPP? A systematic review of the literature with a network meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 26(12):3355–3366CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Choi YY, Kim Z, Hur KY (2012) Learning curve for laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal repair of inguinal hernia. Can J Surg 55(1):33–36CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Dallas KB, Froylich D, Choi JJ, Risa JH, Lo C, Colon MJ, Telem DA, Divino CM (2013) Laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair in octogenarians: a follow-up study. Geriatr Gerontol Int 13(2):329–333CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Mui WL, Ng CS, Fung TM, Cheung FK, Wong CM, Ma TH, Bn MY, Ng EK (2006) Prophylactic ilioinguinal neurectomy in open inguinal hernia repair: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 244(1):27–33CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    McCormack K, Scott NW, Go PM, Ross S, Grant AM, EU Hernia Trialists Collaboration (2003) Laparoscopic techniques versus open techniques for inguinal hernia repair. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1:CD001785Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Leibl BJ, Däubler P, Schmedt CG, Kraft K, Bittner R (2000) Long-term results of a randomized clinical trial between laparoscopic hernioplasty and shouldice repair. Br J Surg 87(6):780–783CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • James J. Wu
    • 1
  • Joshua A. Way
    • 1
  • Guy D. Eslick
    • 1
    • 2
  • Michael R. Cox
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Sydney Medical SchoolThe University of SydneySydneyAustralia
  2. 2.The Whiteley-Martin Research CentreNepean HospitalPenrithAustralia

Personalised recommendations