Advertisement

World Journal of Surgery

, Volume 42, Issue 1, pp 239–245 | Cite as

Intracorporeal Traction of the Rectum with a Beaded Plastic Urinary Drainage Bag Hanger: Comparison with Conventional Laparoscopic Rectal Cancer Surgery

  • Sang Woo Lim
  • Hyeong Rok Kim
  • Young Jin KimEmail author
Innovative Surgical Techniques Around the World

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery with proper total mesorectal excision is a challenge for colorectal surgeons during trouble shooting. We used a beaded plastic urinary drainage bag hanger to encircle the rectum and clamp laparoscopic rectal transaction in this study.

Methods

Sixty-three patients with rectal cancer underwent laparoscopic radical rectal resection with curative intent between February 2015 and December 2015. Plastic beaded form urinary Foley catheter bag hanger was inserted intracorporeally via right lower 12-mm trocar, encircling the rectal tube distal to the rectal lesion followed by fastening. Thirty patients in the rectal resection group (28 laparoscopic, 2 robotic-assisted) using the commercial beaded plastic hanger for Foley catheter drainage were compared to 33 patients who underwent conventional laparoscopic rectal resection.

Results

Low anterior resection was performed for both groups. The Foley bag hanger group had less operation time (162.6 min vs. 187.3 min, p = 0.006) and fewer numbers of stapler cartilage (1.6 vs. 2.1, p = 0.001).

Conclusions

Intracorporeal ligation of the rectum with a beaded plastic Foley catheter bag hanger could be used as a valuable method for rectal handling and transaction in laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery.

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Dr. Lim Sang Woo, Dr. Kim Hyeong Rok, and Dr. Kim Young Jin have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material 1 (MP4 19026 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Jayne DG, Thorpe HC, Copeland J, Quirke P, Brown JM, Guillou PJ (2010) Five-year follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of laparoscopically assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 97(11):1638–1645. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7160 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kang SB, Park JW, Jeong SY, Nam BH, Choi HS, Kim DW, Lim SB, Lee TG, Kim DY, Kim JS, Chang HJ, Lee HS, Kim SY, Jung KH, Hong YS, Kim JH, Sohn DK, Kim DH, Oh JH (2010) Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): short-term outcomes of an open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 11(7):637–645. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70131-5 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Park JS, Choi GS, Kim SH, Kim HR, Kim NK, Lee KY, Kang SB, Kim JY, Kim BC, Bae BN, Son GM, Lee SI, Kang H (2013) Multicenter analysis of risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic rectal cancer excision: the Korean laparoscopic colorectal surgery study group. Ann Surg 257(4):665–671. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31827b8ed9 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lim SW, Huh JW, Kim YJ, Kim HR (2013) Vertical transumbilical incision versus left lower transverse incision for specimen retrieval during laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Tech Coloproctol 17(1):59–65. doi: 10.1007/s10151-012-0883-9 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chung CC, Kwok SP, Leung KL, Lau WY, Li AK (1997) Use of a cotton tape tie in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Aust N Z J Surg 67(5):293–294CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Matsumoto A, Arita K, Tashiro M, Usui S, Takiguchi N, Hiranuma S (2008) The simple “Rectum Catcher” device is a useful tool for laparoscopic-assisted high and lower rectal surgery. Surg Endosc 22(8):1905–1909. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-9954-4 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Matsumoto A, Arita K (2016) Laparoscopic-assisted rectal surgery for rectal cancer using the simple rectum catcher device with an intraoperative colonoscopy: results of our hospital study in 203 patients. Ann Surg Oncol 23(12):3941–3947. doi: 10.1245/s10434-016-5442-610.1245/s10434-016-5442-6 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kuroyanagi H, Oya M, Ueno M, Fujimoto Y, Yamaguchi T, Muto T (2008) Standardized technique of laparoscopic intracorporeal rectal transection and anastomosis for low anterior resection. Surg Endosc 22(2):557–561. doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9626-9 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Park SJ, Choi SI, Lee SH, Lee KY (2010) Endo-satinsky clamp for rectal transection during laparoscopic total mesorectal excision. Dis Colon Rectum 53(3):355–359. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181c388e9 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bulut O (2013) Ligation of the rectum with an extracorporeal sliding knot facilitating laparoscopic cross-stapling: a procedure revisited. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 23(11):938–941. doi: 10.1089/lap.2013.0064 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sang Woo Lim
    • 1
    • 2
  • Hyeong Rok Kim
    • 1
  • Young Jin Kim
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Colon and Rectal SurgeryChonnam National University Hwasun HospitalJeollanam-doSouth Korea
  2. 2.Department of SurgeryHallym University Sacred Heart HospitalAnyangKorea

Personalised recommendations