World Journal of Surgery

, Volume 41, Issue 9, pp 2224–2230 | Cite as

Comparison of Epidemiology of the Injuries and Outcomes in Two First-Level Trauma Centers in Colombia Using the Pan-American Trauma Registry System

  • Anu Ramachandran
  • Anju Ranjit
  • Cheryl K. Zogg
  • Juan P. Herrera-Escobar
  • Jessica R. Appelson
  • Luis F. Pino
  • Michel B. Aboutanous
  • Adil H. HaiderEmail author
  • Carlos A. Ordonez
Original Scientific Report



The aim of this study was to compare the epidemiology of traumatic injuries and mortality outcomes between two tertiary-care trauma centers in Colombia using data from Pan-American Trauma Registry (PATR).


January 1–December 31, 2012, data from the Hospital Universitario del Valle (HUV, public) and Fundacion Valle del Lili (FVL, private) in Cali, Colombia, were considered. Differences in demographic and clinical information were compared using descriptive statistics. Propensity score matching was used to match patients on age, gender, and ISS. Within matched cohorts, multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess for differences in in-hospital mortality, further adjusting for insurance type, employment, heart rate, presence of hypotension (SBP < 90), and GCS score.


HUV (8539; 78% male) and FVL (10,456; 60% male) had a combined total of 18,995 trauma cases in 2012 with comparable mean ages of 29.7 years. There were significant differences in insurance status, injury severity, and mechanism of injury between patients at HUV and FLV. On risk-adjusted logistic regression analyses with propensity score matched cohorts, the odds of death in HUV was higher compared to patients presenting at FVL hospital (OR [95% CI]:4.93 [3.37–7.21], p < 0.001).


The study established the utility of the PATR and revealed important trends in patient demographics, injury epidemiology, and mortality outcomes, which can be used to target trauma initiatives throughout the region. It underscores the profound importance that differences in case mix play in the risk of trauma-related mortality, further emphasizing the need to monitor and evaluate unique aspects of trauma in LMIC.

Level of evidence



Propensity Score Glasgow Coma Scale Injury Severity Score Trauma Care Glasgow Coma Scale Score 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

No disclosures relevant to this work.


  1. 1.
    World Health Organization (2010) Injuries and violence: the facts. World Health Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mathers CD, Loncar D (2006) Projections of global mortality and burden of disease from 2002 to 2030. PLoS Med. 3(11):2011–2030. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0030442 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Aboutanos MB, Mora F, Rodas E et al (2010) Ratification of IATSIC/WHO’s guidelines for essential trauma care assessment in the South American region. World J Surg 34(11):2735–2744. doi: 10.1007/s00268-010-0716-9 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fraade-Blanar L, Concha-Eastman A, Baker T (2007) Injury in the Americas: the relative burden and challenge. Pan Am J Public Heal 22(3):254–259. doi: 10.1590/S1020-49892007000900005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ordóñez CA, Pino LF, Tejada JW et al. (2012) Experience of two first level hospitals in the southwest region of Colombia on the implementation of the Panamerican Trauma Society International Trauma Registry. Rev Col Bras Cir 39(4):255–262.
  6. 6.
    Hoffman K, Cole E, Playford ED, Grill E, Soberg HL, Brohi K (2014) Health outcome after major trauma: what are we measuring? PLoS ONE 9(7):e103082. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0103082 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hofman K, Primack A, Keusch G, Hrynkow S (2005) Addressing the growing burden of trauma and injury in low- and middle-income countries. Am J Public Health 95(1):13–17. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.039354 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Moore L, Clark DE (2008) The value of trauma registries. Injury 39(6):686–695. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2008.02.023 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jurkovich G, Mock C (1999) Systematic review of trauma system effectiveness based on registry comparisons. J Trauma Inj Infect Crit Care 47(3 Suppl):S46–S55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Haider AH, Hashmi ZG, Gupta S et al (2014) Benchmarking of trauma care worldwide: the potential value of an International Trauma Data Bank (ITDB). World J Surg 38(8):1882–1891. doi: 10.1007/s00268-014-2629-5 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Guerrero R, Gallego AL, Becerril-Montekio V, Vasques J (2011) Sistema de salud de Colombia. Salud Publica de Mexico 53(S2):144–155Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dozier KC, Miranda MA, Kwan RO, Cureton EL, Sadjadi J, Victorino GP (2010) Insurance coverage is associated with mortality after gunshot trauma. J Am Coll Surg 210:280CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Haas JS, Goldman L (1994) Acutely injured patients with trauma in Massachusetts: differences in care and mortality by insurance status. Am J Public Health 84:1605CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Falor A, Kim D, Bricker S et al (2014) Insurance status predicts survival for trauma patients undergoing urgent intervention. J Surg Res 188(1):238–242CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Andreuccetti G et al (2012) A review of emergency room studies on alcohol and injuries conducted in Latin America and the Caribbean region. Drug Alcohol Rev 31:737–746CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rehm J, Taylor B, Room R (2006) Global burden of disease from alcohol, illicit drugs, and tobacco. Drug Alcohol Rev 25(6):503–513CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Seow E, Wong HP, Phe A (2001) The pattern of ambulance arrivals in the emergency department of an acute care hospital in Singapore. Emerg Med J 18(4):297–299CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Haddon W (1980) Advances in the epidemiology of injuries as a basis for public policy. Public Health Rep 95(5):411–421PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Haider AH, Hashmi ZG, Zafar SN et al (2014) Developing best practices to study trauma outcomes in large databases: an evidence-based approach to determine the best mortality risk adjustment model. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 76(4):1061–1069CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Arreola-Risa C, Mock C, Lojero-Wheatly L et al (2000) Low-cost improvements in prehospital trauma care in a Latin American City. J Trauma Inj Infect Crit Care 48(1):119–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Haider AH, David J-S, Zafar SN et al (2013) Comparative effectiveness of in hospital trauma resuscitation at a French trauma center and matched patients treated in the United States. Ann Surg 258(1):178–183. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31828226b6 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anu Ramachandran
    • 1
  • Anju Ranjit
    • 2
  • Cheryl K. Zogg
    • 3
  • Juan P. Herrera-Escobar
    • 2
  • Jessica R. Appelson
    • 2
  • Luis F. Pino
    • 4
  • Michel B. Aboutanous
    • 5
  • Adil H. Haider
    • 2
    Email author
  • Carlos A. Ordonez
    • 4
    • 6
  1. 1.Johns Hopkins School of MedicineBaltimoreUSA
  2. 2.Department of Surgery, Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women’s HospitalHarvard Medical School and Harvard School of Public HealthBostonUSA
  3. 3.Yale School of MedicineNew HavenUSA
  4. 4.Department of Surgery from Division of Trauma and Acute Care SurgeryHospital Universitario del Valle, Universidad del ValleCaliColombia
  5. 5.Division of Acute Care Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University Trauma CenterVirginia Commonwealth University Medical CenterRichmondUSA
  6. 6.Department of Surgery From Division of Trauma and Acute Care SurgeryFundación Valle del LiliCaliColombia

Personalised recommendations