Advertisement

World Journal of Surgery

, Volume 41, Issue 8, pp 2078–2086 | Cite as

Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding: Predictive Factors for Weight Loss and Band Removal After More than 10 Years’ Follow-Up in a Single University Unit

  • Pasquale Tammaro
  • Boris Hansel
  • Andrea Police
  • Marina Kousouri
  • Christophe Magnan
  • Jean Pierre Marmuse
  • Konstantinos ArapisEmail author
Original Scientific Report

Abstract

Background

Weight loss and overall outcomes following laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) are more variable than with other bariatric procedures. Our aim was to investigate the predictive value of certain parameters in a cohort of 794 patients with 10 years’ minimum follow-up after LAGB.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the records of 794 patients undergoing LAGB performed by the authors between April 1996 and December 2004. We collected patients’ data on weight loss and band-related complications and performed logistic regression modelling and calculated Kaplan–Meier curves for band preservation.

Results

The follow-up rate at 10 years was 90.4%. The mean follow-up duration was 15.1 years (range, 120–228 months). Overall band removal with or without conversion or replacement was required in 304 (38.2%) patients. The mean survival time of the band was 148.4 months (95% confidence interval: 138.3–167.4), and there was no difference in the rate of removal by operative technique (p = 0.7). The highest rate of band removal occurred in female patients (p = 0.05), those with BMI > 50 kg/m2 (p = 0.005) and in those <40 years of age (p = 0.04). For patients with the band in situ, the success rate was significantly lower in patients with initial BMI > 50 kg/m2. Conversely, differences in success rate were not statistically significant for age (using 50 years as the cut-off), technique or sex.

Conclusions

Higher rates of removal occurred in women, younger patients and those with BMI > 50 kg/m2. Regardless of these criteria, the rate of band removal for complications rose over time. Patients should be informed of the high risk of the need for band removal long-term.

Keywords

Body Mass Index Sleeve Gastrectomy Gastric Banding Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding Bulimia Nervosa 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Drs. Tammaro P., Hansel B., Police A., Kousouri M., Magnan C., Marmuse J.P. and Arapis K. have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

References

  1. 1.
    Belachew M, Legrand M, Vincenti VV et al (1995) Laparoscopic placement of adjustable silicone gastric band in the treatment of morbid obesity: How to do it. Obes Surg 5:66–70CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Buchwald H, Avidor Y, Braunwald E et al (2004) Bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 292:1724–1737CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Weiner R, Bockhorn H, Rosenthal R, Wagner D (2001) A prospective randomized trial of different laparoscopic gastric banding techniques for morbid obesity. Surg Endosc 15:63–68CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rubin M, Spivak H (2003) Prospective study of 250 patients undergoing laparoscopic gastric banding using the two-step technique: a technique to prevent postoperative slippage. Surg Endosc 17:857–860CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Busetto L, Segato G, De Marchi F et al (2002) Outcome predictors in morbidly obese recipients of an adjustable gastric band. Obes Surg 12:83–92CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dixon JB, Dixon ME, O’Brien PE (2001) Pre-operative predictors of weight loss at 1-year after Lap-Band surgery. Obes Surg 11:200–207CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Branson R, Potoczna N, Brunotte R et al (2005) Impact of age, sex and body mass index on outcomes at four years after gastric banding. Obes Surg 15:834–842CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Biertho L, Steffen R, Ricklin T et al (2003) Laparoscopic gastric bypass versus laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: a comparative study of 1,200 cases. J Am Coll Surg 197:536–544; discussion 544–535Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chau WY, Schmidt HJ, Kouli W et al (2005) Patient characteristics impacting excess weight loss following laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. Obes Surg 15:346–350CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bueter M, Thalheimer A, Lager C et al (2007) Who benefits from gastric banding? Obes Surg 17:1608–1613CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wolnerhanssen BK, Peters T, Kern B et al (2008) Predictors of outcome in treatment of morbid obesity by laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: results of a prospective study of 380 patients. Surg Obes Relat Dis 4:500–506CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kasza J, Brody F, Vaziri K et al (2011) Analysis of poor outcomes after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. Surg Endosc 25:41–47CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Colquitt JL, Picot J, Loveman E, Clegg AJ (2009) Surgery for obesity. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD003641Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gastrointestinal surgery for severe obesity (1992) National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement. Am J Clin Nutr 55:615S–619SGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Reinhold RB (1982) Critical analysis of long term weight loss following gastric bypass. Surg Gynecol Obstet 155:385–394PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chevallier JM, Paita M, Rodde-Dunet MH et al (2007) Predictive factors of outcome after gastric banding: a nationwide survey on the role of center activity and patients’ behavior. Ann Surg 246:1034–1039CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tice JA, Karliner L, Walsh J et al (2008) Gastric banding or bypass? A systematic review comparing the two most popular bariatric procedures. Am J Med 121:885–893CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Busetto L, Mozzi E, Schettino AM et al (2015) Three years durability of the improvements in health-related quality of life observed after gastric banding. Surg Obes Relat Dis 11:110–117CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zitsman JL, DiGiorgi MF, Fennoy I et al (2015) Adolescent laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB): prospective results in 137 patients followed for 3 years. Surg Obes Relat Dis 11:101–109CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    O’Brien PE, MacDonald L, Anderson M et al (2013) Long-term outcomes after bariatric surgery: fifteen-year follow-up of adjustable gastric banding and a systematic review of the bariatric surgical literature. Ann Surg 257:87–94CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Aarts EO, Dogan K, Koehestanie P et al (2014) Long-term results after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: a mean fourteen year follow-up study. Surg Obes Relat Dis 10:633–640CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kindel T, Martin E, Hungness E, Nagle A (2014) High failure rate of the laparoscopic-adjustable gastric band as a primary bariatric procedure. Surg Obes Relat Dis 10:1070–1075CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    O’Brien PE, Dixon JB, Laurie C, Anderson M (2005) A prospective randomized trial of placement of the laparoscopic adjustable gastric band: comparison of the perigastric and pars flaccida pathways. Obes Surg 15:820–826CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Trujillo MR, Muller D, Widmer JD et al (2016) Long-term follow-up of gastric banding 10 years and beyond. Obes Surg 26(3):581–587CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gero D, Dayer-Jankechova A, Worreth M et al (2014) Laparoscopic gastric banding outcomes do not depend on device or technique. Long-term results of a prospective randomized study comparing the Lapband (R) and the SAGB (R). Obes Surg 24:114–122CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Welch G, Wesolowski C, Piepul B et al (2008) Physical activity predicts weight loss following gastric bypass surgery: findings from a support group survey. Obes Surg 18:517–524CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Burgmer R, Grigutsch K, Zipfel S et al (2005) The influence of eating behavior and eating pathology on weight loss after gastric restriction operations. Obes Surg 15:684–691CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mifflin MD, St Jeor ST, Hill LA et al (1990) A new predictive equation for resting energy expenditure in healthy individuals. Am J Clin Nutr 51:241–247PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hudson JI, Hiripi E, Pope HG Jr, Kessler RC (2007) The prevalence and correlates of eating disorders in the national comorbidity survey replication. Biol Psychiatry 61:348–358CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Forsell P, Hallerback B, Glise H, Hellers G (1999) Complications following Swedish adjustable gastric banding: a long-term follow-up. Obes Surg 9:11–16CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    DeMaria EJ, Sugerman HJ, Meador JG et al (2001) High failure rate after laparoscopic adjustable silicone gastric banding for treatment of morbid obesity. Ann Surg 233:809–818CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    te Riele WW, Boerma D, Wiezer MJ et al (2010) Long-term results of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding in patients lost to follow-up. Br J Surg 97:1535–1540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Valle E, Luu MB, Autajay K et al (2012) Frequency of adjustments and weight loss after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. Obes Surg 22:1880–1883CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Himpens J, Cadiere GB, Bazi M et al (2011) Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. Arch Surg 146:802–807CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pasquale Tammaro
    • 1
  • Boris Hansel
    • 2
  • Andrea Police
    • 1
  • Marina Kousouri
    • 3
  • Christophe Magnan
    • 4
  • Jean Pierre Marmuse
    • 1
  • Konstantinos Arapis
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of General and Digestive SurgeryUniversity Hospital Bichat Claude BernardParisFrance
  2. 2.Team of Diabetes Vascular Complication Cordelier Recherche Center, Department of DiabetesNutrition Bichat-Claude Bernard University HospitalParisFrance
  3. 3.Centre of Recherche of Psychanalysis, Medecine and SocietyUniversity of Paris VIIParisFrance
  4. 4.Team REGLYS University of Paris-CNRS UMR8251ParisFrance

Personalised recommendations