Advertisement

World Journal of Surgery

, Volume 41, Issue 5, pp 1366–1374 | Cite as

Mechanical Bowel Preparation Does Not Affect Clinical Severity of Anastomotic Leakage in Rectal Cancer Surgery

  • Woong Bae Ji
  • Koo Yong Hahn
  • Jung Myun Kwak
  • Dong Woo Kang
  • Se Jin Baek
  • Jin Kim
  • Seon Hahn Kim
Original Scientific Report

Abstract

Background

Previous multicenter randomized trials demonstrated that omitting mechanical bowel preparation (MBP) did not increase anastomotic leakage rates or other infectious complications. However, the most serious concern regarding the omission of MBP is ongoing fecal peritonitis after anastomotic leakage occurs. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical manifestations and severity of anastomotic leakage between patients who underwent MBP and those who did not.

Methods

This study was a single-center retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database. From January 2006 to September 2013, 1369 patients who underwent elective rectal cancer resection with primary anastomosis were identified and analyzed.

Results

Anastomotic leakage rates were not significantly different between patients who did not undergo MBP (77/831, 9.27%) and those who did (42/538, 7.81%). However, a significantly lower rate of clinical leakage requiring surgical exploration was observed in the leakage without MBP group (30/77, 39.0%) compared with the leakage with MBP group (30/42, 71.4%) (P = 0.001). There were no significant differences in the clinical severity of anastomotic leakage as assessed by the length of hospital stay, time to resuming a normal diet, length of antibiotic use, ileus rate, transfusion rate, ICU admission rate, and mortality rate between the leakage without MBP and leakage with MBP groups.

Conclusion

MBP was not found to affect the clinical severity of anastomotic leakage in elective rectal cancer surgery.

Keywords

Anastomotic Leakage Familial Adenomatous Polyposis Clinical Severity Rectal Resection Rectal Cancer Surgery 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

This study was supported by a Korea University Grant. The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

References

  1. 1.
    Nichols RL, Condon RE (1971) Preoperative preparation of the colon. Surg Gynecol Obstet 132:323–337PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Duthie GS, Foster ME, Price-Thomas JM et al (1990) Bowel preparation or not for elective colorectal surgery. J R Coll Surg Edinb 35:169–171PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zmora O, Mahajna A, Bar-Zakai B et al (2003) Colon and rectal surgery without mechanical bowel preparation: a randomized prospective trial. Ann Surg 237:363–367PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bucher P, Gervaz P, Soravia C et al (2005) Randomized clinical trial of mechanical bowel preparation versus no preparation before elective left-sided colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 92:409–414CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fa-Si-Oen P, Roumen R, Buitenweg J et al (2005) Mechanical bowel preparation or not? Outcome of a multicenter, randomized trial in elective open colon surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 48:1509–1516CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ram E, Sherman Y, Weil R, Vishne T et al (2005) Is mechanical bowel preparation mandatory for elective colon surgery? A prospective randomized study. Arch Surg 140:285–288CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zmora O, Mahajna A, Bar-Zakai B et al (2006) Is mechanical bowel preparation mandatory for left-sided colonic anastomosis? Results of a prospective randomized trial. Tech Coloproctol 10:131–135CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Platell C, Barwood N, Makin G (2006) Randomized clinical trial of bowel preparation with a single phosphate enema or polyethylene glycol before elective colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 93:427–433CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Contant CM, Hop WC, van’t Sant HP et al (2007) Mechanical bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery: a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet 370:2112–2117CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jung B, Påhlman L, Nyström PO et al (2007) Mechanical bowel preparation study group. Multicentre randomized clinical trial of mechanical bowel preparation in elective colonic resection. Br J Surg 94:689–695CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pena-Soria MJ, Mayol JM, Anula-Fernandez R et al (2007) Mechanical bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery with primary intraperitoneal anastomosis by a single surgeon: interim analysis of a prospective single-blinded randomized trial. J Gastrointest Surg 11:562–567CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bretagnol F, Panis Y, Rullier E et al (2010) Rectal cancer surgery with or without bowel preparation: the French GRECCAR III multicenter single-blinded randomized trial. Ann Surg 252:863–868CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zmora O, Wexner SD, Hajjar L et al (2003) Trends in preparation for colorectal surgery: survey of the members of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons. Am Surg 69:150–154PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kang BM, Lee KY, Park SJ et al (2013) Mechanical bowel preparation and prophylactic antibiotic administration in colorectal surgery: a survey of the current status in Korea. Ann Coloproctol 29:160–166CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pittet O, Nocito A, Balke H et al (2015) Rectal enema is an alternative to full mechanical bowel preparation for primary rectal cancer surgery. Colorectal Dis 17:1007–1010CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rahbari NN, Weits J, Hohenberger W et al (2010) Definition and grading of anastomotic leakage following anterior resection of the rectum: a proposal by the International study group of rectal cancer. Surgery 147:339–351CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Güenaga KF, Matos D, Wille-Jørgensen P (2011) Mechanical bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 9:CD001544Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cao F, Li J, Li F (2012) Mechanical bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery: updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 27:803–810CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Van’t Sant HP, Weidema WF, Hop WC et al (2011) Evaluation of morbidity and mortality after anastomotic leakage following elective colorectal surgery in patients treated with or without mechanical bowel preparation. Am J Surg 202:321–324CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gubler G, Dincler S, Steurer J et al (2012) Outcome of anastomotic leakage after colorectal surgery in patients with or without preoperative mechanical bowel irrigation: an observational study. Surg Sci 3:105–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mahajna A, Krausz M, Rosin D et al (2005) Bowel preparation is associated with spillage of bowel contents in colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 48:1626–1631CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Schein M, Assalia A, Eldar S et al (1995) Is mechanical bowel preparation necessary before primary colonic anastomosis? An experimental study. Dis Colon Rectum 38:749–752CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Conrad JK, Ferry KM, Foreman ML et al (2000) Changing management trends in penetrating colon trauma. Dis Colon Rectum 43:466–471CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hsu TC (2005) Comparison of one-stage resection and anastomosis of acute complete obstruction of left and right colon. Am J Surg 189:384–387CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Slieker JC, van’t Sant HP, Vlot J et al (2011) Bowel preparation prior to laparoscopic colorectal resection: What is the current practice? J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 21:899–903CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Zmora O, Lebedyev A, Hoffman A et al (2006) Laparoscopic colectomy without mechanical bowel preparation. Int J Colorectal Dis 21:683–687CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Muzii L, Bellati F, Zullo MA et al (2006) Mechanical bowel preparation before gynecologic laparoscopy: a randomized, single-blind, controlled trial. Fertil Steril 85:689–693CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Morris CR, Harvey IM, Stebbings WS et al (2002) Epidemiology of perforated colonic diverticular disease. Postgrad Med J 78:654–658CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Vermeulen J, van der Harst E, Lange JF (2010) Pathophysiology and prevention of diverticulitis and perforation. Neth J Med 68:303–309PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Scarborough JE, Mantyh CR, Sun Z et al (2015) Combined mechanical bowel preparation reduces incisional surgical site infection and anastomotic leak rates after elective colorectal resection: an analysis of colectomy-targeted ACS NSQIP. Ann Surg 262:331–337CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ikeda A, Konishi T, Ueno M et al (2016) Randomized clinical trial of oral and intravenous versus intravenous antibiotic prophylaxis for laparoscopic colorectal resection. Br J Surg 103:1608–1615CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Woong Bae Ji
    • 1
  • Koo Yong Hahn
    • 2
  • Jung Myun Kwak
    • 3
  • Dong Woo Kang
    • 3
  • Se Jin Baek
    • 3
  • Jin Kim
    • 3
  • Seon Hahn Kim
    • 3
  1. 1.Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Korea University Ansan HospitalKorea University College of MedicineAnsan-siRepublic of Korea
  2. 2.Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Chungju HospitalKonkuk UniversityChungju-siRepublic of Korea
  3. 3.Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Korea University Anam HospitalKorea University College of MedicineSeoulRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations