Outcomes of Percutaneous Cholecystostomy for Acute Cholecystitis
- 677 Downloads
- 7 Citations
Abstract
Background
Acute cholecystitis (AC) is an important cause of emergency admissions among the elderly. The use of percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) as bridging therapy among high-risk patients is widely accepted. However, the use of PC as definitive treatment is controversial.
Aim
To determine the characteristics, clinical outcomes and predictors of recurrence of AC among patients who underwent PC.
Methods
A retrospective case series of 71 consecutive patients [73 (38–96) years, 43/71 males] treated with PC for AC at a tertiary hospital from 2007 to 2013, with data collected from case records.
Results
Patients were followed up for 37.0 (0.1–110.8) months after PC. Mortality rate was 8.5 % (6/71) during the index admission and 32.4 % (23/71) at the end of follow-up. Recurrence rate for AC was 11.9 % (7/59). Median time to recurrence was 62 (13–464) days. PC was definitive treatment in 33/59. Predictors of recurrence were higher serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP) at diagnosis (OR = 1.01, 95 % CI 1.00–1.02, p = 0.021) and acute myocardial infarction (AMI) during index admission (OR = 8.00, 95 % CI 1.19–54.0, p = 0.033). Fifteen patients (26.3 %, 15/71) had post-procedural complications including dislodgement (14 %, 10/71), tube obstruction (7.0 %, 5/71), bile leaks (2.8 %, 2/71), gallbladder perforation (1.4 %, 1/71), bowels perforation (1.4 %, 1/71) and severe post-procedural haemorrhage (1.4 %, 1/71).
Conclusion
PC is effective and relatively safe in high-risk patients with AC. However, patients with higher ALP or AMI during index admission have higher risk of recurrence and might benefit from definitive cholecystectomy.
Keywords
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Acute Myocardial Infarction Acute Cholecystitis Index Admission Acalculous CholecystitisNotes
Acknowledgments
Funding
There were no sources of funding used for research and/or publication.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
All authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- 1.Chang YR, Ahn YJ, Jang JY et al (2014) Percutaneous cholecystostomy for acute cholecystitis in patients with high comorbidity and re-evaluation of treatment efficacy. Surgery 155:615–622CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 2.Miura F, Takada T, Kawarada Y et al (2007) Flowcharts for the diagnosis and treatment of acute cholangitis and cholecystitis: Tokyo Guidelines. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 14:27–34CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 3.Kortram K, van Ramshorst B, Bollen TL et al (2012) Acute cholecystitis in high risk surgical patients: percutaneous cholecystostomy versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CHOCOLATE trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-7 PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 4.Hirota M, Takada T, Kawarada Y et al (2007) Diagnostic criteria and severity assessment of acute cholecystitis: Tokyo Guidelines. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 14:78–82CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 5.KDIGO (2012) Summary of recommendation statements. Kidney Inter Suppl 2:8–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Johansson M, Thune A, Blomqvist A et al (2003) Management of acute cholecystitis in the laparoscopic era: results of a prospective, randomized clinical trial. J Gastrointest Surg 7:642–645CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 7.Papi C, Catarci M, D’Ambrosio L et al (2004) Timing of cholecystectomy for acute calculous cholecystitis: a meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol 99:147–155CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 8.Okamoto K, Takada T, Strasberg SM et al (2013) TG13 management bundles for acute cholangitis and cholecystitis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 20:55–59CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 9.Gurusamy KS, Rossi M, Davidson BR (2013) Percutaneous cholecystostomy for high-risk surgical patients with acute calculous cholecystitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007088 Google Scholar
- 10.Horn T, Christensen SD, Kirkegard J et al (2015) Percutaneous cholecystostomy is an effective treatment option for acute calculous cholecystitis: a 10-year experience. HPB 17(4):326–331CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 11.Little MW, Briggs JH, Tapping CR et al (2013) Percutaneous cholecystostomy: the radiologist’s role in treating acute cholecystitis. Clin Radiol 68:654–660CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 12.Sanjay P, Mittapalli D, Marioud A et al (2013) Clinical outcomes of a percutaneous cholecystostomy for acute cholecystitis: a multicentre analysis. HPB 15:511–516CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 13.Hsieh YC, Chen CK, Su CW et al (2012) Outcome after percutaneous cholecystostomy for acute cholecystitis: a single-center experience. J Gastrointest Surg 16:1860–1868CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 14.Cha BH, Song HH, Kim YN et al (2014) Percutaneous cholecystostomy is appropriate as definitive treatment for acute cholecystitis in critically ill patients: a single center, cross-sectional study. Korean J Gastroenterol 63:32CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar