Advertisement

World Journal of Surgery

, Volume 40, Issue 7, pp 1737–1740 | Cite as

Is Early Reversal of Defunctioning Ileostomy a Shorter, Easier and Less Expensive Operation?

  • Konstantinos LasithiotakisEmail author
  • Assad Aghahoseini
  • David Alexander
Original Scientific Report

Abstract

Background

A defunctioning loop ileostomy mitigates the consequences of anastomotic leak from low rectal anastomosis but it is associated with significant morbidity. In this study, the outcome of early reversal of defunctioning ileostomy during the same admission with the primary operation was assessed.

Methods

This randomized study was carried out at York Teaching Hospital during the period 2003–2007. All patients with defunctioning ileostomy were considered for an early second operation if they had an uneventful recovery and were in good general condition. Patients on steroids, at high cardiorespiratory risk and those experiencing any postoperative complication were excluded. Eligible patients with satisfactory gastrografin enema on postoperative day 6 were randomized to early versus late reversal at 6–8 weeks. Outcome measures were ease of closure as assessed by a visual analog scale by the operating surgeon, all postoperative complications, duration of the operation, total length of hospital stay and associated costs.

Results

Thirty-nine consecutive patients were assessed for eligibility and finally 26 were included in the study. Sixteen patients underwent early reversal. The median(interquartile range (IQR)) age was 62(22) years. Early reversal was significantly superior in terms of ease of abdominal wall closure, ease of reversal (p < 0.01 each), duration of the operation (median(IQR) 20(13) vs. 40(9) min, p < 0.01) and costs of stoma care (median(IQR) 27(9) vs. 311(108) £, p < 0.01). There were no major (grade III/IV) complications in either group. Total length of hospital stay was similar between groups.

Conclusion

In carefully selected patients, early reversal of defunctioning ileostomy is feasible, technically easier and has shorter operative time which can also lead to significant cost savings.

Keywords

Anastomotic Leak Short Operative Time Parastomal Hernia Early Group Early Closure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Omundsen M, Hayes J, Collinson R et al (2012) Early ileostomy closure: is there a downside? ANZ J Surg 82:352–354CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alves A, Panis Y, Lelong B et al (2008) Randomized clinical trial of early versus delayed temporary stoma closure after proctectomy. Br J Surg 95:693–698CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bakx R, Busch OR, van Geldere D et al (2003) Feasibility of early closure of loop ileostomies: a pilot study. Dis Colon Rectum 46:1680–1684CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Menegaux F, Jordi-Galais P, Turrin N et al (2002) Closure of small bowel stomas on postoperative day 10. Eur J Surg 168:713–715CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Robertson I, Leung E, Hughes D et al (2005) Prospective analysis of stoma-related complications. Colorectal Dis 7:279–285CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bakx R, Busch OR, Bemelman WA et al (2004) Morbidity of temporary loop ileostomies. Dig Surg 21:277–281CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Neuman HB, Patil S, Fuzesi S et al (2011) Impact of a temporary stoma on the quality of life of rectal cancer patients undergoing treatment. Ann Surg Oncol 18:1397–1403CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hirst NA, Tiernan JP, Millner PA et al (2014) Systematic review of methods to predict and detect anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis 16:95–109CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jordi-Galais P, Turrin N, Tresallet C et al (2003) Early closure of temporary stoma of the small bowel. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 27:697–699PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Danielsen AK, Correa-Marinez A, Angenete E et al (2011) Early closure of temporary ileostomy—the EASY trial: protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open 1:e000162CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Robertson J, Linkhorn H, Vather R et al (2015) Cost analysis of early versus delayed loop ileostomy closure: a case-matched study. Dig Surg 32:166–172CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Konstantinos Lasithiotakis
    • 1
    Email author
  • Assad Aghahoseini
    • 1
  • David Alexander
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of General SurgeryYork Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation TrustYorkUK

Personalised recommendations