Advertisement

World Journal of Surgery

, Volume 40, Issue 6, pp 1429–1439 | Cite as

Anatomical Resection But Not Surgical Margin Width Influence Survival Following Resection for HCC, A Propensity Score Analysis

  • Jung-Woo LeeEmail author
  • Young-Joo LeeEmail author
  • Kwang-Min Park
  • Dae-Wook Hwang
  • Jae Hoon Lee
  • Ki Byung Song
Original Scientific Report

Abstract

Background

The effects of the surgical resection margin on the clinical outcomes in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cases remain controversial. The objective of this study was to further examine this issue.

Methods

The details of all HCC patients who underwent hepatectomy between December 1999 and December 2009 at the Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Asan Medical Center were analyzed retrospectively. We divided 1022 HCC patients into two groups according to the most significant surgical margin length. To overcome any bias due to differences in the distribution of covariates between the two groups, the patients were in a matched 1:1 ratio by propensity score analysis.

Results

A surgical margin ≤1 mm was identified as the most significant surgical margin in both disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) (p = 0.008 and p = 0.026, respectively). However, many clinicopathological factors were different between the resection margin ≤1 mm and >1 mm groups. To reduce these different clinicopathological factors, propensity score matching was performed using 21 selected factors. After matching, no significant difference was found in DFS and OS between the two groups (p = 0.688, p = 0.398). In addition, there was no significant difference in the intrahepatic recurrence rate and pattern between the resection margin groups. Except for the preoperative patient’s status and tumor stage, significant risk factors in OS were anatomical resection and postoperative morbidity (p = 0.002, p = 0.001).

Conclusion

We identified that the widths of the resection margin in resectable hepatocellular carcinoma did not influence the postoperative recurrence rates, overall survival, and recurrence pattern in multivariable analysis as well as propensity score match analysis.

Keywords

Overall Survival Propensity Score Resection Margin Propensity Score Match Anatomical Resection 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

None of the authors have a conflict of interest in this study.

References

  1. 1.
    Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D (2011) Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 61:69–90CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chen MF, Tsai HP, Jeng LB, Lee WC, Yeh CN, Yu MC, Hung CM (2003) Prognostic factors after resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in noncirrhotic livers: univariate and multivariate analysis. World J Surg 27:443–447. doi: 10.1007/s00268-002-6708-7 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Minagawa M, Ikai I, Matsuyama Y, Yamaoka Y, Makuuchi M (2007) Staging of hepatocellular carcinoma: assessment of the Japanese TNM and AJCC/UICC TNM systems in a cohort of 13,772 patients in Japan. Ann Surg 245:909–922CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chau GY, Lui WY, Tsay SH, King KL, Loong CC, Chiu JH, Wu CW, P’eng FK (1997) Prognostic significance of surgical margin in hepatocellular carcinoma resection: an analysis of 165 Childs’ A patients. J Surg Oncol 66:122–126CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jeng KS, Jeng WJ, Sheen IS, Lin CC, Lin CK (2013) Is less than 5 mm as the narrowest surgical margin width in central resections of hepatocellular carcinoma justified? Am J Surg 206:64–71CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Laurent C, Blanc JF, Nobili S, Sa Cunha A, le Bail B, Bioulac-Sage P, Balabaud C, Capdepont M, Saric J (2005) Prognostic factors and longterm survival after hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma originating from noncirrhotic liver. J Am Coll Surg 201:656–662CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lee KT, Wang SN, Su RW, Chen HY, Shi HY, Ker CG, Chiu HC (2012) Is wider surgical margin justified for better clinical outcomes in patients with resectable hepatocellular carcinoma? J Formos Med Assoc 111:160–170CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Poon RT, Fan ST, Ng IO, Wong J (2000) Significance of resection margin in hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a critical reappraisal. Ann Surg 231:544–551CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sasaki K, Matsuda M, Ohkura Y, Kawamura Y, Hashimoto M, Ikeda K, Kumada H, Watanabe G (2013) Minimum resection margin should be based on tumor size in hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma in hepatoviral infection patients. Hepatol Res 43:1295–1303CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shi M, Guo RP, Lin XJ, Zhang YQ, Chen MS, Zhang CQ, Lau WY, Li JQ (2007) Partial hepatectomy with wide versus narrow resection margin for solitary hepatocellular carcinoma: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg 245:36–43CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zhou XP, Quan ZW, Cong WM, Yang N, Zhang HB, Zhang SH, Yang GS (2007) Micrometastasis in surrounding liver and the minimal length of resection margin of primary liver cancer. World J Gastroenterol 13:4498–4503CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Korean Liver Cancer Study Group (2009) Practice guidelines for management of hepatocellular carcinoma 2009. Korean J Hepatol 15:391–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Austin PC (2009) Some methods of propensity-score matching had superior performance to others: results of an empirical investigation and Monte Carlo simulations. Biom J 51:171–184CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    D’Agostino RB (1998) Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group. Stat Med 17:2265–2281CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rubin DB (1997) Estimating causal effects from large data sets using propensity scores. Ann Intern Med 127:757–763CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dahiya D, Wu TJ, Lee CF, Chan KM, Lee WC, Chen MF (2010) Minor versus major hepatic resection for small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in cirrhotic patients: a 20-year experience. Surgery 147:676–685CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hasegawa K, Kokudo N, Imamura H, Matsuyama Y, Aoki T, Minagawa M, Sano K, Sugawara Y, Takayama T, Makuuchi M (2005) Prognostic impact of anatomic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg 242:252–259CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wakai T, Shirai Y, Sakata J, Kaneko K, Cruz PV, Akazawa K, Hatakeyama K (2007) Anatomic resection independently improves long-term survival in patients with T1-T2 hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 14:1356–1365CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Matsui Y, Terakawa N, Satoi S, Kaibori M, Kitade H, Takai S, Kwon AH, Kamiyama Y (2007) Postoperative outcomes in patients with hepatocellular carcinomas resected with exposure of the tumor surface: clinical role of the no-margin resection. Arch Surg 142:596–602 discussion 603 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Takasaki K (1998) Glissonean pedicle transection method for hepatic resection: a new concept of liver segmentation. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 5:286–291CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kim KH, Lee SG (2008) Usefulness of Kelly clamp crushing technique during hepatic resection. HPB (Oxford) 10:281–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Poon RT (2007) Current techniques of liver transection. HPB (Oxford) 9:166–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kaibori M, Ishizaki M, Saito T, Matsui K, Kwon AH, Kamiyama Y (2009) Risk factors and outcome of early recurrence after resection of small hepatocellular carcinomas. Am J Surg 198:39–45CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Shah SA, Greig PD, Gallinger S, Cattral MS, Dixon E, Kim RD, Taylor BR, Grant DR, Vollmer CM (2006) Factors associated with early recurrence after resection for hepatocellular carcinoma and outcomes. J Am Coll Surg 202:275–283CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ueno S, Kubo F, Sakoda M, Hiwatashi K, Tateno T, Mataki Y, Maemura K, Shinchi H, Natsugoe S, Aikou T (2008) Efficacy of anatomic resection vs nonanatomic resection for small nodular hepatocellular carcinoma based on gross classification. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 15:493–500CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Katz SC, Shia J, Liau KH, Gonen M, Ruo L, Jarnagin WR, Fong Y, D’Angelica MI, Blumgart LH, Dematteo RP (2009) Operative blood loss independently predicts recurrence and survival after resection of hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg 249:617–623CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sasaki K, Matsuda M, Ohkura Y, Kawamura Y, Inoue M, Hashimoto M, Ikeda K, Kumada H, Watanabe G (2014) In hepatocellular carcinomas, any proportion of poorly differentiated components is associated with poor prognosis after hepatectomy. World J Surg 38:1147–1153. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-2374-1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical CenterUlsan UniversitySeoulKorea
  2. 2.Asan Medical CenterSeoulKorea
  3. 3.Hallym University College of MedicineAnyang-siKorea

Personalised recommendations