Advertisement

World Journal of Surgery

, Volume 40, Issue 5, pp 1082–1091 | Cite as

Implementation of Enhanced Recovery (ERAS) in Colorectal Surgery Has a Positive Impact on Non-ERAS Liver Surgery Patients

  • Ismail Labgaa
  • Ghada Jarrar
  • Gaëtan-Romain Joliat
  • Pierre Allemann
  • Sylvain Gander
  • Catherine Blanc
  • Martin Hübner
  • Nicolas Demartines
Original Scientific Report

Abstract

Background

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) reduces complications and hospital stay in colorectal surgery. Thereafter, ERAS principles were extended to liver surgery. Previous implementation of an ERAS program in colorectal surgery may influence patients undergoing liver surgery in a non-ERAS setting, on the same ward. This study aimed to test this hypothesis.

Methods

Retrospective analysis based on prospective data of the adherence to the institutional ERAS-liver protocol (compliance) in three cohorts of consecutive patients undergoing elective liver surgery, between June 2010 and July 2014: before any ERAS implementation (pre-ERAS n = 50), after implementation of ERAS in colorectal (intermediate n = 50), and after implementation of ERAS in liver surgery (ERAS-liver n = 74). Outcomes were functional recovery, postoperative complications, hospital stay, and readmissions.

Results

The three groups were comparable for demographics; laparoscopy was more frequent in ERAS-liver (p = 0.009). Compliance with the enhanced recovery protocol increased along the three periods (pre-ERAS, intermediate, and ERAS-liver), regardless of the perioperative phase (pre-, intra-, or postoperative). ERAS-liver group displayed the highest overall compliance rate with 73.8 %, compared to 39.9 and 57.4 % for pre-ERAS and intermediate groups (p = 0.072/0.056). Overall complications were unchanged (p = 0.185), whereas intermediate and ERAS-liver groups showed decreased major complications (p = 0.034). Consistently, hospital stay was reduced by 2 days (p = 0.005) without increased readmissions (p = 0.158).

Conclusions

The previous implementation of an ERAS protocol in colorectal surgery may induce a positive impact on patients undergoing non-ERAS-liver surgery on the same ward. These results suggest that ERAS is safely applicable in liver surgery and associated with benefits.

Keywords

Full Mobilization Enhance Recovery Program Enhance Recovery Pathway Comprehensive Complication Index Enhance Recovery Protocol 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the support provided by all members of the enhanced recovery team in Lausanne, and especially the dedicated surgical nursing team with their leaders V. Addor, N. Zehnder, and A. Jannot. A particular attention is paid to the outstanding efforts and contribution achieved by V. Addor for the data management. Institutional financial support: Department of Visceral Surgery, University Hospital of Lausanne (CHUV), Switzerland.

Author contribution

Ismail Labgaa: conception and design, analysis, interpretation and writing. Ghada Jarrar: collection of data and interpretation. Gaetan-Romain Joliat: conception and design, interpretation and critical revision. Pierre Allemann: conception and design, interpretation and critical revision. Sylvain Gander: conception and design, interpretation and critical revision. Catherine Blanc: collection of data, interpretation and critical revision. Martin Hübner: conception and design, interpretation, drafting and critical revision. Nicolas Demartines: conception and design, interpretation and major editing.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interests

The authors declare no conflicts of interests and no sources of support and funding for this work.

References

  1. 1.
    Rawlinson A, Kang P, Evans J et al (2011) A systematic review of enhanced recovery protocols in colorectal surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 93:583–588CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wind J, Polle SW, Fung Kon, Jin PH et al (2006) Systematic review of enhanced recovery programmes in colonic surgery. Br J Surg 93:800–809CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Varadhan KK, Neal KR, Dejong CH et al (2010) The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway for patients undergoing major elective open colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Nutr 29:434–440CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kehlet H (2011) Surgery: fast-track colonic surgery and the ‘knowing-doing’ gap. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 8:539–540CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Spanjersberg WR, Reurings J, Keus F et al (2011) Fast track surgery versus conventional recovery strategies for colorectal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011(2), CD007635. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007635.pub2
  6. 6.
    Findlay JM, Gillies RS, Millo J et al (2014) Enhanced recovery for esophagectomy: a systematic review and evidence-based guidelines. Ann Surg 259:413–431CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hall TC, Dennison AR, Bilku DK et al (2012) Enhanced recovery programmes in hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: a systematic review. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 94:318–326CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    van Dam RM, Hendry PO, Coolsen MM et al (2008) Initial experience with a multimodal enhanced recovery programme in patients undergoing liver resection. Br J Surg 95:969–975CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hughes MJ, McNally S, Wigmore SJ (2014) Enhanced recovery following liver surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. HPB (Oxford) 16:699–706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jones C, Kelliher L, Dickinson M et al (2013) Randomized clinical trial on enhanced recovery versus standard care following open liver resection. Br J Surg 100:1015–1024CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Coolsen MM, Wong-Lun-Hing EM, van Dam RM et al (2013) A systematic review of outcomes in patients undergoing liver surgery in an enhanced recovery after surgery pathways. HPB (Oxford) 15:245–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lassen K, Soop M, Nygren J et al (2009) Consensus review of optimal perioperative care in colorectal surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Group recommendations. Arch Surg 144:961–969CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Roulin D, Donadini A, Gander S et al (2013) Cost-effectiveness of the implementation of an enhanced recovery protocol for colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 100:1108–1114CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Roulin D, Blanc C, Muradbegovic M et al (2014) Enhanced recovery pathway for urgent colectomy. World J Surg 38:2153–2159. doi: 10.1007/s00268-014-2518-y CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gustafsson UO, Scott MJ, Schwenk W et al (2013) Guidelines for perioperative care in elective colonic surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society recommendations. World J Surg 37:259–284. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2012.08.013 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nygren J, Thacker J, Carli F et al (2013) Guidelines for perioperative care in elective rectal/pelvic surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society recommendations. World J Surg 37:285–305. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2012.08.012 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lassen K, Coolsen MM, Slim K et al (2012) Guidelines for perioperative care for pancreaticoduodenectomy: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society recommendations. Clin Nutr 31:817–830CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Slankamenac K, Graf R, Barkun J et al (2013) The comprehensive complication index: a novel continuous scale to measure surgical morbidity. Ann Surg 258:1–7CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mentha G, Majno PE, Andres A et al (2006) Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and resection of advanced synchronous liver metastases before treatment of the colorectal primary. Br J Surg 93:872–878CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gustafsson UO, Hausel J, Thorell A et al (2011) Adherence to the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol and outcomes after colorectal cancer surgery. Arch Surg 146:571–577CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Maessen J, Dejong CH, Hausel J et al (2007) A protocol is not enough to implement an enhanced recovery programme for colorectal resection. Br J Surg 94:224–231CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wong-Lun-Hing EM, van Dam RM, Heijnen LA et al (2014) Is current perioperative practice in hepatic surgery based on enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) principles? World J Surg 38:1127–1140. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-2398-6 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Connor S, Cross A, Sakowska M et al (2013) Effects of introducing an enhanced recovery after surgery programme for patients undergoing open hepatic resection. HPB (Oxford) 15:294–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Stoot JH, van Dam RM, Busch OR et al (2009) The effect of a multimodal fast-track programme on outcomes in laparoscopic liver surgery: a multicentre pilot study. HPB (Oxford) 11:140–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hammond JS, Humphries S, Simson N et al (2014) Adherence to enhanced recovery after surgery protocols across a high-volume gastrointestinal surgical service. Dig Surg 31:117–122CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Dasari BV, Rahman R, Khan S et al (2015) Safety and feasibility of an enhanced recovery pathway after a liver resection: prospective cohort study. HPB (Oxford) 17:700–706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Schultz NA, Larsen PN, Klarskov B et al (2013) Evaluation of a fast-track programme for patients undergoing liver resection. Br J Surg 100:138–143CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Smith I, Kranke P, Murat I et al (2011) Perioperative fasting in adults and children: guidelines from the European Society of Anaesthesiology. Eur J Anaesthesiol 28:556–569CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Cerantola Y, Hubner M, Grass F et al (2011) Immunonutrition in gastrointestinal surgery. Br J Surg 98:37–48CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hill J, Treasure T, Guideline Development Group (2010) Reducing the risk of venous thromboembolism (deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism) in patients admitted to hospital: summary of the NICE guideline. Heart 96:879–882CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Song F, Glenny AM (1998) Antimicrobial prophylaxis in colorectal surgery: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Br J Surg 85:1232–1241CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kranke P, Eberhart LH (2011) Possibilities and limitations in the pharmacological management of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Eur J Anaesthesiol 28:758–765CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Giglio MT, Marucci M, Testini M et al (2009) Goal-directed haemodynamic therapy and gastrointestinal complications in major surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Br J Anaesth 103:637–646CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Brooke-Smith M, Figueras J, Ullah S et al (2015) Prospective evaluation of the International Study Group for Liver Surgery definition of bile leak after a liver resection and the role of routine operative drainage: an international multicentre study. HPB (Oxford) 17:46–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Nelson R, Edwards S, Tse B (2007) Prophylactic nasogastric decompression after abdominal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007(3), CD004929. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004929.pub3
  37. 37.
    Convertino VA, Cardiovascular consequences of bed rest (1997) effect on maximal oxygen uptake. Med Sci Sports Exerc 29:191–196CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ismail Labgaa
    • 1
  • Ghada Jarrar
    • 1
  • Gaëtan-Romain Joliat
    • 1
  • Pierre Allemann
    • 1
  • Sylvain Gander
    • 2
  • Catherine Blanc
    • 3
  • Martin Hübner
    • 1
  • Nicolas Demartines
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Visceral SurgeryUniversity Hospital of Lausanne (CHUV)LausanneSwitzerland
  2. 2.Department of AnesthesiologyHospital of Yverdon-Les-BainsYverdon-Les-BainsSwitzerland
  3. 3.Department of AnesthesiologyUniversity Hospital of Lausanne (CHUV)LausanneSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations