World Journal of Surgery

, Volume 40, Issue 2, pp 323–328 | Cite as

Treatment of Patients with Distant Metastases from Phyllodes Tumor of the Breast

  • J. W. Mituś
  • P. Blecharz
  • T. Walasek
  • M. Reinfuss
  • J. Jakubowicz
  • J. Kulpa
Open Access
Original Scientific Report

Abstract

Background

Here, the treatment methods and results of patients with phyllodes tumor of the breast (PT) with distant metastases at a single institution are presented.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed on a group of 295 patients with PT treated from 1952 to 2010.

Results

Distant metastases developed in 37 (12.5 %) patients; 3/160 (1.9 %) patients had benign PT, 6/36 (16.7 %) were considered borderline, and 28/99 (28.3 %) had malignant PT. Most frequently, the metastases were located in the lungs; 28 (75.7 %), bone 7 (18.9 %), brain 4 (10.8 %), and liver 2 (5.4 %). Metastases occurred on overage 21 months (2–57) after surgery. Patients with lung metastases were generally treated with monochemotherapy or polychemotherapy. In one patient Testosterone and in two patients resection of metastases combined with Doxorubicin were used. Patients with bones or brain metastases were treated with palliative radiotherapy only or combined with Doxorubicin. The mean survival (MS) from diagnosis of distant metastases (DM) was 7 months (2–17). The longest mean survival in patients with bones metastases was 11.8 months, the worst survival was for patients with brain metastases—2.8 months. Hormone therapy appeared to have low efficacy (MS: 2 months) as well as monochemotherapy (MS: 3–5 months). Improved MS was obtained using Doxorubicin (7 months) and Doxorubicin with Cisplatin, Cyclophosphamide, or Ifosfamide (9 months).

Conclusion

The prognosis of patients with DM from PT is poor. The role of surgery and irradiation of such patients is very limited. There appears to be no role for the use of hormone therapy. This study showed that polychemotherapy with Doxorubicin and Ifosfamide suggest that it might be more effective than once thought.

Introduction

Phyllodes tumor (PT) is a rare fibro-epithelial neoplasm of the breast that accounts for 0.2–2 % of breast tumors in women [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]. PT is classified as benign or malignant; however, distinguishing those histotypes is difficult and based on semi-quantitative evaluation of the stromal component criteria including nuclear pleomorphism, mitotic rate, overgrowth, cellularity, and aspects of tumor margins [1, 2, 4, 7, 10].

The main cause of treatment failure in patients with PT of the breast is the dissemination of the neoplasm, which is diagnosed in 1–15 % of all patients [2, 11, 12]. The clinical behavior of a PT is unpredictable. Distant metastases (DM) occur mainly in malignant and borderline PT; however, metastatic spread in the benign type of PT has been described [11, 12]. The incidence of metastatic disease among patients with malignant PT is estimated to be approximately 20–25 % [2, 3].

A metastatic PT carries a poor prognosis with an average survival time of less than 2 years [2, 12, 13, 14]. The treatment of DM in patients with PT is a matter of debate. The role of surgery and radiotherapy is limited, and there is no role for the use of hormone therapy [2, 6, 8, 15]. Chemotherapy has been used for many years; however, it is difficult to assess the real value of this treatment due to the small size of the study groups and the diversity of drugs used for treatment, as well as the doses and regimens applied [2, 6, 9, 15, 16, 17, 18].

The aim of this study was to present the methods used and clinical outcomes of patients with DM from PT after treatment at a single institution in Poland.

Materials and methods

Between January 1952 and February 2010, 295 women with PT of the breast were treated surgically at the Maria Skłodowska-Curie Memorial Institute of Oncology, Cancer Center in Cracow, Poland. All clinical characteristics, treatment options, and therapy outcomes were acquired by the review of patients’ charts. The diagnosis and specific microscopic type of neoplasm were confirmed according to the WHO classification. All histology slides were re-examined, and the diagnosis of histotypes of PT was based on World Health Organization criteria.

The five-year survival with no evidence of disease (NED) was used as the endpoint for the analysis. 5-year NED was chosen as the primary endpoint because it reflects distant tumor control better compared to other commonly used outcome measures. All patients were followed up for at least 5 years (or until death). The mean follow-up time was 11 years. The log-rank test was used for evaluation of significance. The level of statistical significance was set at p ≤ 0.05. A multivariate Cox proportional hazard model was applied to analyze influence of evaluated factors on the adjusted survival.

Results

Among all 295 patients, 256 (86.8 %) survived the 5-year NED. Table 1 shows the clinical outcomes according to the PT histotypes.
Table 1

Results of the treatment in 295 patients with PT

Phyllodes tumor

No. of patients

5-year NED

Distant Metastases

No of patients

%

No. of patients

%

Benign

160

155

96.9

3a

1.9

Borderline

36

30

83.3

6

16.7

Malignant

99

71

71.7

28

28.3

Total

295

256

86.8

37a

12.5

aTwo additional patients died without PT recurrences

The 5-year NED survival was observed in 96.9 % patients with benign PT, 83.3 % with borderline PT, and 71.7 % with malignant PT. Two patients in the group with benign PT died due to other reasons (myocardial infarct and cerebral hemorrhage). All other patients (3 benign, 6 borderline, and 28 malignant PT) who died during the 5-year follow-up developed DM.

Among 196 patients with benign and borderline PT, 9 (4.6 %) and among 99 patients with malignant PT, 28 (28.3 %) developed DM. The difference was statistically significant (log-rank test, p < 0.01).

This study focused on a group of 37 patients with distant metastases (DM) from PT. The median age of those patients was 54 (range 48–76 years of age). The tumor size, defined as the maximal dimension of the tumor, as reported in the pathology report, ranged from 4 to 8 cm (mean 6 cm, median 5.5 cm). The tumor measurements were as follows: <5 cm in 21 (56.8 %) patients, 5–7 cm in 13 (35.1 %) patients, and over 7 cm in 3 (8.1 %) patients. In two patients, regional lymph node metastases were also diagnosed. Table 2 shows the localization of DM.
Table 2

Localization of DM in the group of 37 patients with PT

Localization

No. of patients

%

Lung

24

64.9

Lung + bones

2

5.4

Lung + liver

2

5.4

Bones

5

13.5

Brain

4

10.9

Total

37

100.0

In the group studied, the most frequent metastases were to the lungs 28 (75.7 %). Metastases also occurred to bones 7 (18.9 %), brain 4 (10.8 %), and liver 2 (5.4 %). DM were observed, on average, 21 months (range 2–57) after surgery. Among those patients that developed DM, 91.9 % (34/37) demonstrated DM within 3 years of initial treatment.

Table 3 shows the methods and clinical outcomes of treatment in 37 patients with phyllodes tumor DM.
Table 3

Methods and results of the treatment in 37 patients with phyllodes tumor DM

Localization of DM

Treatment

No. of patients

Results

Remission

Survival (months) from diagnosis of DM

Lung (24 patients)

Testosterone

1

NMa

2

Cyclophosphamide

2

NM

3 and 3

Methotrexate + dactinomycin + Cyclophosphamide + vincristine

3

NM

4, 4, and 4

Ifosfamide

4

PR—1 patient

NR—3 patients

6

6, 5, and 5

Doxorubicin

6

PR—4 patients

NR—2 patients

9, 9, 8, and 5

6 and 5

Resection of individual metastases + Doxorubicin

2

CR

8 and 9

Doxorubicin + Cisplatin

3

PR—3 patients

9, 8, and 9

Doxorubicin + Ifosfamide

3

CR—1 patients

PR—2 patients

11

10 and 9

Lung + liver (2 patients)

Doxorubicin + Cisplatin

2

PR—1 patient

NR—1 patient

8

6

Lung + bones (2 patients)

Doxorubicin + CyclophosphamideDoxorubicine + palliative radiotherapy

2

PR—1 patient

NR—1 patient

9

9

Bones (5 patients)

Doxorubicin + palliative radiotherapy

5

PR—5 patients

11, 11, 10, 10, and 17

Brain (4 patients)

Palliative radiotherapy

Palliative radiotherapy + Doxorubicin

3

1

NR

NR

2, 3, and 3

3

NR no remission

PR partial remission

CR complete remission

Between 1952 and 1985, six patients with lung metastases were treated with hormone therapy (Testosterone), monochemotherapy (Cyclophosphamide), and polychemotherapy (Methotrexate + Dactinomycin + Cyclophosphamide + Vincristine).

Between 1986 and 2010, 22 patients with lung metastases were treated as follows:
  • Ten patients with monochemotherapy: Ifosfamide (four patients) or Doxorubicin (six patients)

  • Ten patients with polychemotherapy: Doxorubicin + Cisplatin (five patients), Doxorubicin + Ifosfamide (three patients), Doxorubicin + Cyclophosphamide (two patients)

  • Two patients: resection of metastases was combined with Doxorubicin.

In 11 patients with bone or brain metastases, palliative radiotherapy (PR) (20 Gy in five fractions) was used (two patients with lung and bone metastases: PR was combined with Doxorubicin + Cyclophosphamide, five patients with bone metastases only received PR + Doxorubicin, one patient with brain metastases received PR + Doxorubicin, and three patients with brain metastases received PR only).

The mean survival (MS) from the diagnosis of distant metastases in the study patients was 7 months (2–17), and the median 8 months. Among 24 patients with lung metastases: complete remission (CR) occurred in three patients (MS 9.1 months), partial remission (PR) in 10 patients (MS 8.2 months), and no remission (NR) in 11 patients (MS 4.3 months). The MS of patients with lung and liver metastases was 7 months, and with lung and bone metastases it was 9 months. In the group studied here, two patients were treated with resection of individual lung metastasis and Doxorubicin; they survived 8 and 9 months after treatment. The longest MS was among patients with bone metastases (11.8 months), and the worst MS was among patients with brain metastases (2.8 months).

Table 3 shows the low efficacy of hormone therapy (MS 2 months) and monochemotherapy (Cyclophosphamide MS 3 months, Ifosfamide 5 months). A longer MS was obtained after the use of Doxorubicin monochemotherapy (7 months), and Doxorubicin polychemotherapy with Cisplatin, Cyclophosphamide, or Ifosfamide (9 months).

Discussion

For the study group of 295 patients with PT, 37 (12.5 %) presented with DM, consistent with prior literature [1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 9, 11, 12, 14, 19, 20, 21, 22]. Among 160 patients with benign PT, 3 (1.9 %) developed DM, among 36 patients with borderline PT, 6 (16.7 %) and among 99 patients with malignant PT, 28 developed DM (28.3 %). The accepted frequency of DM in benign, borderline, and malignant PT is 0–2, 3–11, and 6–47 %, respectively [1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 9, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 22, 23, 24].

Most frequently, metastases are to the lung, bones, brain, and liver; this is consistent with the patients reported here [1, 2, 6, 11, 12]. DM from PT may also occur in other organs, such as the heart, pleura, oral cavity, larynx, nasal cavity, salivary glands, thyroid, adrenal glands, spleen, pancreas, kidney, stomach, small and large intestine, seminal glands, prostate, skin, ovary, and vulva to name some [5, 8, 9, 11, 25].

The time span between treatment of the primary tumor and possible manifestation of distant metastases varies greatly, and ranges from 1 month to over 10 years; however, the majority of DM of PT are noted within the first 3 years [2, 6, 12, 14, 20, 26]. In this study group of patients, DM were observed on average after 21 months (2-57), in other reports: 15 months (Abdala and Sakr), 14 months (Barrio et al.), 21 months (Kapiris et al.), 30 months (Fou et al.), and 53 months (Asoglu et al.) [6, 14, 20, 24, 26].

The role of surgery for the treatment of disseminated PT is limited to palliative management such as resection of individual metastases [2]. An effective method of palliative treatment may be irradiation of metastases, such as those to the bones, brain, and mediastinal lymph nodes. Five of the patients in this study, with bone metastases, had the longest mean survival of all patients with DM of PT (11.8 months) [2, 6, 19].

While the epithelial component of most PT contains estrogen and progesterone receptors, hormone therapy did not demonstrate any significant efficacy in the treatment of DM [4, 6, 8, 11].

In the patients with DM from a PT, chemotherapy has been considered the first-line treatment for many years [2, 9, 11, 15, 16, 25]. Many investigators have confirmed a low efficacy of monochemotherapy (Cyclophosphamide, Ifosfamide, Doxorubicin), although there are single reports of spectacular, usually short-lasting, regressions [2, 15, 16, 18, 25, 27]. Slightly better regression, although usually neither substantial nor long-lasting, is obtained after treatment with polychemotherapy (Doxorubicin with Cisplatin or Ifosfamide, Cisplatin with Etoposide [2, 15, 16, 18, 27]. Total regression of metastatic foci has been reported as well [2, 16, 17, 28].

In this study group of patients with lung metastases, there was a low efficacy of treatment with monochemotherapy with Cyclophosphamide (MS 3 months) or Ifosfamide (MS 5 months). There was a slightly better MS with monochemotherapy using Doxorubicin (MS 7 months) and Doxorubicin used in polychemotherapy with Cisplatin, Cyclophosphamide, or Ifosfamide (MS months). The best survival was observed in patients with bone metastases only that were treated with palliative radiotherapy and Doxorubicin (MS 11.8 months). No evident neurological improvement was noted in the four patients with brain metastases treated with palliative radiotherapy (MS 2.8 months).

Investigators differ in their assessment of survival in patients with PT once manifestations of DM are noted. Reinfuss et al. reported an MS of 4 months, Abdalla and Sakr 5 months (1–11), Barth et al. 12 months, Kapiris et al. 16.6 months (1–24), and de Ross et al. 17 months (12–15) [6, 12, 13, 14, 29]. It is generally reported that the survival time of patients with DM from PT is shorter than 24 months, even though there are longer survival times, even up to 16 years [2, 18]. In this group of patients, the MS was 7 months (2–17) and the median was 8 months.

Phyllodes tumor DM carries a poor prognosis. In the 1950s and 1970s, chemotherapy was shown to have minimal impact on survival of patients. However, data from the literature and the results of this study with polychemotherapy (Doxorubicin + Ifosfamide or Cisplatin) suggest that chemotherapy may be more efficient than previously thought [2, 7, 15, 16]. The NCCN recommends that treatment of DM in patients with PT follow the algorithm outlined in the NCCN Soft Tissue Sarcoma Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology and novel drugs (Docetaxel + Gemcitabine, Pazopanib, or Trabectedin) may be used for example [30]. Future studies to identify relevant molecular targets should be carried out in order to define more effective therapies for DM in patients with PT. In 2013, Jardim et al. described for the first time an NRAS mutation with concomitant activation of P13 K/Akt/mTOR with PT. The investigators reported markers for sensitivity to taxane-based therapies, especially albumin-bound paclitaxel [31].

Conclusion

In conclusion, on the basis of the results of this study and data from the literature, the prognosis of patients with DM from PT is poor, with an average survival of less than 2 years after diagnosis. The role of surgery and irradiation in the treatment of these patients is very limited (resection of individual DM, palliative irradiation DM in bones or brain), and there is no role for hormone therapy. Our findings of multidrug systemic therapy with Doxorubicin and Ifosfamide suggest that chemotherapy may be more efficient than once thought. At present, patients with DM from PT of the breast should be treated in the same manner as are patients with metastatic soft tissue sarcoma.

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

All the authors declare that there is no financial interest or any other potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Kim S, Kim JY, Kim do H, Jung WH, Koo JS (2013) Analysis of phyllodes tumor recurrence according to the histologic grade. Breast Cancer Res Treat 141(3):353–363. doi:10.1007/s10549-013-2684-x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Telli ML, Horst KC, Guardino AE, Dirbas FM, Carlson RW (2007) Phyllodes tumors of the breast: natural history, diagnosis, and treatment. JNCCN 5(3):324–330PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Spitaleri G, Toesca A, Botteri E, Bottiglieri L, Rotmensz N, Boselli S et al (2013) Breast phyllodes tumor: a review of literature and a single center retrospective series analysis. Crit Rev Oncol/Hematol 88(2):427–436. doi:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2013.06.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mitus JW, Blecharz P, Reinfuss M, Kulpa JK, Skotnicki P, Wysocki WM (2013) Changes in the clinical characteristics, treatment options, and therapy outcomes in patients with phyllodes tumor of the breast during 55 years of experience. Med Sci Monit 19:1183–1187. doi:10.12659/MSM.889687 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Abdulcadir D, Nori J, Meattini I, Giannotti E, Boeri C, Vanzi E et al (2014) Phyllodes tumours of the breast diagnosed as B3 category on image-guided 14-gauge core biopsy: analysis of 51 cases from a single institution and review of the literature. Eur J Surg Oncol 40(7):859–864. doi:10.1016/j.ejso.2014.02.222 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kapiris I, Nasiri N, A’Hern R, Healy V, Gui GP (2001) Outcome and predictive factors of local recurrence and distant metastases following primary surgical treatment of high-grade malignant phyllodes tumours of the breast. Eur J Surg Oncol 27(8):723–730. doi:10.1053/ejso.2001.1207 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mitus J, Reinfuss M, Mitus JW, Jakubowicz J, Blecharz P, Wysocki WM et al (2014) Malignant phyllodes tumor of the breast: treatment and prognosis. Breast J 20(6):639–644. doi:10.1111/tbj.12333 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tse GM, Niu Y, Shi HJ (2010) Phyllodes tumor of the breast: an update. Breast Cancer 17(1):29–34. doi:10.1007/s12282-009-0114-z PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chen WH, Cheng SP, Tzen CY, Yang TL, Jeng KS, Liu CL et al (2005) Surgical treatment of phyllodes tumors of the breast: retrospective review of 172 cases. J Surg Oncol 91(3):185–194. doi:10.1002/jso.20334 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cheng SP, Chang YC, Liu TP, Lee JJ, Tzen CY, Liu CL (2006) Phyllodes tumor of the breast: the challenge persists. World J Surg 30(8):1414–1421. doi:10.1007/s00268-005-0786-2 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chaney AW, Pollack A, McNeese MD, Zagars GK, Pisters PW, Pollock RE et al (2000) Primary treatment of cystosarcoma phyllodes of the breast. Cancer 89(7):1502–1511PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Reinfuss M, Mitus J, Duda K, Stelmach A, Rys J, Smolak K (1996) The treatment and prognosis of patients with phyllodes tumor of the breast: an analysis of 170 cases. Cancer 77(5):910–916PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Barth RJ Jr, Wells WA, Mitchell SE, Cole BF (2009) A prospective, multi-institutional study of adjuvant radiotherapy after resection of malignant phyllodes tumors. Ann Surg Oncol 16(8):2288–2294. doi:10.1245/s10434-009-0489-2 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Abdalla HM, Sakr MA (2006) Predictive factors of local recurrence and survival following primary surgical treatment of phyllodes tumors of the breast. J Egypt Natl Cancer Inst 18(2):125–133Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Burton GV, Hart LL, Leight GS Jr, Iglehart JD, McCarty KS Jr, Cox EB (1989) Cystosarcoma phyllodes. Effective therapy with cisplatin and etoposide chemotherapy. Cancer 63(11):2088–2092PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hawkins RE, Schofield JB, Wiltshaw E, Fisher C, McKinna JA (1992) Ifosfamide is an active drug for chemotherapy of metastatic cystosarcoma phyllodes. Cancer 69(9):2271–2275PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Park IH, Kwon Y, Kim EA, Lee KS, Ro J (2009) Major response to sunitinib (Sutene) in metastatic malignant phyllodes tumor of breast. Investig New Drugs 27(4):387–388. doi:10.1007/s10637-008-9195-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kessinger A, Foley JF, Lemon HM, Miller DM (1972) Metastatic cystosarcoma phyllodes: a case report and review of the literature. J Surg Oncol 4(2):131–147PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Reinfuss M, Mitus J, Smolak K, Stelmach A (1993) Malignant phyllodes tumours of the breast. A clinical and pathological analysis of 55 cases. Eur J Cancer 29A(9):1252–1256PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Barrio AV, Clark BD, Goldberg JI, Hoque LW, Bernik SF, Flynn LW et al (2007) Clinicopathologic features and long-term outcomes of 293 phyllodes tumors of the breast. Ann Surg Oncol. 14(10):2961–2970. doi:10.1245/s10434-007-9439-z PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Guillot E, Couturaud B, Reyal F, Curnier A, Ravinet J, Lae M et al (2011) Management of phyllodes breast tumors. Breast J 17(2):129–137. doi:10.1111/j.1524-4741.2010.01045.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Belkacemi Y, Bousquet G, Marsiglia H, Ray-Coquard I, Magne N, Malard Y et al (2008) Phyllodes tumor of the breast. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 70(2):492–500. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.06.059 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Macdonald OK, Lee CM, Tward JD, Chappel CD, Gaffney DK (2006) Malignant phyllodes tumor of the female breast: association of primary therapy with cause-specific survival from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program. Cancer 107(9):2127–2133. doi:10.1002/cncr.22228 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Fou A, Schnabel FR, Hamele-Bena D, Wei XJ, Cheng B, El Tamer M et al (2006) Long-term outcomes of malignant phyllodes tumors patients: an institutional experience. Am J Surg 192(4):492–495. doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.06.017 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Reinfuss M, Mitus J, Stelmach A (1995) Phyllodes tumor of the breast. Strahlentherapie und Onkologie 171(1):5–11PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Asoglu O, Ugurlu MM, Blanchard K, Grant CS, Reynolds C, Cha SS et al (2004) Risk factors for recurrence and death after primary surgical treatment of malignant phyllodes tumors. Ann Surg Oncol 11(11):1011–1017. doi:10.1245/ASO.2004.02.001 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hawkins RE, Schofield JB, Fisher C, Wiltshaw E, McKinna JA (1992) The clinical and histologic criteria that predict metastases from cystosarcoma phyllodes. Cancer 69(1):141–147PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Riepl M, Strnad V (1994) Radiochemotherapy in the liver metastases of cystosarcoma phyllodes. Strahlentherapie und Onkologie 170(11):668–672PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    de Roos WK, Kaye P, Dent DM (1999) Factors leading to local recurrence or death after surgical resection of phyllodes tumours of the breast. Br J Surg 86(3):396–399. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2168.1999.01035.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN Clinical practice guidelines in Oncology. Soft tissue sarcoma. 2014 Accessed NCCN.org Version 2Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Jardim DL, Conley A, Subbiah V (2013) Comprehensive characterization of malignant phyllodes tumor by whole genomic and proteomic analysis: biological implications for targeted therapy opportunities. Orphanet J Rare Dis 8:112. doi:10.1186/1750-1172-8-112 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2015

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. W. Mituś
    • 1
    • 2
  • P. Blecharz
    • 3
  • T. Walasek
    • 4
  • M. Reinfuss
    • 4
  • J. Jakubowicz
    • 5
  • J. Kulpa
    • 6
  1. 1.Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre of OncologyMaria Skłodowska-Curie Memorial Institute, Cracow BranchKrakówPoland
  2. 2.Department of Anatomy, Collegium MedicumJagiellonian UniversityKrakówPoland
  3. 3.Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Centre of OncologyMaria Skłodowska-Curie Memorial Institute, Cracow BranchKrakówPoland
  4. 4.Department of Radiotherapy, Centre of OncologyMaria Skłodowska-Curie Memorial Institute, Cracow BranchKrakówPoland
  5. 5.Department of Clinical Oncology, Centre of OncologyMaria Skłodowska-Curie Memorial Institute, Cracow BranchKrakówPoland
  6. 6.Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Centre of OncologyMaria Skłodowska-Curie Memorial Institute, Cracow BranchKrakówPoland

Personalised recommendations