The Effect of Body Mass Index on Perioperative Outcomes After Major Surgery: Results from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) 2005–2011
- 785 Downloads
Obesity is associated with poor surgical outcomes and disparity in access-to-care. There is a lack of quality data on the effect of body mass index (BMI) on perioperative outcomes. Accordingly, we sought to determine the procedure specific, independent-effect of BMI on 30-day perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing major surgery.
Participants included individuals undergoing one of 16 major surgery (cardiovascular, orthopedic, oncologic; n = 141,802) recorded in the ACS-NSQIP (2005–2011). Outcomes evaluated included complications, blood transfusion, length-of-stay (LOS), re-intervention, readmission, and perioperative mortality. Multivariable-regression models assessed the independent-effect of BMI on outcomes.
Nearly, 74 % of patients had a BMI disturbance; the majority being overweight (35.3 %) or obese (29.8 %). Morbidly obese patients constituted a small but significant proportion of the patients (5.7 %; n = 8067). In adjusted-analyses, morbidly obese patients had significantly increased odds of wound complications in 15 of the examined procedures, of renal complications after 6-procedures, of thromboembolism after 5-procedures, of pulmonary, septic and UTI complications after 2-procedures, and of cardiovascular complications after CABG. Conversely, obese/overweight patients, except for increased odds of wound complications after select procedures, had significantly decreased odds of perioperative mortality, prolonged-LOS and blood transfusion relative to normal BMI patients after 4, 8, and 9 of the examined procedures.
The prevalence of BMI derangements in surgical patients is high. The effect of BMI on outcomes is procedure specific. Patients with BMI between 18.5 and 40-kg/m2 at time of surgery fare equally well with regard to complications and mortality. However, morbidly obese patients are at-risk for postsurgical complications and targeted preoperative-optimization may improve outcomes and attenuate disparity in access-to-care.
KeywordsObese Patient Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Wound Complication Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair Underweight Patient
Quoc-Dien Trinh is supported by the Professor Walter Morris-Hale Distinguished Chair in Urologic Oncology at Brigham and Women’s Hospital; The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program and the hospitals participating in the ACS-NSQIP are the source of the data used herein; they have not verified and are not responsible for the statistical validity of the data analysis or the conclusions derived by the authors.
Conflict of interest
- 4.Hsueh WA, Buchanan TA (1994) Obesity and hypertension. Endocrinol Metab Clin N Am 23:405–427Google Scholar
- 16.Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services. http://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-Fee-for-Service-Payment/HospitalAcqCond/Hospital-Acquired_Conditions.html. Accessed 2 Apr 2014
- 18.American College of Surgeons American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project: User Guide for the 2011 Participant Use Data File (2012)Google Scholar
- 22.Ravi P, Sood A, Schmid M et al (2015) Racial disparities in perioperative outcomes of major procedures: results from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Ann Surg. (Epub ahead of print)Google Scholar
- 26.Cho H, Yoshikawa T, Oba MS et al (2014) Matched pair analysis to examine the effects of a planned preoperative exercise program in early gastric cancer patients with metabolic syndrome to reduce operative risk: the Adjuvant Exercise for General Elective Surgery (AEGES) study group. Ann Surg Oncol 21:2044–2050CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 40.Fisher JE (2011) Chapter 96—Peroperative management of the obese. In: Fischer’s mastery of surgery, vols 1 & 2, 6th edn. Lippincott Williams & WilkinsGoogle Scholar