Naso-enteric Tube Placement: A Review of Methods to Confirm Tip Location, Global Applicability and Requirements
- 1.2k Downloads
The insertion of a tube through the nose and into the stomach or beyond is a common clinical procedure for feeding and decompression. The safety, accuracy and reliability of tube insertion and methods used to confirm the location of the naso-enteric tube (NET) tip have not been systematically reviewed. The aim of this study is to review and compare these methods and determine their global applicability by end-user engagement.
A systematic literature review of four major databases was performed to identify all relevant studies. The methods for NET tip localization were then compared for their accuracy with reference to a gold standard method (radiography or endoscopy). The global applicability of the different methods was analysed using a house of quality matrix.
After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 76 articles were selected. Limitations were found to be associated with the 20 different methods described for NET tip localization. The method with the best combined sensitivity and specificity (where n > 1) was ultrasound/sonography, followed by external magnetic guidance, electromagnetic methods and then capnography/capnometry. The top three performance criteria that were considered most important for global applicability were cost per tube/disposable, success rate and cost for non-disposable components.
There is no ideal method for confirming NET tip localisation. While radiography (the gold standard used for comparison) and ultrasound were the most accurate methods, they are costly and not universally available. There remains the need to develop a low-cost, easy-use, accurate and reliable method for NET tip localization.
KeywordsPerformance Criterion Gold Standard Method Newcastle Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale Stakeholder Requirement Language Suitability
- 3.Hodin R, Bordeianou L (2013) Nasogastric and nasoenteric tubes. UpToDate, Wolters Kluwer Health. Accessed 15 Jan 2014Google Scholar
- 4.Williams S, McDavid G (2012) Nasogastric tube errors. Casebook. 3 20:10–13Google Scholar
- 9.Institute ECRI (2006) Confirming feeding tube placement: old habits die hard. Pa Patient Saf Auth 3(4):23–30Google Scholar
- 11.Wells GA, Shea B, O’Connell D et al (2014) The Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, OttawaGoogle Scholar
- 12.Hauser J, Clausig D (1988) The House of Quality. Harvard business review. Harvard College, Boston, p 16Google Scholar
- 13.House of Quality (QFD) Tutorial (2007–2010) [Interactive online tutorial]. http://www.qfdonline.com/qfd-tutorials/house-of-quality-tutorial. Accessed 7 Apr 2014
- 14.Joanna Briggs Institute (2010) Methods for determining the correct nasogastric tube placement after insertion in adults. Best Pract 14(1):1–4Google Scholar
- 17.Page S (2012) How to check nasogastric tube placement. Clinical nursing skills and techniques. Accessed 12 Feb 2014Google Scholar
- 44.Holzinger U, Kitzerberger W, Madl C, et al (2009) Prospective randomised comparison study of two methods of jejunal placement of enteral feeding tubes in critically ill patients: endoscopic versus electromagnetic visualised method. In European society of intensive care medicine. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 70.Karmally Z, Cyron M, Fowler K, et al (2011) Electromagnetic guided feeding tube insertion: enhancing patient safety. In: Abstract 264, t.S.o.C.C.M. conference, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
- 71.Elliot S, Ahmed SM, Mallick A (2010) Electromagnetic sensor guided nasojejunal tube placement in critically ill patients, In: E-poster. European society of intensive care medicine. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 72.Mathus-Vliegan E, Ramali M, Singels L, et al (2009) Feasibility and safety of the placement of nasoduodenal feeding tubes by nurses with the assistance of an electromagnetic guidance system (Cortrak). In: American society for gastrointestinal endoscopy. Amsterdam Academic Medical Center Digestive Disease Week, Amsterdam, NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
- 73.Gabriel S, Sabry A, Walter H (1998) Guiding nasoenteral feeding tubes into the distal duodenum with magnets: results from 161 intubations. In: 27th educational and scientific symposium, S.o.C.C. Medicine. San Antonio, Texas, p 89AGoogle Scholar
- 81.Jimenez EJ, Ugo PJ, Trottier SJ (1998) Placement of nasointestinal pH-sensing feeding tube: a prospective evaluation. S.o.C.C. Medicine, San Antonio, p 89Google Scholar
- 89.Kenar J, Echard T, Riley S (2010) Use of an electromagnetic placement device for enteral feeding tubes reduces nursing time and financial burden. In: Critical care medicine. Northwestern Memorial Hospital, ChicagoGoogle Scholar