World Journal of Surgery

, Volume 39, Issue 3, pp 776–781 | Cite as

Pedestrian Injuries-Related Deaths: A Global Evaluation

  • Hani O. Eid
  • Fikri M. Abu-ZidanEmail author
Original Scientific Report



Pedestrians are vulnerable road users who are at risk of injuries and death on the roads. We aimed to define factors affecting pedestrian injuries-related deaths worldwide and to give recommendations regarding their prevention priorities.


Data on pedestrian injuries-related deaths for years 2007 and 2010 were retrieved from the WHO global status reports on road safety. These included the country population, gross national income (GNI), number of registered vehicles, estimated pedestrian deaths rate, effectiveness of enforcement of law, and the presence of policies to promote walking or cycling. Correlations between studied variables were done using Spearman rank correlation. General linear models were used to define factors affecting pedestrian injuries-related deaths.


The median (range) pedestrian death rates of different countries per 100,000 population significantly decreased in year 2010 compared with year 2007 [3.9 (0–13.5) compared with 4.2 (0–23.6), (p = 0.004, Wilcoxon signed rank test)]. There was a reduction of 8.1 % of the global pedestrian death rate between 2007 and 2010. The estimated pedestrian lives saved annually worldwide of a population of 6.8 billion were 23,120 persons. A general linear model has shown that GNI (p = 0.001) and population density (p = 0.01) were the best predictors of pedestrian death rates in 2007, while national legislation (p = 0.03) was the best predictor of pedestrian death rates in 2010.


There is a change in the factors affecting pedestrian mortality worldwide over time. GNI and population density became less significant than national legislation enforcement. Legislation and its enforcement are important to achieve the UN mission of reducing road traffic deaths by 5 million over the next decade.


Road Safety Road User Gross National Income General Linear Model Model Pedestrian Safety 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Conflict of interest

All authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.


  1. 1.
    World Health Organization (2013) Global burden of disease. Geneva, World Health Organization. Available at: ( Accessed 10 April 2014
  2. 2.
    World Health Organization (2013) Global status report on road safety: supporting a decade of action. Geneva, World Health Organization. Available at: Accessed 8 April 2014
  3. 3.
    Lozano R, Naghavi M, Foreman K et al (2012) Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 380:2095–2128CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    World Health Organization (2011) Decade of Action for Road Safety 2011–2020: saving millions of lives. Geneva, World Health Organization. Available at: Accessed 10 April 2014
  5. 5.
    American College of Surgeons, Injury Prevention and Control, Accessed on 4 Sep 2014)
  6. 6.
    Royal Australasian College of Surgeons (2004) Appendix to Policy on Trauma (injury) 2004, Royal Australasian College of Surgeons p. 7Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chakravarthy B, Lotfipour S, Vaca FE (2007) Pedestrian injuries: emergency care considerations. Cal J Emerg Med 8:15–21PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zegeer CV, Bushell M (2012) Pedestrian crash trends and potential countermeasures from around the world. Accid Anal Prev 44:3–11CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    World Health Organization (2004) World report on road traffic injury prevention. Geneva, World Health Organization. Available at: Accessed 10 April 2014
  10. 10.
    Nantulya VM, Reich MR (2002) The neglected epidemic: road traffic injuries in developing countries. BMJ 324:1139–1141CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    World Health Organization (2009) Global status report on road safety: time for action. Geneva, World Health Organization. Available at: Accessed 8 April 2014
  12. 12.
    Area and Population of Countries. Available at: Accessed 8 April 2014
  13. 13.
    Miller J, Haden P (2006) Statistical analysis with the general linear model. University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand. Accessed 18 Sept 2014
  14. 14.
    Berry G (1998) Generalized linear models. In: Kerr C, Taylor R, Heard G (eds) Handbook of Public Health Methods. McGraw-Hill, Sydney, pp 340–343Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Toroyan T, Khayesi M, Peden M (2013) Time to prioritise safe walking. Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot 20:197–202CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lascala EA, Gerber D, Gruenewald PJ (2000) Demographic and environmental correlates of pedestrian injury collisions: a spatial analysis. Accid Anal Prev 32:651–658CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    World Health Organization (2010) Improving global road safety, A/RES/64/255. Resolution of the United Nations General Assembly, 64th session, 10 May 2010. Available at:
  18. 18.
    Celso B, Tepas J, Langland-Orban B et al (2006) A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing outcome of severely injured patients treated in trauma centers following the establishment of trauma systems. J Trauma 60:371–378CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kudryavtsev AV, Nilssen O, Lund J et al (2012) Explaining reduction of pedestrian-motor vehicle crashes in Arkhangelsk, Russia, in 2005–2010. Int J Circumpolar Health 71:19107CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Naci H, Chisholm D, Baker TD (2009) Distribution of road traffic deaths by road user group: a global comparison. Inj Prev 15:55–59CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hefny AF, Eid HO, Abu-Zidan FM (2014) Pedestrian injuries in the United Arab Emirates. Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot 10(1080/17457300):884143Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Paulozzi LJ, Ryan GW, Espitia-Hardeman VE et al (2007) Economic development’s effect on road transport-related mortality among different types of road users: a cross-sectional international study. Accid Anal Prev 39:606–617CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    World Health Organization (2013) Pedestrian safety: a road safety manual for decision-makers and practitioners. Geneva, World Health Organization. Available at: Accessed 10 April 2014
  24. 24.
    Gårder PE (2004) The impact of speed and other variables on pedestrian safety in Maine. Accid Anal Prev 36:533–542CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Eid HO, Abu-Zidan FM (2007) Biomechanics of road traffic collision injuries: a clinician’s perspective. Singapore Med J 48:693–700PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rosén E, Stigson H, Sander U (2011) Literature review of pedestrian fatality risk as a function of car impact speed. Accid Anal Prev 43:25–33CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Aleassa EM, Eid HO, Abu-Zidan FM (2013) Effects of Vehicle size on pedestrian injury pattern and severity: prospective study. World J Surg 37:136–140. doi: 10.1007/s00268-012-1797-4 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Damsere-Derry J, Ebel BE, Mock CN et al (2010) Pedestrians’ injury patterns in Ghana. Accid Anal Prev 42:1080–1088CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Duperrex O, Bunn F, Roberts I (2002) Safety education of pedestrians for injury prevention: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials. BMJ 324(7346):1129CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Turner C, McClure R, Nixon J et al (2004) Community-based programmes to prevent pedestrian injuries in children 0–14 years: a systematic review. Inj Control Saf Promot 11:231–237CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kwan I, Mapstone J (2006) Interventions for increasing pedestrian and cyclist visibility for the prevention of death and injuries. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD003438PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Crandall JR, Bhalla KS, Madeley NJ (2002) Designing road vehicles for pedestrian protection. BMJ 324(7346):1145–1148CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Savolainen PT, Mannering FL, Lord D et al (2011) The statistical analysis of highway crash-injury severities: a review and assessment of methodological alternatives. Accid Anal Prev 43:1666–1676CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Adam SH, Eid HO, Barss P et al (2008) Epidemiology of geriatric trauma in United Arab Emirates. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 47:377–382CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Tefft BC (2013) Impact speed and a pedestrian’s risk of severe injury or death. Accid Anal Prev 50:871–878CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Sparrow WA, Bradshaw EJ, Lamoureux E et al (2002) Ageing effects on the attention demands of walking. Hum Mov Sci 21:961–972CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SurgeryCollege of Medicine and Health Sciences, UAE UniversityAl AinUAE

Personalised recommendations