The Extent of Soft Tissue and Musculoskeletal Injuries after Earthquakes; Describing a Role for Reconstructive Surgeons in an Emergency Response
- 288 Downloads
Earthquakes are the leading cause of natural disaster-related mortality and morbidity. Soft tissue and musculoskeletal injuries are the predominant type of injury seen after these events and a major reason for admission to hospital. Open fractures are relatively common; however, they are resource-intense to manage. Appropriate management is important in minimising amputation rates and preserving function. This review describes the pattern of musculoskeletal and soft-tissue injuries seen after earthquakes and explores the manpower and resource implications involved in their management.
A Medline search was performed, including terms “injury pattern” and “earthquake,” “epidemiology injuries” and “earthquakes,” “plastic surgery,” “reconstructive surgery,” “limb salvage” and “earthquake.” Papers published between December 1992 and December 2012 were included, with no initial language restriction.
Limb injuries are the commonest injuries seen accounting for 60 % of all injuries, with fractures in more than 50 % of those admitted to hospital, with between 8 and 13 % of these fractures open. After the first few days and once the immediate lifesaving phase is over, the management of these musculoskeletal and soft-tissue injuries are the commonest procedures required.
Due to the predominance of soft-tissue and musculoskeletal injuries, plastic surgeons as specialists in soft-tissue reconstruction should be mobilised in the early stages of a disaster response as part of a multidisciplinary team with a focus on limb salvage.
KeywordsLimb Salvage Plastic Surgeon Musculoskeletal Injury Limb Injury Amputation Rate
Conflict of interest
There are no conflicts of interest to declare.
- 4.Wolf Y, Bar-Dayan Y, Mankuta D, Finestone A, Onn E, Morgenstern D, Rand N, Halpern P, Gruzman C, Benedek P, Martinovitz G, Eldad A (2001) An earthquake disaster in Turkey: assessment of the need for plastic surgery services in a crisis intervention field hospital. Plast Reconstr Surg 107(1):163–168 discussion 169–170PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Bar-On E, Lebel E, Kreiss Y, Merin O, Benedict S, Gill A, Lee E, Pirotsky A, Shirov T, Blumberg N (2011) Orthopaedic management in a mega mass casualty situation. The Israel Defence Forces Field Hospital in Haiti following the January 2010 earthquake. Injury 42(10):1053–1059PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Zhang L, Fu P, Wang L, Cai G, Chen D, Guo D, Sun X, Chen F, Bi W, Zeng X, Li H, Liu Z, Wang Y, Huang S, Chen X (2012) The clinical features and outcome of crush patients with acute kidney injury after the Wenchuan earthquake: differences between elderly and younger adults. Injury 43(9):1470–1475PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.EL Ganjouei KA, Iranmanesh E, Poorian P, Sohbati S, Ganjooei NA, Rashid Farokhi F, Karamuzian S (2008) The pattern of injuries among the victims of the Bam earthquake. Iran J Public Health 37(3):70–76Google Scholar
- 15.Pang HN, Lim W, Chua WC, Seet B (2011) Management of musculoskeletal injuries after the 2009 western Sumatra earthquake. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 19(1):3–7Google Scholar
- 27.Lu-Ping Z, Rodriguez-Llanes JM, Qi W, van den Oever B, Westman L, Albela M, Liang P, Gao C, De-Sheng Z, Hughes M, von Schreeb J, Guha-Sapir D (2012) Multiple injuries after earthquakes: a retrospective analysis on 1,871 injured patients from the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake. Crit Care 16(3):R87PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 30.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (2011) Post earthquake injuries treated at a field hospital—Haiti 2010. MMWR 59(51):1673–1677Google Scholar
- 32.Tan CM, Lee VJ, Chang GH, Ang HX, Seet B (2012) Medical response to the 2009 Sumatra earthquake: health needs in the post-disaster period. Singap Med J 53(2):99–103Google Scholar
- 38.MacKenzie EJ, Bosse MJ, Kellam JF, Burgess AR, Webb LX, Swiontkowski MF, Sanders R, Jones AL, McAndrew MP, Patterson B, McCarthy ML, Rohde CA (2002) Factors influencing the decision to amputate or reconstruct after high-energy lower extremity trauma. J Trauma 52(4):641–649PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 39.MacKenzie EJ, Jones AS, Bosse MJ, Castillo RC, Pollak AN, Webb LX, Swiontkowski MF, Kellam JF, Smith DG, Sanders RW, Jones AL, Starr AJ, McAndrew MP, Patterson BM, Burgess AR (2007) Health-care costs associated with amputation or reconstruction of a limb-threatening injury. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89(8):1685–1692PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 46.Angus DC, Pretto EA, Abrams JI, Ceciliano N, Watoh Y, Kirimli B, Certug A, Comfort LK (1997) Epidemiologic assessment of mortality, building collapse pattern, and medical response after the 1992 earthquake in Turkey. Disaster Reanimatology Study Group (DRSG). Prehosp Disaster Med 12(3):222–231PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 48.Giannou C, Baldan M (2009) War surgery: working with limited resources in armed conflict and other situations of violence. International Committee of the Red Cross, GenevaGoogle Scholar
- 49.Williams NS, Bulstrode CJK, O’Connell PR (2008) Bailey and Love’s short practice of surgery. Hodder Arnold, London pp 410–425Google Scholar
- 50.Organisation WH (2011) Coordination and registration of providers of foreign medical teams in the humanitarian response to sudden-onset disasters: a health cluster concept paperGoogle Scholar
- 56.The UK International Emergency Trauma Register. www.uk-med.org/trauma.html. Accessed 13 May 2013
- 57.The Sphere Project (2004) Humanitarian charter and minimum standards in disaster responseGoogle Scholar