World Journal of Surgery

, Volume 38, Issue 7, pp 1622–1625 | Cite as

Disclosure of Surgeon Experience

Article

Abstract

It is uncertain whether there is an ethical obligation to disclose surgical experience. This article explores the impact of principles including respect for patient autonomy, nonmaleficence, and justice, as well as professional duties including truth-telling on the decision-making relevant to the process of informed consent, taking into account surgeon experience, training, and the expected risk and uncertainty surrounding the disease process and operation. Issues such as the integrity of the doctor–patient relationship, difficulties with access to complex surgical services, and limitations in applying statistics to the future outcomes of individual surgeons are explored.

References

  1. 1.
    Katz J (1984) The silent world of doctor and patient. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, pp Xli–xliiGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Siegler M (1985) The progression of medicine: from physician paternalism to patient autonomy to bureaucratic parsimony. Arch Intern Med 145:713–715PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sokol DK (2006) How the doctor’s nose has shortened over time; a historical overview of the truth-telling debate in the doctor-patient relationship. J R Soc Med 99:632–636PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Barry MJ, Edgman-Levitan S (2012) Shared decision making—the pinnacle of patient-centered care. N Engl J Med 366:780–781PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Clarke S, Oakley J (2004) Informed consent and surgeons’ performance. J Med Philos 29:11–35PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Aristotle (1984) The Nichomachean Ethics, 2nd ed.: Irwin T. Hackett Publishing Co. (transl). Irwin T. Hackett Publishing Co, IndianapolisGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Aristotle (2011) Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics, Bartlett RC, Collins SD (transl): The University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Austin JM, D’Andrea G, Birkmeyer JD et al (2014) Safety in numbers: the development of Leapfrog’s composite patient safety score for U.S. Hospitals. J Patient Saf 10(1):64–71PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Begg CB, Cramer LD, Hoskins WJ, Brennan MF (1998) Impact of hospital volume on operative mortality for major cancer surgery. JAMA 280:1747–1751PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Birkmeyer JD, Finlayson SR, Tosteson AN et al (1999) Effect of hospital volume on in-hospital mortality with pancreaticoduodenectomy. Surgery 125:250–256PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Birkmeyer JD, Siewers AE, Finlayson EV et al (2002) Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med 346:1128–1137PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Birkmeyer JD, Stukel TA, Siewers AE et al (2003) Surgeon volume and operative mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med 349:2117–2127PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Goodney PP, Lucas FL, Stukel TA, Birkmeyer JD (2005) Surgeon specialty and operative mortality with lung resection. Ann Surg 241:179–184PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Farjah F, Flum DR, Varghese TK et al (2009) Surgeon specialty and long-term survival after pulmonary resection for lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 87:995–1006PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Vernooij F, Heintz P, Witteveen E, van der Graaf Y (2007) The outcomes of ovarian cancer treatment are better when provided by gynecologic oncologists and in specialized hospitals: a systematic review. Gynecol Oncol 105:801–812PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jang YG, Park MS, Park SS et al (2010) Surgeon subspecialty as a factor in improving long-term outcomes for gastric cancer: twenty years of experience in Korea. Arch Surg 145:1091–1096PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Luft HS, Bunker JP, Enthoven AC (1979) Should operations be regionalized? The empirical relation between surgical volume and mortality. N Engl J Med 301:1364–1369PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Stitzenberg KB, Meropol NJ (2010) Trends in centralization of cancer surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 17:2824–2831PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Finks JF, Osborne NH, Birkmeyer JD (2011) Trends in hospital volume and operative mortality for high-risk surgery. N Engl J Med 364:2128–2137PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ghaferi AA, Dimick JB (2012) Variation in mortality after high-risk cancer surgery: failure to Rescue. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 21:389–395PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Funk LM, Gawande AA, Semel ME et al (2011) Esophagectomy outcomes at low-volume hospitals: the association between systems characteristics and mortality. Ann Surg 253:912–917PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gaster B (1993) The learning curve. JAMA 270:1280PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hatlie MJ (1993) Climbing ‘the learning curve’: New technologies, emerging obligations. JAMA 270:1364–1365PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kouchoukos NT, Cohn LH, Sade RM (2004) Are surgeons ethically obligated to refer patients to other surgeons who achieve better results? Ann Thorac Surg 77:757–760PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Burger I, Schill K, Goodman S (2007) Disclosure of individual surgeon’s performance rates during informed consent: ethical and epistemological considerations. Ann Surg 245:507–513PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Schwarze ML (2007) The process of informed consent: neither the time nor the place for disclosure of surgeon-specific outcomes. Ann Surg 245:514–515PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Keogh B, Spiegelhalter D, Bailey A et al (2004) The legacy of Bristol: public disclosure of individual surgeons’ results. Br Med J 329:450–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Taleb NN (2010) The black swan: the impact of the highly improbable. Random House, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Silver N (2012) The signal and the noise: why so many predictions fail–but some don’t. The Penguin Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Schneider EC, Lieberman T (2001) Publicly disclosed information about the quality of health care: response of the US public. Qual Health Care 10:96–103PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS (2000) To Err is Human: building a safer health system. Institute of Medicine, National Academy Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Tevlin R, Doherty E, Traynor O (2013) Improving disclosure and management of medical error—an opportunity to transform the surgeons of tomorrow. Surgeon 11:338–343PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SurgerySouthern Illinois University School of MedicineSpringfieldUSA

Personalised recommendations