Advertisement

World Journal of Surgery

, Volume 38, Issue 10, pp 2558–2570 | Cite as

Mesh Fixation at Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Meta-Analysis Comparing Tissue Glue and Tack Fixation

  • Nehal S. Shah
  • Catherine Fullwood
  • Ajith K. Siriwardena
  • Aali J. Sheen
Article

Abstract

Background

The aim of this study was to conduct a comprehensive systematic review comparing tissue glue (TG) against tacks/staples for mesh fixation in laparoscopic (totally extra-peritoneal and trans-abdominal pre-peritoneal) groin hernia repair with the incidence of post-operative chronic pain as the primary outcome measure.

Methods

A computerized search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases for the period from 1 January 1,990 to 30 June 2013 produced 39 reports. The quality of reports was assessed according to criteria reported by the Cochrane communication review group.

Results

Five randomized controlled trials (RCTs, 491 patients) and five non-RCTs (1,034 patients) fulfilled the selection criteria. A meta-analysis of chronic pain from the five RCTs gave a statistically significant Peto odds ratio (OR) of 0.40 (0.21–0.76; p = 0.005) indicating that the TG group experience less chronic pain. Although the studies are underpowered to detect recurrence, the meta-analysis of the recurrence rates from the RCTs identified no difference between tacks/staple and glue fixation (OR 2.36; 0.67–8.37). There were also no differences found in meta-analysis of seroma and hematoma formation between the two methods of fixation. The wide variation in time points regarding pain score meant it was not possible to combine the studies and perform analysis for pain score with earlier time points.

Conclusions

Meta-analysis of RCTs comparing TG with tack fixation in laparoscopic inguinal hernia surgery depicts a significant reduction in chronic pain with no increase in recurrence rates. Early post-operative outcome is similar after both methods of mesh fixation, although larger RCTs are required, with long-term pain as the primary endpoint.

Keywords

Chronic Pain Fibrin Glue Fibrin Sealant Mesh Fixation Seroma Formation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Conflict of interest

None of the authors have any known conflicts of interest (financial, professional, or personal) in relation to this work.

Financial support

The service of a medical writer (ME Appleyard) was funded by Baxter Healthcare Limited.

References

  1. 1.
    National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2004) Laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernia repair. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidance 2004, TA83. Available at: http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/live/11542/32924/32924.pdf. Accessed 5 June 2013
  2. 2.
    McCormack K, Scott NW, Go PM, Ross S et al (2003) EU Hernia Trialists Collaboration. Laparoscopic techniques versus open techniques for inguinal hernia repair. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1:CD001785PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Köninger J, Redecke J, Butters M (2004) Chronic pain after hernia repair: a randomized trial comparing Shouldice Lichtenstein and TAPP. Langenbecks Arch Surg 389(5):361–365PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Simons MP, Aufenacker T, Bay-Nielsen M et al (2009) European Hernia Society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients. Hernia 13(4):343–403PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hindmarsh AC, Cheong E, Lewis MP et al (2003) Attendance at a pain clinic with severe chronic pain after open and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repairs. Br J Surg 90(9):1152–1154PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kaul A, Hutfless S, Le H, Hamed SA et al (2012) Staple versus fibrin glue fixation in laparoscopic total extraperitoneal repair of inguinal hernia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 26(5):1269–1278PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lau H, Patil NG (2003) Selective non-stapling of mesh during unilateral endoscopic total extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty: a case-control study. Arch Surg 138(12):1352–1355PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Topart P, Vandenbroucke F, Lozac’h P (2005) Tisseel versus tack staples as mesh fixation in totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic repair of groin hernias: a retrospective analysis. Surg Endosc 19(5):724–727PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Taylor C, Layani L, Liew V et al (2008) Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair without mesh fixation, early results of a large randomised clinical trial. Surg Endosc 22(3):757–762PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Stark E, Oestreich K, Wendl K et al (1999) Nerve irritation after laparoscopic hernia repair. Surg Endosc 13(9):878–881PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Felix E, Scott S, Crafton B et al (1998) Causes of recurrence after laparoscopic hernioplasty. A multicenter study. Surg Endosc 12(3):226–231PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shah NS, Bandara AI, Sheen AJ (2012) Clinical outcome and quality of life in 100 consecutive laparoscopic totally extra-peritoneal (TEP) groin hernia repairs using fibrin glue (Tisseel™): a United Kingdom experience. Hernia 16(6):647–653PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Schwab R, Willms A, Kröger A et al (2006) Less chronic pain following mesh fixation using a fibrin sealant in TEP inguinal hernia repair. Hernia 10(3):272–277PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Novik B, Hagedorn S, Mörk UB et al (2006) Fibrin glue for securing the mesh in laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: a study with a 40-month prospective follow-up period. Surg Endosc 20(3):462–467PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Katkhouda N, Mavor E, Friedlander MH et al (2001) Use of fibrin sealant for prosthetic mesh fixation in laparoscopic extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair. Ann Surg 233(1):18–25PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Olmi S, Erba L, Bertolini A et al (2006) Fibrin glue for mesh fixation in laparoscopic transabdominalpreperitoneal (TAPP) hernia repair: indications, technique, and outcomes. Surg Endosc 20(12):1846–1850PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sajid MS, Ladwa N, Kalra L et al (2013) A meta-analysis examining the use of tacker mesh fixation versus glue mesh fixation in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Am J Surg 206(1):103–111PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lovisetto F, Zonta S, Rota E et al (2007) Use of human fibrin glue (Tissucol) versus staples for mesh fixation in laparoscopic transabdominalpreperitonealhernioplasty: a prospective, randomized study. Ann Surg 245(2):222–231PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wells GA, Shea B, O’Connell D et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. Ottawa: Ottawa Hospital Research Institute. Available at: http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp. Accessed 2 Apr 2012)
  20. 20.
    Ryan R, Hill S, Broclain D et al (2007) Cochrane Consumers and Communication Review Group. Study quality guide. Available at: http://www.latrobe.edu.au/cochrane/resources.html. Accessed 26 Mar 2010)
  21. 21.
    Peto R, Collins R, Gray R (1995) Large-scale randomized evidence: large simple trials and overviews of trials. J Clin Epidemiol 48(1):23–40PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Deeks JJ, Altman DG, Bradburn MJ (2001) Statistical methods for examining heterogeneity and combining results from several studies in meta-analysis. In: Egger M, Smith GD, Altman DG (eds) Systemic reviews in health care: meta-analysis in context, 2nd edn. BMJ Publishing, London, pp 285–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Brügger L, Bloesch M, Ipaktchi R et al (2012) Objective hypoesthesia and pain after transabdominal preperitoneal hernioplasty: a prospective, randomized study comparing tissue adhesive versus spiral tacks. Surg Endosc 26(4):1079–1085PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Boldo E, Armelles A, Perez de Lucia G et al (2008) Pain after laparascopic bilateral hernioplasty: early results of a prospective randomized double-blind study comparing fibrin versus staples. Surg Endosc 22(5):1206–1209PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Tolver MA, Rosenberg J, Juul P et al (2013) Randomized clinical trial of fibrin glue versus tacked fixation in laparoscopic groin hernia repair. Surg Endosc 27(8):2727–2733PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ceccarelli G, Casciola L, Pisanelli MC et al (2008) Comparing fibrin sealant with staples for mesh fixation in laparoscopic transabdominal hernia repair: a case control-study. Surg Endosc 22(3):668–673PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Santoro E, Agresta F, Buscaglia F et al (2007) Preliminary experience using fibrin glue for mesh fixation in 250 patients undergoing minilaparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 17(1):12–15PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Courtney CA, Duffy K, Serpell MG et al (2002) Outcome of patients with severe chronic pain following repair of groin hernia. Br J Surg 89:1310–1314PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lowham AS, Filipi CJ, Fitzgibbons RJ et al (1997) Mechanisms of hernia recurrence after preperitoneal mesh repair. Traditional and laparoscopic. Ann Surg 225(4):422–431PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Horisberger K, Jung MK, Zingg U et al (2013) Influence of type of mesh fixation in endoscopic totally extraperitoneal hernia repair (TEP) on long-term quality of life. World J Surg 37(6):1249–1257 10.1007/s00268-013-1974-0PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Douek M, Smith G, Oshowo A et al (2003) Prospective randomised controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia mesh repair: five year follow up. BMJ 326:1012–1013PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Spotnitz WD, Falstrom JK, Rodeheaver GT et al (1997) The role of sutures and fibrin sealant in wound healing. Surg Clin North Am 77(3):651–669PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Fortelny RH, Petter-Puchner AH, May C et al (2012) The impact of atraumatic fibrin sealant vs. staple mesh fixation in TAPP hernia repair on chronic pain and quality of life: results of a randomized controlled study. Surg Endosc 26(1):249–254PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Olmi S, Scaini A, Erba L et al (2007) Quantification of pain in laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernioplasty identifies marked differences between prosthesis fixation systems. Surgery 142(1):40–46PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Melissa CS, Bun TA, Wing CK et al (2014) Randomized double-blinded prospective trial of fibrin sealant spray versus mechanical stapling in laparoscopic total extraperitoneal hernioplasty. Ann Surg 259(3):432–437PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Bittner R, Arregui ME, Bisgaard T et al (2011) Guidelines for laparoscopic (TAPP) and endoscopic (TEP) treatment of inguinal hernia [International Endohernia Society (IEHS)]. Surg Endosc 25(9):2773–2843PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nehal S. Shah
    • 1
  • Catherine Fullwood
    • 2
  • Ajith K. Siriwardena
    • 1
  • Aali J. Sheen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Surgery, Manchester Royal InfirmaryUniversity of ManchesterManchesterUK
  2. 2.Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research CentreThe University of ManchesterManchesterUK

Personalised recommendations