Advertisement

World Journal of Surgery

, Volume 38, Issue 8, pp 1922–1928 | Cite as

Trans Rectus Sheath Extra-Peritoneal Procedure (TREPP) for Inguinal Hernia: The First 1,000 Patients

  • J. F. M. Lange
  • M. M. Lange
  • D. A. Voropai
  • M. W. A. van Tilburg
  • J. P. E. N. Pierie
  • R. J. Ploeg
  • W. L. Akkersdijk
Article

Abstract

Introduction

After the introduction of mesh in inguinal hernia repair, the focus to improve surgical technique has changed from recurrence to chronic postoperative inguinal pain. At present, the most common surgical techniques are the Lichtenstein hernioplasty and total extraperitoneal procedure. Both techniques have their own specific disadvantages, with regard to potential nerve damage and the necessity of general anesthesia, respectively.

Objective

The goal of this study was to evaluate the results of a new technique in which the inguinal nerves are not at risk, and in which general anesthesia is not needed: trans rectus sheath extraperitoneal procedure (TREPP).

Material and methods

Between 2006 and 2010, a total of 1,000 patients were treated for inguinal hernia with TREPP. A questionnaire concerning pain, sensibility changes, patient satisfaction, and recurrence was sent to all patients.

Results

The questionnaire was completed by 932 patients. Almost 90 % of patients had not experienced any pain since the surgical procedure; 8 % of patients reported experiencing some pain, but less than preoperatively; and 2 % of patients reported an increase in pain postoperatively. Recurrence occurred in 1 and 3 % were unsure about this. Reduced sensibility of the scar, scrotum, and upper leg was reported by 12.4, 1.4, and 1.5 %, respectively. Overall, 97.4 % of patients were satisfied with the results of the surgical procedure. The time period in which TREPP was performed was not associated with any of the outcome measures.

Conclusion

TREPP has proven to be a feasible new technique for inguinal hernia repair, with excellent results, justifying a randomized controlled trial in which TREPP should be compared with standard techniques.

Keywords

Inguinal Hernia Visual Analog Scale Score Inguinal Hernia Repair Recurrent Hernia Femoral Hernia 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Jenkins JT, O’Dwyer PJ (2008) Inguinal hernias. BMJ 336(7638):269–272PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Eklund AS, Montgomery AK, Rasmussen IC et al (2009) Low recurrence rate after laparoscopic (TEP) and open (Lichtenstein) inguinal hernia repair: a randomized, multicentre trial with 5 year follow up. Ann Surg 249(1):33–38PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    McCormack K, Scott NW, Go PM et al (2003) Laparoscopic techniques versus open techniques for inguinal hernia repair. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (1): CD001785Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Takata MC, Duh QY (2008) Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Surg Clin North Am 88(1):157–178PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Scott NW, McCormack K, Graham P, Go PM, Ross SJ, Grant AM (2002) Open mesh versus non-mesh for repair of femoral and inguinal hernia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (4): CD002197Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kehlet H (2008) Chronic pain after groin hernia repair. Br J Surg 95:135–136PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Poobalan AS, Bruce J, Smith WC, King PM, Krukowski ZH, Chambers WA (2003) A review of chronic pain after inguinal herniorrhaphy. Clin J Pain 19:48–54PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wijsmuller AR, Lange JF, van Geldere D, Simons MP, Kleinrensink GJ, Hop WC, Jeekel J, Lange JF (2007) Surgical techniques preventing chronic pain after Lichtenstein hernia repair: state-of-the-art vs daily practice in the Netherlands. Hernia 11(2):147–151PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Aasvang EK, Kehlet H (2009) The effect of mesh removal and selective neurectomy on persistent postherniotomy pain. Ann Surg 249(2):327–334PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kato Y, Yamataka A, Miyano G et al (2005) Tissue adhesives for repairing inguinal hernia: a preliminary study. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 15(4):424–428PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hallen M, Bergenfelz A, Westerdahl J (2008) Laparoscopic extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair versus open mesh repair: long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. Surgery 143(3):313–317PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tantia O, Jain M, Khanna S et al (2009) Laparoscopic repair of recurrent groin hernia: results of a prospective study. Surg Endosc 23(4):734–738PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kuhry E, van Veen RN, Langeveld HR, Steyerberg EW, Jeekel J, Bonjer HJ (2007) Open or endoscopic extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair? A systematic review. Surg Endosc 21:161–166PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Horeyseck G, Roland F, Rolfes N (1996) TAPP versus Lichtenstein. Chirurg 67(10):1036–1040PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Edwards CC II, Bailey RW (2000) Laparoscopic hernia repair: the learning curve. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 10:15–149Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kugel RD (2003) The Kugel repair for groin hernias. Surg Clin North Am 83(5):1119–1139PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ugahary F, Simmermacher RKJ (1998) Groin hernia repair via a grid-iron incision: an alternative technique for preperitoneal mesh insertion. Hernia 2:123–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wantz GE (1993) The technique of giant prosthetic reinforcement of the visceral sac performed through an anterior groin incision. Surg Gynecol Obstet 176(5):497–500PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pelissier EP (2006) Inguinal hernia: preperitoneal placement of memory-ring patch by anterior approach. Hernia 10(3):248–252PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Melzack R (2005) The McGill pain questionnaire; from description to measurement. Anesthesiology 103(1):199–202PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Aasvang E, Kehlet H (2005) Chronic postoperative pain: the case of inguinal herniorrhaphy. Br J Anaesth 95(1):69–76PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Poobalan AS, Bruce J, King PM, Chambers WA, Krukowski ZH, Smith WCS (2001) Chronic pain and quality of life following open inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 88:1122–1126PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Nienhuijs SW, Boelens O, Strobbe LJA (2005) Pain after anterior hernia repair. J Am Coll Surg 200:885–889PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bay-Nielsen M, Perkins FM, Kehlet H (2001) Pain and functional impairment 1 year after inguinal herniorrhaphy: a nationwide questionnaire study. Ann Surg 233:1–7PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Callesen T, Bech K, Kehlet H (1999) Prospective study of chronic pain after groin hernia repair. Br J Surg 86:1528–1531PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Cunningham J, Temple WJ, Mitchell P, Nixon JA, Preshaw RM, Hagen NA (1996) Cooperative hernia study: pain in the postrepair patient. Ann Surg 224:598–602PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Courtney CA, Duffy K, Serpell MG, O’Dwyer PJ (2002) Outcome of patients with severe chronic pain following repair of groin hernia. Br J Surg 89:1310–1314PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Liem MSL, van der Graaf Y, van Steensel C, Boelhouwer RU, Clevers G-J, Meijer WS, Stassen LPS, Vente JP, Weidema WF, Schrijvers AJP, van Vroonhoven TJMV (1997) Comparison of conventional anterior surgery and laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernia repair. N Engl J Med 336:1541–1547PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Neumayer L, Giobbie-Hurder A, Jonasson O et al (2004) Open mesh versus laparoscopic mesh repair of inguinal hernia. N Engl J Med 350:1819–1827PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Grant AM, Scott NW, O’Dwyer PJ, on behalf of the MRC Laparoscopic Groin Hernia Trial Group (2004) Five year follow-up of a randomised trial to assess pain and numbness after laparoscopic or open repair of groin hernia. Br J Surg 91:1570–1574PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Amid PK (2004) Lichtenstein tension-free hernioplasty: its inception, evolution and principles. Hernia 8(1):1–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Lange JF, Wijsmuller AR, van Geldere D, Simons MP, Swart R, Oomen J, Kleinrensink GJ, Jeekel J, Lange JF (2009) Feasibillity study of three-nerve-recognizing Lichtenstein procedure for inguinal hernia. Br J Surg 96(10):1210–1214PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Loos MJ, Roumen RM, Scheltinga MR (2007) Chronic sequelae of common elective groin hernia repair. Hernia 11:169–173PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ali SM, Zendejas B, Hernandez-Irrizari RC, Lohse CM, Farley DR (2013) Predictors of chronic groin discomfort after laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair. J Am Coll Surg 217(1):27–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Vos PM, Simons MP, Luitse JS, van Geldere D, Koelemaij MJ, Obertop H (1998) Follow-up after inguinal hernia repair. Questionnaire compared with physical examination; a prospective study in 299 patients. Eur J Surg 164(7):533–536PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. F. M. Lange
    • 1
  • M. M. Lange
    • 2
  • D. A. Voropai
    • 3
  • M. W. A. van Tilburg
    • 3
  • J. P. E. N. Pierie
    • 4
    • 5
  • R. J. Ploeg
    • 1
    • 6
  • W. L. Akkersdijk
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryUniversity Medical Centre GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of SurgeryZaans Medisch CentrumZaandamThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Department of SurgerySt. Jansdal HospitalHarderwijkThe Netherlands
  4. 4.Department of SurgeryMedical Centre LeeuwardenLeeuwardenThe Netherlands
  5. 5.Postgraduate School of Medicine, University Medical Centre GroningenUniversity GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands
  6. 6.Nuffield Department of Surgical SciencesUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations