Advertisement

World Journal of Surgery

, Volume 38, Issue 6, pp 1405–1410 | Cite as

Factors Affecting Success Rate of Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) Courses

  • Fikri M. Abu-ZidanEmail author
  • Alshafi Mohammad
  • Abdulla Jamal
  • Diane Chetty
  • Subash C. Gautam
  • Murray van Dyke
  • Frank J. Branicki
Article

Abstract

Background

The aim of the present study was to define the factors that affect passing the assessments for successful completion of the Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) Provider Courses in the United Arab Emirates (UAE).

Methods

The ATLS Provider Course has been taught in three medical centers in the UAE since 2004. A total of 1,041 doctors completed the course during the period 2004–2010. A special protocol was designed to enter data accrued for each course, participants’ demographics, and assessments, including the final results. Direct logistic regression was performed to define factors affecting success in multiple choice questions (MCQ) and in the practical initial assessment station exam. The studied variables included the year, the course site, speciality, level of practice, and pre-test score.

Results

The majority of participants were surgeons (33.2 %), followed by Emergency Medicine physicians (27.3 %). The logistic regression model showed that having a low pre-test score (p < 0.0001) and being a family medicine practitioner (p < 0.0001) increased the likelihood of failing the MCQ exam. The chance of passing the end of course practical exam increased with time (p = 0.002). A low pre-test score (p < 0.0001) and being examined in site A (p = 0.04) increased the chance of failing in the initial assessment exam. The pass rate for the ATLS exam significantly increased after adoption of the interactive approach to teaching.

Conclusions

Prior knowledge and preparation is essential to passing the ATLS exam. Doctors who deal clinically with all aspects of airway, breathing, and circulation of the ATLS course are more likely to pass the MCQ exam in our setting, followed by those who usually manage only the circulation or disability aspects of ATLS. It is possible that the interactive approach to teaching ATLS has improved the overall ATLS success rate.

Keywords

United Arab Emirate Multiple Choice Question Emergency Physician Pass Rate Interactive Approach 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Conflict of interest

All of the authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Collicott PE (2001) ATLS celebrates 25th anniversary. Bull Am Coll Surg 90:18–21Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Drimousis PG, Theodorou D, Toutouzas K et al (2011) Advanced Trauma Life Support certified physicians in a non trauma system setting: is it enough? Resuscitation 82:180–184PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ben-Abraham R, Weinbroum AA, Kluger Y et al (2000) Pediatricians and the Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS): time for reconsideration? Isr Med Assoc J 2:513–516PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Campbell B, Heal J, Evans S et al (2000) What do trainees think about Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS)? Ann R Coll Surg Engl 82:263–267PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kool DR, Blickman JG (2007) Advanced Trauma Life Support. ABCDE from a radiological point of view. Emerg Radiol 14:135–141PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Advanced Trauma Life Support for Doctors, UAE Chapter. http://www.traumauae.com/. Accessed 15 June 2013
  7. 7.
    Ali I, Cohen R, Reznick R (1995) Demonstration of acquisition of trauma management skills by senior medical students completing the ATLS Program. J Trauma 38:687–691PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Blumenfeld A, Ben Abraham R, Stein M et al (1997) The accumulated experience of the Israeli Advanced Trauma Life Support program. J Am Coll Surg 185:8–12PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ben-Abraham R, Stein M, Paret G et al (1999) Factors contributing to physicians’ success in the Advanced Trauma Life Support Program in Israel. Isr Med Assoc J 1:169–171PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Carley S, Driscoll P (2001) Trauma education. Resuscitation 48:47–56PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Carmont MR (2005) The Advanced Trauma Life Support course: a history of its development and review of related literature. Postgrad Med J 81:87–91PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    American College of Surgeons (2004) Advanced Trauma Life Support for Doctors, 7th edn. American College of Surgeons, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    American College of Surgeons (2008) Advanced Trauma Life Support for Doctors, 8th edn. American College of Surgeons, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma (2006) Resources for optimal care of the injured patient. American College of Surgeons, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Aprahamian C, Nelson KT, Thompson BM et al (1984) The relationship of the level of training and area of medical specialization with registrant performance in an advanced trauma life-support course. J Emerg Med 2:137–140PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Girdley FM, Cohen DJ, Birnbaum ML et al (1993) Advanced trauma life support: assessment of cognitive achievement. Mil Med 158:623–627PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ali J, Howard M, Williams JI (2003) Do factors other than trauma volume affect attrition of ATLS-acquired skills? J Trauma 54:835–841PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mohammad A, Branicki F, Abu-Zidan FM (2013) Educational and clinical impact of Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) Courses: a systematic review. World J Surg. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-2294-0 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ali J, Howard M (1992) The Advanced Trauma Life Support course for senior medical students. Can J Surg 35:541–545PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ali J, Adam RU, Josa D et al (1999) Comparison of performance of interns completing the old (1993) and new interactive (1997) Advanced Trauma Life Support courses. J Trauma 46:80–86PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Papp KK, Miller FB (1995) A required trauma lecture series for junior medical students. J Trauma 38:2–4PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ben Abraham R, Blumenfeld A, Stein M et al (1998) Advanced trauma life support versus Combat Trauma Life Support courses: a comparison of cognitive knowledge decline. Mil Med 163:747–749PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kennedy DW, Gentleman D (2001) The ATLS course, a survey of 228 ATLS providers. Emerg Med J 18:55–58PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Quilici AP, Pogetti RS, Fontes B et al (2005) Is the Advanced Trauma Life Support simulation exam more stressful for the surgeon than emergency department trauma care? Clinics (Sao Paulo) 60:287–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ali J, Dunn J, Eason M et al (2010) Comparing the standardized live trauma patient and the mechanical simulator models in the ATLS initial assessment station. J Surg Res 162:7–10PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ali J, Adam R, Stedman M et al (1994) Cognitive and attitudinal impact of the Advanced Trauma Life Support program in a developing country. J Trauma 36:695–702PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fikri M. Abu-Zidan
    • 1
    Email author
  • Alshafi Mohammad
    • 1
  • Abdulla Jamal
    • 1
  • Diane Chetty
    • 2
  • Subash C. Gautam
    • 3
  • Murray van Dyke
    • 4
  • Frank J. Branicki
    • 1
  1. 1.Trauma Group, Department of Surgery, College of Medicine and Health SciencesUAE UniversityAl AinUnited Arab Emirates
  2. 2.Life Support Training CentreTawam HospitalAl AinUnited Arab Emirates
  3. 3.Department of SurgeryFujairah HospitalAl FujairahUnited Arab Emirates
  4. 4.Department of Emergency MedicineSheikh Khalifa Medical CityAbu DhabiUnited Arab Emirates

Personalised recommendations