Advertisement

World Journal of Surgery

, Volume 38, Issue 5, pp 1127–1140 | Cite as

Is Current Perioperative Practice in Hepatic Surgery Based on Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Principles?

  • E. M. Wong-Lun-HingEmail author
  • R. M. van Dam
  • L. A. Heijnen
  • O. R. C. Busch
  • T. Terkivatan
  • R. van Hillegersberg
  • G. D. Slooter
  • J. Klaase
  • J. H. W. de Wilt
  • K. Bosscha
  • U. P. Neumann
  • B. Topal
  • L. A. Aldrighetti
  • C. H. C. Dejong
Article

Abstract

Background

The worldwide introduction of multimodal enhanced recovery programs has also changed perioperative care in patients who undergo liver resection. This study was performed to assess current perioperative practice in liver surgery in 11 European HPB centers and compare it to enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) principles.

Methods

In each unit, 15 consecutive patients (N = 165) who underwent hepatectomy between 2010 and 2012 were retrospectively analyzed. Compliance was classified as “full,” “partial,” or “poor” whenever ≥80, ≥50, or <50 % of the 22 ERAS protocol core items were met. The primary study end point was overall compliance with the ERAS core program per unit and per perioperative phase.

Results

Most patients were operated on for malignancy (91 %) and 56 % were minor hepatectomies. The median number of implemented ERAS core items was 9 (range = 7–12) across all centers. Compliance was partial in the preoperative (median 2 of 3 items, range = 1–3) and perioperative phases (median 5 of 10 items, range: 4–7). Median postoperative compliance was poor (median 2 of 9 items, range = 0–4). A statistically significant difference was observed between median length of stay and median time to recovery (7 vs. 5 days, P < 0.001).

Conclusion

Perioperative care among centers that perform liver resections varied substantially. In current HPB surgical practice, some elements of the ERAS program, e.g., preoperative counselling and minimal fasting, have already been implemented. Elements in the perioperative phase (avoidance of drains and nasogastric tube) and postoperative phase (early resumption of oral intake, early mobilization, and use of recovery criteria) should be further optimized.

Keywords

Central Venous Pressure Parenchymal Transection Core Item PONV Prophylaxis Perform Liver Resection 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank all participating centers for their support and contribution to this study: in the Netherlands: Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht; Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam; Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam; University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht; Maxima Medical Center, Veldhoven; Medical Spectrum Twente, Enschede; Jeroen Bosch Hospital, Den Bosch; Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen; in Belgium: University Hospital Leuven, Leuven; in Germany: University Hospital Aachen, Aachen; and in Italy: San Raffaele Hospital, Milan.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Kehlet H, Wilmore DW (2002) Multimodal strategies to improve surgical outcome. Am J Surg 183(6):630–641PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Spanjersberg WR, Reurings J, Keus F, van Laarhoven CJ (2011) Fast track surgery versus conventional recovery strategies for colorectal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2:CD007635PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    MacKay G, O’Dwyer PJ (2008) Early discharge following liver resection for colorectal metastases. Scott Med J 53(2):22–24PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    van Dam RM, Hendry PO, Coolsen MM, Bemelmans MH, Lassen K, Revhaug A et al (2008) Initial experience with a multimodal enhanced recovery programme in patients undergoing liver resection. Br J Surg 95(8):969–975PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hendry PO, van Dam RM, Bukkems SF, McKeown DW, Parks RW, Preston T et al (2010) Randomized clinical trial of laxatives and oral nutritional supplements within an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol following liver resection. Br J Surg 97(8):1198–1206PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lin DX, Li X, Ye QW, Lin F, Li LL, Zhang QY (2011) Implementation of a fast-track clinical pathway decreases postoperative length of stay and hospital charges for liver resection. Cell Biochem Biophys 61(2):413–419PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Coolsen MM, Wong-Lun-Hing EM, van Dam RM, van der Wilt AA, Slim K, Lassen K et al (2013) A systematic review of outcomes in patients undergoing liver surgery in an enhanced recovery after surgery pathways. HPB (Oxford) 15(4):245–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sanchez-Perez B, Aranda-Narvaez JM, Suarez-Munoz MA, Eladel-Delfresno M, Fernandez-Aguilar JL, Perez-Daga JA et al (2012) Fast-track program in laparoscopic liver surgery: theory or fact? World J Gastrointest Surg 4(11):246–250PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ni CY, Yang Y, Chang YQ, Cai H, Xu B, Yang F et al (2013) Fast-track surgery improves postoperative recovery in patients undergoing partial hepatectomy for primary liver cancer: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Eur J Surg Oncol 39(6):542–547PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schultz NA, Larsen PN, Klarskov B, Plum LM, Frederiksen HJ, Christensen BM et al (2013) Evaluation of a fast-track programme for patients undergoing liver resection. Br J Surg 100(1):138–143PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wong-Lun-Hing EM, Lodewick TM, Stoot JH, Bemelmans MH, Olde Damink SH, Dejong CH et al (2012) A survey in the hepatopancreatobiliary community on ways to enhance patient recovery. HPB (Oxford) 14(12):818–827CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Brustia P, Renghi A, Gramaglia L, Porta C, Cassatella R, De Angelis R et al (2003) Mininvasive abdominal aortic surgery. Early recovery and reduced hospitalization after multidisciplinary approach. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 44(5):629–635Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Barbieri A, Vanhaecht K, Van Herck P, Sermeus W, Faggiano F, Marchisio S et al (2009) Effects of clinical pathways in the joint replacement: a meta-analysis. BMC Med 7:32PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Arsalani-Zadeh R, ElFadl D, Yassin N, MacFie J (2011) Evidence-based review of enhancing postoperative recovery after breast surgery. Br J Surg 98(2):181–196PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rawlinson A, Kang P, Evans J, Khanna A (2011) A systematic review of enhanced recovery protocols in colorectal surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 93(8):583–588PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Spelt L, Ansari D, Sturesson C, Tingstedt B, Andersson R (2011) Fast-track programmes for hepatopancreatic resections: where do we stand? HPB (Oxford) 13(12):833–838CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lassen K, Coolsen MM, Slim K, Carli F, de Aguilar-Nascimento JE, Schafer M et al (2012) Guidelines for perioperative care for pancreaticoduodenectomy: enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS®) society recommendations. Clin Nutr 31(6):817–830PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Vlug MS, Wind J, Hollmann MW, Ubbink DT, Cense HA, Engel AF et al (2011) Laparoscopy in combination with fast track multimodal management is the best perioperative strategy in patients undergoing colonic surgery: a randomized clinical trial (LAFA-study). Ann Surg 254(6):868–875PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Maessen J, Dejong CH, Hausel J, Nygren J, Lassen K, Andersen J et al (2007) A protocol is not enough to implement an enhanced recovery programme for colorectal resection. Br J Surg 94(2):224–231PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    van Dam RM, Wong-Lun-Hing EM, van Breukelen GJ, Stoot JH, van der Vorst JR, Bemelmans MH et al (2012) Open versus laparoscopic left lateral hepatic sectionectomy within an enhanced recovery ERAS® programme (ORANGE II-Trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 13(1):54PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Fong Y, Gonen M, Rubin D, Radzyner M, Brennan MF (2005) Long-term survival is superior after resection for cancer in high-volume centers. Ann Surg 242(4):540–544 discussion 544–547PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Maessen JM, Hoff C, Jottard K, Kessels AG, Bremers AJ, Havenga K et al (2009) To eat or not to eat: facilitating early oral intake after elective colonic surgery in the Netherlands. Clin Nutr 28(1):29–33PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gillissen F, Hoff C, Maessen JM, Winkens B, Teeuwen JH, von Meyenfeldt MF et al (2013) Structured synchronous implementation of an enhanced recovery program in elective colonic surgery in 33 hospitals in The Netherlands. World J Surg 37(5):1082–1093. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-1938-4 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Disbrow EA, Bennett HL, Owings JT (1993) Effect of preoperative suggestion on postoperative gastrointestinal motility. West J Med 158(5):488–492PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kiecolt-Glaser JK, Page GG, Marucha PT, MacCallum RC, Glaser R (1998) Psychological influences on surgical recovery. Perspectives from psychoneuroimmunology. Am Psychol 53(11):1209–1218PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Walker KJ, Smith AF (2009) Premedication for anxiety in adult day surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD002192PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Gurusamy KS, Samraj K, Davidson BR (2007) Routine abdominal drainage for uncomplicated liver resection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3:CD006232PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Nelson R, Tse B, Edwards S (2005) Systematic review of prophylactic nasogastric decompression after abdominal operations. Br J Surg 92(6):673–680PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Pessaux P, Regimbeau JM, Dondero F, Plasse M, Mantz J, Belghiti J (2007) Randomized clinical trial evaluating the need for routine nasogastric decompression after elective hepatic resection. Br J Surg 94(3):297–303PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lesurtel M, Selzner M, Petrowsky H, McCormack L, Clavien PA (2005) How should transection of the liver be performed? A prospective randomized study in 100 consecutive patients: comparing four different transection strategies. Ann Surg 242(6):814–822 discussion 822–823PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wang WD, Liang LJ, Huang XQ, Yin XY (2006) Low central venous pressure reduces blood loss in hepatectomy. World J Gastroenterol 12(6):935–939PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    McNally SJ, Revie EJ, Massie LJ, McKeown DW, Parks RW, Garden OJ et al (2012) Factors in perioperative care that determine blood loss in liver surgery. HPB (Oxford) 14(4):236–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ong CK, Seymour RA, Lirk P, Merry AF (2010) Combining paracetamol (acetaminophen) with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs: a qualitative systematic review of analgesic efficacy for acute postoperative pain. Anesth Analg 110(4):1170–1179PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Cook TM, Counsell D, Wildsmith JA (2009) Major complications of central neuraxial block: report on the third national audit project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists. Br J Anaesth 102(2):179–190PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    McLeod G, Davies H, Munnoch N, Bannister J, MacRae W (2001) Postoperative pain relief using thoracic epidural analgesia: outstanding success and disappointing failures. Anaesthesia 56(1):75–81PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Basu S, Tamijmarane A, Bulters D, Wells JK, John TG, Rees M (2004) An alternative method of wound pain control following hepatic resection: a preliminary study. HPB (Oxford) 6(3):186–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Liu SS, Richman JM, Thirlby RC, Wu CL (2006) Efficacy of continuous wound catheters delivering local anesthetic for postoperative analgesia: a quantitative and qualitative systematic review of randomized controlled trials. J Am Coll Surg 203(6):914–932PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Forastiere E, Sofra M, Giannarelli D, Fabrizi L, Simone G (2008) Effectiveness of continuous wound infusion of 0.5 % ropivacaine by on-Q pain relief system for postoperative pain management after open nephrectomy. Br J Anaesth 101(6):841–847PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    De Pietri L, Siniscalchi A, Reggiani A, Masetti M, Begliomini B, Gazzi M et al (2006) The use of intrathecal morphine for postoperative pain relief after liver resection: a comparison with epidural analgesia. Anesth Analg 102(4):1157–1163PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Koea JB, Young Y, Gunn K (2009) Fast track liver resection: the effect of a comprehensive care package and analgesia with single dose intrathecal morphine with gabapentin or continuous epidural analgesia. HPB Surg 2009:271986PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Revie EJ, McKeown DW, Wilson JA, Garden OJ, Wigmore SJ (2012) Randomized clinical trial of local infiltration plus patient-controlled opiate analgesia versus epidural analgesia following liver resection surgery. HPB (Oxford) 14(9):611–618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Lentschener C, Ozier Y (2002) Anaesthesia for elective liver resection: some points should be revisited. Eur J Anaesthesiol 19(11):780–788PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Zhu P, Lau WY, Chen YF, Zhang BX, Huang ZY, Zhang ZW et al (2012) Randomized clinical trial comparing infrahepatic inferior vena cava clamping with low central venous pressure in complex liver resections involving the Pringle manoeuvre. Br J Surg 99(6):781–788PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Andersen HK, Lewis SJ, Thomas S (2006) Early enteral nutrition within 24 h of colorectal surgery versus later commencement of feeding for postoperative complications. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD004080PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Lassen K, Kjaeve J, Fetveit T, Trano G, Sigurdsson HK, Horn A et al (2008) Allowing normal food at will after major upper gastrointestinal surgery does not increase morbidity: a randomized multicenter trial. Ann Surg 247(5):721–729PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Ahmed J, Khan S, Gatt M, Kallam R, MacFie J (2010) Compliance with enhanced recovery programmes in elective colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 97(5):754–758PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. M. Wong-Lun-Hing
    • 1
    Email author
  • R. M. van Dam
    • 1
    • 9
  • L. A. Heijnen
    • 1
  • O. R. C. Busch
    • 2
  • T. Terkivatan
    • 3
  • R. van Hillegersberg
    • 4
  • G. D. Slooter
    • 5
  • J. Klaase
    • 6
  • J. H. W. de Wilt
    • 7
  • K. Bosscha
    • 8
  • U. P. Neumann
    • 1
    • 9
  • B. Topal
    • 10
  • L. A. Aldrighetti
    • 11
  • C. H. C. Dejong
    • 1
    • 9
    • 12
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryMaastricht University Medical CenterMaastrichtThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of SurgeryAcademic Medical CenterAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Department of SurgeryErasmus Medical CenterRotterdamThe Netherlands
  4. 4.Department of SurgeryUniversity Medical Center UtrechtUtrechtThe Netherlands
  5. 5.Department of SurgeryMaxima Medical CenterVeldhovenThe Netherlands
  6. 6.Department of SurgeryMedical Spectrum TwenteEnschedeThe Netherlands
  7. 7.Department of SurgeryRadboud University Nijmegen Medical CenterNijmegenThe Netherlands
  8. 8.Department of SurgeryJeroen Bosch HospitalDen BoschThe Netherlands
  9. 9.Department of SurgeryUniversity Hospital AachenAachenGermany
  10. 10.Department of SurgeryUniversity Hospital LeuvenLouvainBelgium
  11. 11.Department of SurgerySan Raffaele HospitalMilanItaly
  12. 12.Nutrim School for Nutrition, Toxicology and MetabolismMaastricht University Medical CenterMaastrichtThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations