World Journal of Surgery

, Volume 38, Issue 7, pp 1668–1675 | Cite as

Time to Breast Cancer Relapse Predicted By Primary Tumour Characteristics, Not Lymph Node Involvement

  • Danielle J. Fitzpatrick
  • Christine S. Lai
  • Robert F. Parkyn
  • David Walters
  • Vladimir Humeniuk
  • David C. A. Walsh
Best Paper at Breast Surgery International Congress, ISW, Helsinki, Finland, August 2013

Abstract

Introduction

The risk of breast cancer recurrence has been linked to tumour size, grade, oestrogen (ER) receptor status, and degree of lymph node (LN) involvement. However, the role of these variables in predicting time to relapse is not well defined. This study was designed to identify patient and primary tumour characteristics that predict risk periods for breast cancer recurrence within our institution, to enable more tailored surveillance strategies.

Methods

We retrospectively studied a cohort of 473 patients who presented to The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, Australia, with recurrent breast cancer between 1968 and 2008. Patient and primary tumour characteristics were collected, including age, menopausal status, tumour grade, size, ER and progesterone receptor (PR) status, and LN involvement and modeled against time to relapse using Kaplan–Meier survival curves.

Results

High tumour grade, size ≥20 mm, ER negativity, and PR negativity were shown on univariate analysis to correlate significantly with earlier recurrence (P < 0.0001, P = 0.0012, P = 0.0006, and P = 0.006). Multivariate analysis identified tumour grade and size as significant predictors of timing of relapse after adjustment for other variables. LN involvement, menopausal status, and age did not significantly correlate with earlier recurrence.

Conclusions

High tumour grade and larger size were shown to independently predict earlier breast cancer relapse. While LN involvement increases absolute recurrence risk, our study proposes that it does not influence timing of relapse. Use of these predictors will enable key risk periods for onset of relapse to be characterised according to tumour profile with more appropriate discharge to primary care providers for ongoing surveillance.

References

  1. 1.
    Brewster AM, Hortobagyi GN, Broglio KR et al (2008) Residual risk of breast cancer recurrence 5 years after adjuvant therapy. J Natl Cancer Inst 100(16):1179–1183PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Recht A, Gray R, Davidson NE et al (1999) Locoregional failure 10 years after mastectomy and adjuvant chemotherapy with or without tamoxifen without irradiation: experience of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol 17(6):1689–1700PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Voogd AC, Nielsen M, Peterse JL et al (2001) Differences in risk factors for local and distant recurrence after breast-conserving therapy or mastectomy for stage I and II breast cancer: pooled results of two large European randomized trials. J Clin Oncol 19(6):1688–1697PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wallgren A, Bonetti M, Gelber RD et al (2003) Risk factors for locoregional recurrence among breast cancer patients: results from International Breast Cancer Study Group Trials I through VII. J Clin Oncol 21(7):1205–1213PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    van der Leij F, Elkhuizen PH, Bartelink H et al (2012) Predictive factors for local recurrence in breast cancer. Semin Radiat Oncol 22(2):100–107PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Panoff JE, Hurley J, Takita C et al (2011) Risk of locoregional recurrence by receptor status in breast cancer patients receiving modern systemic therapy and post-mastectomy radiation. Breast Cancer Res Treat 128(3):899–906PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Neri A, Marrelli D, Rossi S et al (2007) Breast cancer local recurrence: risk factors and prognostic relevance of early time to recurrence. World J Surg 31(1):36–45. doi:10.1007/s00268-006-0097-2 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lowery AJ, Kell MR, Glynn RW et al (2012) Locoregional recurrence after breast cancer surgery: a systematic review by receptor phenotype. Breast Cancer Res Treat 133(3):831–841PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dent R, Trudeau M, Pritchard KI et al (2007) Triple-negative breast cancer: clinical features and patterns of recurrence. Clin Cancer Res 13(15 Pt 1):4429–4434PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Demicheli R, Abbattista A, Miceli R et al (1996) Time distribution of the recurrence risk for breast cancer patients undergoing mastectomy: further support about the concept of tumor dormancy. Breast Cancer Res Treat 41(2):177–185PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mansell J, Monypenny IJ, Skene AI et al (2009) Patterns and predictors of early recurrence in postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-positive early breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 117(1):91–98PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yin W, Di G, Zhou L et al (2009) Time-varying pattern of recurrence risk for Chinese breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat 114(3):527–535PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mauriac L, Keshaviah A, Debled M et al (2007) Predictors of early relapse in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer in the BIG 1-98 trial. Ann Oncol 18(5):859–867PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Song WJ, Kim KI, Park SH et al (2012) The risk factors influencing between the early and late recurrence in systemic recurrent breast cancer. J Breast Cancer 15(2):218–223PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hess KR, Pusztai L, Buzdar AU et al (2003) Estrogen receptors and distinct patterns of breast cancer relapse. Breast Cancer Res Treat 78(1):105–118PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pagani O, Price KN, Gelber RD et al (2009) Patterns of recurrence of early breast cancer according to estrogen receptor status: a therapeutic target for a quarter of a century. Breast Cancer Res Treat 117(2):319–324PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Demicheli R (2001) Tumour dormancy: findings and hypotheses from clinical research on breast cancer. Semin Cancer Biol 11(4):297–306PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Demicheli R, Bonadonna G, Hrushesky WJ et al (2004) Menopausal status dependence of the timing of breast cancer recurrence after surgical removal of the primary tumour. Breast Cancer Res 6(6):R689–R696PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Danielle J. Fitzpatrick
    • 1
    • 2
  • Christine S. Lai
    • 1
    • 2
  • Robert F. Parkyn
    • 1
    • 2
  • David Walters
    • 1
    • 2
  • Vladimir Humeniuk
    • 1
    • 2
  • David C. A. Walsh
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryThe Queen Elizabeth HospitalWoodvilleAustralia
  2. 2.Discipline of SurgeryThe University of AdelaideAdelaideAustralia

Personalised recommendations