World Journal of Surgery

, Volume 39, Issue 1, pp 47–53 | Cite as

Comparison of Two Models of Surgical Care for Patients with Cleft Lip and Palate in Resource-challenged Settings

  • Percy Rossell-Perry
  • Eddy Segura
  • Lorgio Salas-Bustinza
  • Omar Cotrina-Rabanal
Article

Abstract

Background

The Peruvian health system is limited in providing specialized care for patients with clefts because there are an insufficient number of hospitals and few specially trained doctors in rural areas of the country. The most common model of care in these areas is the surgical mission wherein experienced cleft surgeons perform surgeries and teach local doctors. The purpose of this research was to identify the differences in outcome between the surgical mission trip and the referral center model of care provided by the same team.

Methods

A retrospective analysis (2002–2012) was performed on data from surgical outcomes provided by the Outreach Surgical Center Lima that utilized both models of care (surgical mission and referral center). A total of 935 procedures were performed in 680 patients with clefts who were treated by the Outreach Surgical Center Program Lima since 2002. Patients in both groups were identified from our records (medical records and screening-day registries). All patients underwent a physical examination, had photographs taken, and any unfavorable results and complications were documented. Comparison of categorical variables (including outcomes) between care models was performed using Pearson’s χ 2 test or Fisher’s exact test when appropriate. In all cases a two-tailed test was performed and the p value for rejecting the null hypothesis (no difference or no association) was set at 0.05.

Results

We found significant differences between the two models of care with respect to unilateral cleft lip and cleft palate dehiscence (p = 0.02 and p = 0.04, respectively), palate postoperative hemorrhage (p < 0.01), and palatal fistula (p < 0.01) outcomes.

Discussion

Differences in observed surgical outcomes between the two models might be attributed to the surgeon’s performance and/or the patient’s age, and these factors are also considered with respect to the model of care. Limitations in long-term medical evaluation at each site should be identified and strategies to improve surgical outcomes must be developed to ensure that patients served by surgical missions obtain the same results achieved at a referral center.

Level of Evidence

Therapeutic III.

Keywords

Wound Dehiscence Mission Model Velopharyngeal Insufficiency Palatal Fistula Surgical Mission 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Disclosure

The authors have no financial interest to declare in relation to the content of this article.

References

  1. 1.
    Sacsaquispe Contreras S, Ortiz L (2004) Prevalencia de labio y/o paladar fisurado y factores de riesgo. Rev Estomatol Herediana 14(1–2):54–58Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rossell-Perry P (2009) Tratamiento de la fisura labiopalatina. Ed San Marcos, LimaGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zbar RI, Rai SM, Dingman DL (2000) Establishing cleft malformation surgery in developing nations: A model for the new millennium. Plast Reconstr Surg 106(4):886–889 (discussion 890–891)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Schneider W, Politis G, Gosain A, Migliori M et al (2011) Volunteers in plastic surgery guidelines for providing surgical care for children in the less developed world. Plast Reconstr Surg 127(6):2477–2486PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Shaw W (2004) Global strategies to reduce the health care burden of craniofacial anomalies: Report of WHO meetings on international collaborative research on craniofacial anomalies. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 41:238–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    World Health Organization (2002) Global strategies to reduce the burden of craniofacial anomalies: report of WHO meetings on international collaborative research on craniofacial anomalies. WHO, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    McQueen KA, Hyder JA, Taira BR, Semer N, Burkle FM Jr, Casey KM (2010) The provision of surgical care by international organizations in developing countries: a preliminary report. World J Surg 34:397–402. doi: 10.1007/s00268-009-0181-5 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ruiz-Razura A, Cronin ED, Navarro CE (2000) Creating long-term benefits in cleft lip and palate volunteer missions. Plast Reconstr Surg 105:195–201PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rossell-Perry P (2006) Nueva clasificación de severidad de fisuras labiopalatinas del programa Outreach Surgical Center Lima Perú. Acta Medica Peruana 23(2):59–66Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rossell-Perry P (2009) New diagram for cleft lip and palate description: the clock diagram. Cleft Palate Craniofac Surg J 46(3):305–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rossell-Perry P, Gavino-Gutierrez A (2011) Upper double-rotation advancement method for unilateral cleft lip repair of severe forms: classification and surgical technique. J Craniofac Surg 22(6):2036–2042PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rossell-Perry P, Gavino-Gutierrez A (2012) Asymmetric bilateral cleft lip: classification and a surgical technique. J Craniofac Surg 23(5):1367–1372PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rossell-Perry P (2009) Outreach Surgical Center Program Lima: A 15 years’ experience in Peru. In: 11th International Congress on Cleft Lip and Palate, Fortaleza, Brazil, September 2009Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    van Aalst JA, Wilson L, Donkor P, Rai SM, Rossell-Perry P, Al Sheikh H (2010) Volunteer international treatment programs from a host nation perspective. In: 67th Meeting of the American Cleft Palate Craniofacial Association, Fort Worth, TX, USA, March 2010Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rossell-Perry P, Palacios-Martinez J, Bermudez L (2009) Panel for the Volunteers in Plastic Surgery forum: “Providing High Quality and Safe Plastic Surgical Care in Developing Countries.” In: Annual Meeting of the American Society of Plastic Surgery, Seattle, WA, USA, October 2009Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Henkel KO, Gundlach K, Saka B (1998) Incidence of secondary lip surgeries as a function of cleft type and severity: one center’s experience. Cleft Palate Craniofac Surg 35:310–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hochstein H, Hochstein HJ (1986) Spaltträger in der Belletristik. Dtsch Z Mund Kiefer Gesichts Chir 10:405–409Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Horch HH (1990) Fortschritte und Schwerpunkte bei der komplexen Behandlung von Lippen-Kiefer-Gaumenspalten. Fortschr Kiefer Gesichtschir 35:36–43Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Salyer KE, Genecov ER, Genecov DG (2003) Unilateral cleft lip-nose repair: a 33 years experience. J Craniofac Surg 14(4):549–558PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Stal S, Hollier L (2002) Correction of secondary cleft lip deformities. Plast Reconstr Surg 109:1672–1681PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Koshy J, Ellsworth W, Sharabi S, Hatef D, Hollier L, Stal S (2010) Bilateral cleft lip revisions: the abbe flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 126(1):222–227Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Turner C, Zagirove A, Frolova L, Courtis F, Williams W (1998) Oral health status of Russian children with unilateral cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 35:489–494PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Instituto Nacional Estadística Perú. Indicadores nutricionales en Perú 2012. http://www.inei.gob.pe/biblioineipub/bancopub//Est/Lib0930/Libro.pdf. Accessed 9 Dec 2012
  24. 24.
    Cohen SR, Kalinowski J, LaRossa D, Randall P (1991) Cleft palate fistulas: a multivariate statistical analysis of prevalence, etiology, and surgical management. Plast Reconstr Surg 87:1041–1047PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bekerecioglu M, Isik D, Bulut O (2005) Comparison of the rate of palatal fistulation after two-flap and four-flap palatoplasty. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 39:287–289PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bindingnavele VK, Bresnick SD, Urata MM et al (2008) Superior results using the islandized hemipalatal flap in palatoplasty: experience with 500 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 122:232–239PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Muzaffar AR, Byrd HS, Rohrich RJ et al (2001) Incidence of cleft palate fistula: an institutional experience with two-stage palatal repair. Plast Reconstr Surg 108:1515–1518PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Abyholm FE, Borchgrevink HH, Eskeland G (1979) Palatal fistulae following cleft palate surgery. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 13:295–300PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Amaratunga NA (1988) Occurrence of oronasal fistulas in operated cleft palate patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 46:834–838PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Emory RE Jr, Clay RP, Bite U, Jackson IT (1997) Fistula formation and repair after palatal closure: an institutional perspective. Plast Reconstr Surg 99:1535–1538PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Maine RG, Hoffman WY, Palacios-Martinez JH, Corlew S, Gregory GA (2012) Comparison of fistula rates after palatoplasty for international and local surgeons on surgical missions in Ecuador with rates at a craniofacial center in the United States. Plast Reconstr Surg 129(2):319e–326ePubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Yuan N, Dorafshar AH, Follmar KE et al (2012) Effects of cleft width and veau type on rates of palatal fistula and velopharyngeal insufficiency after cleft palate repair. Plast Reconstr Surg 130(5 Suppl 1):23 (abstract)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Phua YS, de Chalain T (2008) Incidence of oronasal fistulae and velopharyngeal insufficiency after cleft palate repair: an audit of 211 children born between 1990 and 2004. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 45:172–178PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Landheer JA, Breugem CC, van der Molen AB (2010) Fistula incidence and predictors of fistula occurrence after cleft palate repair: two-stage closure versus one-stage closure. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 47:623–630PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Witt PD, Wahlen JC, Marsh JL et al (1998) The effect of surgeon experience on velopharygeal functional outcome following palatoplasty: is there a learning curve? Plast Reconstr Surg 102:1375–1384PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Machuca M, Meji DV, Prospen J, Granda E (2006) Situación de salud, Ecuador—2006. Organización Panamericana de la Salud en Ecuador, November 2006Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Shaw WC, Dahl E, Asher-McDade C et al (1992) A six-center international study of treatment outcome in patients with clefts of the lip and palate: part 5. General discussion and conclusions. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 29:413–418PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Mars M, Sell D, Habel A (eds) (2008) Management of Cleft Lip and Palate in the Developing World. Wiley, West SussexGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Bearn D, Mildinhall S, Murphy T, Murray JJ, Sell D, Shaw W, Williams A, Sandy JR (2001) Cleft lip and palate care in the United Kingdom—The Clinical Standards Advisory Group (CSAG) study. Part 4: outcome comparisons, training, and conclusions. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 38:38–43PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Webb AC, Watts R, Read-Ward E, Hodgkins J, Markus AF (2001) Audit of a multidisciplinary approach to the care of children with unilateral and bilateral cleft lip and palate. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 39:182–188PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Inman DS, Thomas P, Hodgkinson PD, Reid CA (2005) Oro-nasal fistula development and velopharyngeal insufficiency following primary cleft palate surgery—an audit of 148 children born between 1985 and 1997. Br J Plast Surg 58:1051–1054PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Rohrich RJ, Rowsell AR, Johns DF et al (1996) Timing of hard palatal closure: a critical long-term analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 98:236–246PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Hoppenreijs T (1990) Primary palatorraphy in the adult cleft palate patient: surgical, prosthetic and logopaedic aspects. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 18:141–146PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Marrinan EM, LaBrie RA, Mulliken JB (1998) Velopharyngeal function in nonsyndromic cleft palate: relevance of surgical technique, age at repair, and cleft type. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 35:95–100PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Zhao S, Xu Y, Yin H, Zheng Q, Wang Y, Zhong T et al (2012) Incidence of postoperative velopharyngeal insufficiency in late palate repair. J Craniofac Surg 23(6):1602–1606PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Yeow VK, Lee ST, Lambrecht TJ et al (2002) International Task Force on Volunteer Cleft Missions. J Craniofac Surg 13:18–25PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Percy Rossell-Perry
    • 1
  • Eddy Segura
    • 2
  • Lorgio Salas-Bustinza
    • 3
  • Omar Cotrina-Rabanal
    • 4
  1. 1.Faculty of Medicine San Martin de Porres UniversityLimaPeru
  2. 2.School of MedicineUniversidad Peruana de Ciencias AplicadasLimaPeru
  3. 3.Department of Pediatric SurgeryHospital Nuñez ButronPunoPeru
  4. 4.Department of DentalARMONIZAR FoundationLimaPeru

Personalised recommendations