World Journal of Surgery

, Volume 38, Issue 4, pp 882–889 | Cite as

Endoscopic Evaluation of Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication: 89 % Success Rate 10 Years After Surgery

  • Perttu Neuvonen
  • Mauri Iivonen
  • Tuomo RantanenEmail author



The surgical outcome of fundoplication can be evaluated by means of esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGDS). The literature reveals only one prior long-term follow-up series with endoscopic evaluation of the fundoplication wraps after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF). The results achieved at a university clinic showed LNF to be more durable than open fundoplication (ONF). Previously, in our community-based hospital, the results of ONF were somewhat poorer than those achieved at a university clinic. The objective of the present study was to describe the long-term results of LNF in our hospital as regards surgical and symptomatic outcomes.


In 1997–1999, 107 LNFs were performed in our hospital. A questionnaire with symptom evaluation was mailed to all patients. The patients who agreed to participate were interviewed and underwent EGDS.


Of the 107 patients, 64 (59.8 %) participated in the study (40 men, mean age 61.9 years, range 28–85 years). The mean follow-up time was 9.8 years. Seven endoscopic examinations (10.9 %) showed a defective fundic wrap; three of the patients had undergone reoperation. Fifty-eight (90.6 %) patients had no or minimal heartburn and 61 (95.3 %) had no or minimal regurgitation. Twenty-three (35.9 %) patients had moderate or severe dysphagia, and 43 (67.2 %) patients had moderate or severe flatulence. Fifty-seven (89.1 %) patients would have opted for surgery again.


This study contributes to the previous notion that LNF is associated with fewer surgical failures than ONF. Our results indicate that LNF can well be performed in a community-based hospital with acceptable long-term results.


Fibrin Glue Severe Dysphagia Postoperative Dysphagia Pyloric Dilatation Antisecretory Medication 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



The patients were interviewed by Sari Salomaa. The data analyses were done in collaboration with Jukka Ollgren and Rami Uurainen. This study was supported by the Häme Regional Fund of the Finnish Cultural Foundation and by the Competitive Research Funding of the Seinäjoki Central Hospital.


  1. 1.
    Galmiche JP, Hatlebakk J, Attwood S et al (2011) Laparoscopic antireflux surgery versus esomeprazole treatment for chronic GERD: the LOTUS randomized clinical trial. JAMA 305:1969–1977PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chang EY, Morris CD, Seltman AK et al (2007) The effect of antireflux surgery on esophageal carcinogenesis in patients with barrett esophagus: a systematic review. Ann Surg 246:11–21PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gatenby PA, Ramus JR, Caygill CP et al (2009) Treatment modalities and risk of development of dysplasia and adenocarcinoma in columnar-lined esophagus. Dis Esophagus 22:133–142PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lagergren J, Bergström R, Lindgren A et al (1999) Symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux as a risk factor for esophageal adenocarcinoma. N Engl J Med 340:825–831PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Broeders JA, Rijnhart-de Jong HG, Draaisma WA et al (2009) Ten-year outcome of laparoscopic and conventional Nissen fundoplication: randomized clinical trial. Ann Surg 250:698–706PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Morgenthal CB, Shane MD, Stival A (2007) The durability of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication: 11-year outcomes. J Gastrointest Surg 11:693–700PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Salminen P, Hurme S, Ovaska J (2012) Fifteen-year outcome of laparoscopic and open Nissen fundoplication: a randomized clinical trial. Ann Thorac Surg 93:228–233PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lord RV, Kaminski A, Öberg S et al (2002) Absence of gastroesophageal reflux disease in a majority of patients taking acid suppression medications after Nissen fundoplication. J Gastrointest Surg 6:3–10PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Luostarinen M (1993) Nissen fundoplication for reflux esophagitis. Long-term clinical and endoscopic results in 109 of 127 consecutive patients. Ann Surg 217:329–337PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rantanen TK, Halme TV, Luostarinen ME et al (1999) The long term results of open antireflux surgery in a community-based health care center. Am J Gastroenterol 94:1777–1781PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Salminen PT, Hiekkanen HI, Rantala AP et al (2007) Comparison of long-term outcome of laparoscopic and conventional nissen fundoplication: a prospective randomized study with an 11-year follow-up. Ann Surg 246:201–206PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rantanen T, Neuvonen P, Iivonen M et al (2011) The impact of fibrin glue in the prevention of failure after Nissen fundoplication. Scand J Surg 100:181–185PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Demeester TR, Johnson LF, Joseph GJ et al (1976) Patterns of gastroesophageal reflux in health and disease. Ann Surg 184:459–470PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Isolauri J, Viljakka M, Helin H et al (1997) Disruption of experimental fundic folds is prevented by interserosal scarring. Br J Surg 84:548–550PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fein M, Bueter M, Thalheimer A et al (2008) Ten-year outcome of laparoscopic antireflux surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 12:1893–1899PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dallemagne B, Weerts J, Markiewicz S et al (2006) Clinical results of laparoscopic fundoplication at ten years after surgery. Surg Endosc 20:159–165PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rantanen TK, Oksala NK, Oksala AK et al (2008) Complications in antireflux surgery: national-based analysis of laparoscopic and open fundoplications. Arch Surg 143:359–365PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    O’Boyle CJ, Watson DI, Jamieson GG et al (2002) Division of short gastric vessels at laparoscopic nissen fundoplication: a prospective double-blind randomized trial with 5-year follow-up. Ann Surg 235:165–170PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Chrysos E, Tzortzinis A, Tsiaoussis J et al (2001) Prospective randomized trial comparing Nissen to Nissen-Rossetti technique for laparoscopic fundoplication. Am J Surg 182:215–221PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Luostarinen ME, Isolauri JO (1999) Randomized trial to study the effect of fundic mobilization on long-term results of Nissen fundoplication. Br J Surg 86:614–618PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Watson DI, Pike GK, Baigrie RJ et al (1997) Prospective double-blind randomized trial of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication with division and without division of short gastric vessels. Ann Surg 226:642–652PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hunter JG, Smith CD, Branum GD et al (1999) Laparoscopic fundoplication failures: patterns of failure and response to fundoplication revision. Ann Surg 230:595–604PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bammer T, Hinder RA, Klaus A et al (2001) Five- to eight-year outcome of the first laparoscopic Nissen fundoplications. J Gastrointest Surg 5:42–48PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    O’Hanrahan Marples M, Bancewicz J (1990) Recurrent reflux and wrap disruption after Nissen fundoplication: detection, incidence and timing. Br J Surg 77:545–547PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Perttu Neuvonen
    • 1
  • Mauri Iivonen
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
  • Tuomo Rantanen
    • 1
    • 5
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of SurgerySeinäjoki Central HospitalSeinäjokiFinland
  2. 2.Department of SurgeryKanta-Häme Central HospitalHämeenlinnaFinland
  3. 3.Department of SurgeryForssa HospitalForssaFinland
  4. 4.Department of SurgeryLinnan Klinikka HospitalHämeenlinnaFinland
  5. 5.Department of SurgeryKuopio University HospitalKuopioFinland

Personalised recommendations