Advertisement

World Journal of Surgery

, Volume 38, Issue 2, pp 287–295 | Cite as

Understanding WHO Surgical Checklist Implementation: Tricks and Pitfalls. An Observational Study

  • Pedro J. SaturnoEmail author
  • Víctor Soria-Aledo
  • Zenewton A. Da Silva Gama
  • Felipe Lorca-Parra
  • Marina Grau-Polan
Article

Abstract

Background

The purpose of the present study was to assess the reliability of implementation data regarding the surgical safety checklist (SSC) and to identify which factors influence actual implementation.

Methods

The study was a retrospective record-based evaluation in a regional network of nine Spanish hospitals, combined with a complementary direct-observation study that included a survey of the surgical teams’ attitudes. SSC compliance and associated factors were assessed and compared in a retrospective sample of 280 operations and a concurrent sample of another 85 surgical interventions.

Results

In the retrospective evaluation the SSC was present in 83.1 % of cases, fully completed in 28.4 %, with 69.3 % of all possible items checked. The concurrent direct-observation study showed that recorded compliance was unreliable (κ < 0.13 for all items) and significantly higher (p < 0.001) than actual compliance. Over-registration occurred across hospitals and surgical specialties. Factors associated with recorded compliance included hospital size, surgical specialty, and the use of an electronic format. In actual (direct-observation) compliance, a positive attitude on the part of the surgeon is an overriding significant factor (OR 12.8), along with using the electronic format, which is consistently and positively associated with recorded compliance but negatively related to actual compliance.

Conclusions

Recorded SSC compliance may be widely unreliable and higher than actual compliance, particularly when recording is facilitated by using an electronic format. A positive attitude on the part of the surgical team, particularly surgeons, is associated with actual compliance. Effective use of the SSC is a far more complex adaptive process than the usual mandatory strategy.

Keywords

Electronic Format Composite Indicator Actual Compliance Hospital Size Concurrent Study 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Weiser TG, Regenbogen SE, Thompson KD et al (2008) An estimation of the global volume of surgery: a modeling strategy based on available data. Lancet 372:139–144PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    De Vries EN, Ramrattan MA, Smorenburg SM et al (2008) The incidence and nature of in-hospital adverse events: a systematic review. Qual Saf Health Care 17:216–223PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Haynes AB, Weiser TG, Berry WR et al (2009) A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population. N Engl J Med 360:491–499PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    De Vries EN, Hubert AP, Crolla R et al (2010) Effect of a comprehensive surgical safety system on patient outcomes. N Engl J Med 363:1928–1937PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lyons MK (2010) Eight-year experience with a neurosurgical checklist. Am J Med Qual 25:285–288PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lindgard L, Espin S, Rubin B et al (2005) Getting teams to talk: development and pilot implementation of a checklist to promote interprofessional communication in the OR. Qual Saf Health Care 14:340–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Messael FM, Al-Qahtani AS (2009) Benchmarking of World Health Organization surgical safety checklist. Saudi Med J 30:422–425Google Scholar
  8. 8.
  9. 9.
    World Health Organization (2009) Implementation manual WHO surgical safety checklist 2009. WHO, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Weiser TG, Haynes AB, Berry WR et al (2010) Effect of a 19-item surgical safety checklist during urgent operations in a global patient population. Ann Surg 251:976–980PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Surgical safety web map. http://maps.cga.harvard.edu:8080/Hospital/. Accessed May 2013
  12. 12.
    Vijayasekar C, Steele RJC (2009) The World Health Organization’s surgical safety checklist. Surgeon 7:260–262PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sewell M, Adebibe M, Jayakumar P et al (2011) Use of the WHO surgical safety checklist in trauma and orthopaedic patients. Int Orthop 35:897–901PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Van Klei WA, Hoff RG, Van Aarnhem E et al (2012) Effects of the introduction of the WHO “Surgical Safety Checklist” on in-hospital mortality: a cohort study. Ann Surg 255:44–49PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Vats A, Vincent CA, Nagpal K et al (2010) Practical challenges of introducing WHO surgical checklist: UK pilot experience. Br Med J 340:b5433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Conley DM, Singer SJ, Edmondson BA et al (2011) Effective surgical safety checklist implementation. J Am Coll Surg 212:873–879PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Majan RP (2011) The WHO surgical checklist. Best Prac Res Clin Anaesthesiol 25:161–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Taylor B, Slater A, Reznick R (2010) The surgical safety checklist effects are sustained, and team culture is strengthened (editorial). Surgeon 8:1–4PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ko HC, Turner TJ, Finnigan MA (2011) Systematic review of safety check list for use by medical care teams in acute hospital settings—limited evidence of effectiveness. BMC Health Services Res 11:211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Weiser TG, Haynes AB, Lashoher A et al (2010) Perspectives in quality: designing the WHO surgical safety checklist. Int J Qual Health Care 22:365–370PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Degani A (1993) Cockpit checklists: concepts, design and use. Hum Factors 35:28–43Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bosk CL, Dixon-Woods M, Goeschel CA et al (2009) Reality check for checklists. Lancet 374:444–445PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Berwick DM (2003) Disseminating innovations in health care. JAMA 289:1969–1975PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pedro J. Saturno
    • 1
    Email author
  • Víctor Soria-Aledo
    • 2
  • Zenewton A. Da Silva Gama
    • 1
  • Felipe Lorca-Parra
    • 1
  • Marina Grau-Polan
    • 1
  1. 1.Unidad docente de Medicina Preventiva y Salud Pública, Facultad de MedicinaUniversidad de MurciaMurciaSpain
  2. 2.Universidad de Hospital General Universitario Morales MeseguerMurciaSpain

Personalised recommendations