Advertisement

World Journal of Surgery

, Volume 38, Issue 6, pp 1498–1503 | Cite as

The ALPPS Procedure: A Surgical Option for Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Major Vascular Invasion

  • Giovanni Vennarecci
  • Andrea Laurenzi
  • Roberto Santoro
  • Marco Colasanti
  • Pasquale Lepiane
  • Giuseppe Maria Ettorre
Article

Abstract

Background

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) tends to have a particular invasiveness toward the portal vein (PV) branches and hepatic veins. This situation can hamper major surgical resection with a risk of postoperative liver failure due to the small future liver remnant (FLR) in cirrhotic livers. These patients are then usually directed to palliative treatments with poor results. The associating liver partition and PV ligation (PVL) in staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) strategy is one of the main surgical innovations in recent years in the field of liver surgical oncology. The ALPPS approach could allow surgical resection in patients with HCC and associated major vascular invasion.

Methods

Among 1,143 liver resection performed in our center, the ALPPS approach was employed in order to induce rapid hypertrophy of the left FLR in patients with HCC and associated major vascular invasion. This strategy consists of combining the in situ splitting of the liver along the main portal scissura or on the right side of the falciform ligament and PVL in a strategy of staged hepatectomy.

Results

In our experience the ALPPS approach allowed us to achieve a sufficient FLR in two cases of HCC with major vascular invasion, in which the classic two-stage strategy could not be applied. In both cases the patients could undergo major hepatectomies without mortality.

Conclusions

This novel strategy could expand the number of patients undergoing major liver resections that were previously considered non-resectable because of the risk of liver decompensation for an insufficient FLR.

Keywords

Hepatic Vein Future Liver Remnant Middle Hepatic Vein Falciform Ligament Body Weight Ratio 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that there are no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Cabibbo G, Enea M, Attanasio M et al (2010) A meta-analysis of survival rates of untreated patients in randomized clinical trials of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 51:1274–1283PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bruix J, Sherman M (2010) Management of hepatocellular carcinoma: an update. AASLD practice guideline. J Hepatology 35:421–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    European Association for the Study of the Liver, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (2012) EASL-EORTC clinical practice guidelines: management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol 56:908–943Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Agrawal S, Belghiti J (2011) Oncologic resections for malignant tumors of the liver. Ann Surg 253:656–665PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Andreou A, Vauthey JN, Cherqui D et al (2013) Improved long-term survival after major resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicenter analysis based on a new definition of major hepatectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 17:66–77PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Roayaie S, Jibara G, Taouli B, et al (2013) Resection of hepatocellular carcinoma with macroscopic invasion. Ann Surg Oncol 20:3754–3760Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zhang T, Huang JW, Bai YN, et al (2013) Recurrence and survival following hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma with major portal/hepatic vein tumor thrombus. Hepatol Res. doi:  10.1111/hepr.12185
  8. 8.
    Hemming AW, Reed AI, Howard RJ et al (2003) Preoperative portal vein embolization for extended hepatectomy. Ann Surg 237:686–693PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Liu H, Zhu S (2009) Present status and future perspectives of preoperative portal vein embolization. Am J Surg 197:686–690PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Farges O, Belghiti J, Kianmanesh R et al (2003) Portal vein embolization before right hepatectomy. Ann Surg 237:208–217PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schnitzbauer AA, Lang SA, Goessmann H et al (2012) Right portal vein ligation combined with in situ splitting induces rapid left lateral liver lobe hypertrophy enabling two-staged extended right hepatic resection in small for size settings. Ann Surg 255:405–414PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Alvarez FA, Ardiles V, Sanchez Claria R et al (2013) Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS): tips and tricks. J Gastrointest Surg 17:814–821PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Oken M, Creech R, Tormey D et al (1982) Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Am J Clin Oncol 5:649–655PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rahbari NN, Garden J, Padbury R et al (2011) Posthepatectomy liver failure: a definition and grading by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery (ISGLS). Surgery 149:713–724PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dokmak S, Ftériche FS, Borscheid R, et al (2013) 2012 liver resections in the 21st century: we are far from zero mortality. HPB (Oxford). doi:  10.1111/hpb.12069
  16. 16.
    Cescon M, Vetrone G, Grazi GL et al (2009) Trends in perioperative outcome after hepatic resection. Analysis of 1500 consecutive unselected cases over 20 years. Ann Surg 249:995–1002PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cavaness KM, Doyle MB, Lin Y et al (2013) Using ALPPS to induce rapid liver hypertrophy in a patient with hepatic fibrosis and portal vein thrombosis. J Gastrointest Surg 17:207–212PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Aloia TA, Vauthey JN (2012) Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS): what is gained and what is lost? Ann Surg 256:e9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Torres OJ, Fernandes Ede S, Oliveira CV et al (2013) Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS): the Brazilian experience. Arq Bras Cir Dig 26:40–43PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    De Santibañes E, Clavien PA (2012) Playing Play-Doh to prevent postoperative liver failure: the “ALPPS” approach. Ann Surg 255:415–417. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318248577d PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Andriani OC (2012) Long-term results with associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS). Ann Surg 256:e5PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Li J, Girotti P, Königsrainer I et al (2013) ALPPS in right trisectionectomy: a safe procedure to avoid postoperative liver failure? J Gastrointest Surg 17:956–961PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    De Santibanes E, Alvarez FA, Ardiles V (2012) How to avoid postoperative liver failure: a novel method. World J Surg 36:125–128. doi: 10.1007/s00268-011-1331-0 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Belghiti J, Guevara OA, Noun R et al (2001) Liver hanging maneuver: a safe approach to right hepatectomy without liver mobilization. J Am Coll Surg 193:109–111PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Giovanni Vennarecci
    • 1
  • Andrea Laurenzi
    • 1
  • Roberto Santoro
    • 1
  • Marco Colasanti
    • 1
  • Pasquale Lepiane
    • 1
  • Giuseppe Maria Ettorre
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of General Surgery and Liver TransplantationS. Camillo HospitalRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations