World Journal of Surgery

, Volume 37, Issue 12, pp 2740–2746 | Cite as

State of the Art of Robotic Thymectomy

  • Mahmoud Ismail
  • Marc Swierzy
  • Jens C. RückertEmail author



Thymectomy is a widely accepted treatment for most cases of myasthenia gravis and essential for the treatment of thymoma. The development of a minimally invasive procedure for thymectomy resulted in a variety of approaches for surgery on the thymic gland. The use of thoracoscopy-based techniques has continued to increase, including the latest advance in this field, robotic thymectomy.


We review the rapid development and actual use of this approach by examining published reports, worldwide registries, and personal communications and by analyzing our database, which is the largest single-center experience and contains 317 thymectomies until 12/2012. The technical modifications of robotic thymectomy are also described.


Since 2001, approximately 3,500 robotic thymectomies have been registered worldwide. Meanwhile, the results of approximately 500 thymectomy cases have been published. Robotic thymectomy is performed most frequently through a standardized unilateral three-trocar approach. All reports describe promising and satisfactory results for myasthenia gravis. For early-stage thymoma, robotic thymectomy is a technically sound and safe procedure with a very low complication rate and short hospital stay. Oncological outcome without recurrences is promising, but a longer follow-up is needed.


The unilateral robotic technique can be considered an adequate approach for thymectomy, even with demanding anatomical configurations. Robotic thymectomy has spread worldwide over the last decade because of the promising results in myasthenia gravis and thymoma patients.


Thymoma Phrenic Nerve Complete Remission Rate Robotic Approach Innominate Vein 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Marulli G, Rea F, Melfi F et al (2012) Robot-aided thoracoscopic thymectomy for early-stage thymoma: a multicenter European study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 144:1125–1130PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jurado J, Javidfar J, Newmark A et al (2012) Minimally invasive thymectomy and open thymectomy: outcome analysis of 263 patients. Ann Thorac Surg 94:974–981, discussion 981–972PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Shrager JB (2010) Extended transcervical thymectomy: the ultimate minimally invasive approach. Ann Thorac Surg 89:S2128–S2134PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Prokakis C, Koletsis E, Salakou S et al (2009) Modified maximal thymectomy for myasthenia gravis: effect of maximal resection on late neurologic outcome and predictors of disease remission. Ann Thorac Surg 88:1638–1645PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Masaoka A, Nagaoka Y, Kotake Y (1975) Distribution of thymic tissue at the anterior mediastinum. Current procedures in thymectomy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 70:747–754PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jaretzki A 3rd, Penn AS, Younger DS et al (1988) “Maximal” thymectomy for myasthenia gravis. Results. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 95:747–757PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bulkley GB, Bass KN, Stephenson GR et al (1997) Extended cervicomediastinal thymectomy in the integrated management of myasthenia gravis. Ann Surg 226:324–334, discussion 334–325PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mulder DG (1996) Extended transsternal thymectomy. Chest Surg Clin N Am 6:95–105PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rückert J (2003) Die Entwicklung der thorakoskopischenThymektomie—klinische und experimentelle Untersuchung. Accessed 22 May 2013
  10. 10.
    Iribarne A, Easterwood R, Russo MJ et al (2011) A minimally invasive approach is more cost-effective than a traditional sternotomy approach for mitral valve surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 142:1507–1514PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Braumann C, Jacobi CA, Menenakos C et al (2008) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic and thoracoscopic surgery with the da Vinci system: a 4-year experience in a single institution. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 18:260–266PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bodner J, Augustin F, Wykypiel H et al (2005) The da Vinci robotic system for general surgical applications: a critical interim appraisal. Swiss Med Wkly 135:674–678PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yoshino I, Hashizume M, Shimada M et al (2001) Thoracoscopic thymomectomy with the da Vinci computer-enhanced surgical system. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 122:783–785PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rückert JC, Swierzy M, Ismail M (2011) Comparison of robotic and nonrobotic thoracoscopic thymectomy: a cohort study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 141:673–677PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ashton RC Jr, McGinnis KM, Connery CP et al (2003) Totally endoscopic robotic thymectomy for myasthenia gravis. Ann Thorac Surg 75:569–571PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bodner J, Wykypiel H, Wetscher G et al (2004) First experiences with the da Vinci operating robot in thoracic surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 25:844–851PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Schneiter D, Tomaszek S, Kestenholz P et al (2013) Minimally invasive resection of thymomas with the da Vinci(R) surgical system. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 43:288–292PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rückert JC, Ismail M, Swierzy M et al (2008) Thoracoscopic thymectomy with the da Vinci robotic system for myasthenia gravis. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1132:329–335PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Marulli G, Schiavon M, Perissinotto E et al (2013) Surgical and neurologic outcomes after robotic thymectomy in 100 consecutive patients with myasthenia gravis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 145:730–735, discussion 735–736PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Freeman RK, Ascioti AJ, Van Woerkom JM et al (2011) Long-term follow-up after robotic thymectomy for nonthymomatous myasthenia gravis. Ann Thorac Surg 92:1018–1022, discussion 1022–1013PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Melfi F, Fanucchi O, Davini F et al (2012) Ten-year experience of mediastinal robotic surgery in a single referral centre. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 41:847–851PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Augustin F, Schmid T, Sieb M et al (2008) Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery thymectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 85:S768–S771PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Cerfolio RJ, Bryant AS, Minnich DJ (2011) Starting a robotic program in general thoracic surgery: why, how, and lessons learned. Ann Thorac Surg 91:1729–1736, discussion 1736–1727PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Castle SL, Kernstine KH (2008) Robotic-assisted thymectomy. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 20:326–331PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Goldstein SD, Yang SC (2010) Assessment of robotic thymectomy using the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America Guidelines. Ann Thorac Surg 89:1080–1085, discussion 1085–1086PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tomulescu V, Stanciulea O, Balescu I et al (2009) First year experience of robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery with 153 cases in a general surgery department: indications, technique and results. Chirurgia (Bucur) 104:141–150Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Schumacher ER (1912) Thymektomie bei einem Fall von Morbus Basedowi mit Myasthenie Grenzgeb. Med Chir 25:746–765Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Keynes G (1954) Surgery of the thymus gland; second (and third) thoughts. Lancet 266:1197–1202PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Gross M (1993) Innovations in surgery. A proposal for phased clinical trials. J Bone Joint Surg Br 75:351–354PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Rückert JC, Czyzewski D, Pest S et al (2000) Radicality of thoracoscopic thymectomy—an anatomical study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 18:735–736PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Rückert JC, Ismail M, Swierzy M et al (2008) Minimally invasive thymus surgery. Chirurg 79(18):20–25Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Jaretzki A, Steinglass KM, Sonett JR (2004) Thymectomy in the management of myasthenia gravis. Semin Neurol 24:49–62PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Rea F, Marulli G, Bortolotti L et al (2006) Experience with the “da Vinci” robotic system for thymectomy in patients with myasthenia gravis: report of 33 cases. Ann Thorac Surg 81:455–459PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Murthy SC (2013) Niche for a technology or technology for a niche? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 145:737PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Baek SJ, Kim SH, Cho JS et al (2012) Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: a cost analysis from a single institute in Korea. World J Surg 36:2722–2729. doi: 10.1007/s00268-012-1728-4 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Barbash GI, Glied SA (2010) New technology and health care costs—the case of robot-assisted surgery. N Engl J Med 363:701–704PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Yim AP (1997) Thoracoscopic thymectomy: which side to approach? Ann Thorac Surg 64:584–585PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Mack MJ (2001) Video-assisted thoracoscopy thymectomy for myasthenia gravis. Chest Surg Clin N Am 11:389–405, discussion xi–xiiPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Mineo TC, Pompeo E, Lerut TE et al (2000) Thoracoscopic thymectomy in autoimmune myasthesia: results of left-sided approach. Ann Thorac Surg 69:1537–1541PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Tripathi M, Srivastava K, Misra SK et al (2001) Peri-operative management of patients for video-assisted thoracoscopic thymectomy in myasthenia gravis. J Postgrad Med 47:258–261PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Detterbeck FC (2013) The international thymic malignancy interest group. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 11:589–593PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mahmoud Ismail
    • 1
  • Marc Swierzy
    • 1
  • Jens C. Rückert
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of General, Visceral, Vascular and Thoracic SurgeryUniversitätsmedizin Berlin - Charitè Campus MitteBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations