Advertisement

World Journal of Surgery

, Volume 38, Issue 1, pp 252–263 | Cite as

Cost-effectiveness of Surgery in Low- and Middle-income Countries: A Systematic Review

  • Caris E. Grimes
  • Jaymie Ang Henry
  • Jane Maraka
  • Nyengo C. Mkandawire
  • Michael Cotton
Article

Abstract

Background

There is increasing interest in provision of essential surgical care as part of public health policy in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). Relatively simple interventions have been shown to prevent death and disability. We reviewed the published literature to examine the cost-effectiveness of simple surgical interventions which could be made available at any district hospital, and compared these to standard public health interventions.

Methods

PubMed and EMBASE were searched using single and combinations of the search terms “disability adjusted life year” (DALY), “quality adjusted life year,” “cost-effectiveness,” and “surgery.” Articles were included if they detailed the cost-effectiveness of a surgical intervention of relevance to a LMIC, which could be made available at any district hospital. Suitable articles with both cost and effectiveness data were identified and, where possible, data were extrapolated to enable comparison across studies.

Results

Twenty-seven articles met our inclusion criteria, representing 64 LMIC over 16 years of study. Interventions that were found to be cost-effective included cataract surgery (cost/DALY averted range US$5.06–$106.00), elective inguinal hernia repair (cost/DALY averted range US$12.88–$78.18), male circumcision (cost/DALY averted range US$7.38–$319.29), emergency cesarean section (cost/DALY averted range US$18–$3,462.00), and cleft lip and palate repair (cost/DALY averted range US$15.44–$96.04). A small district hospital with basic surgical services was also found to be highly cost-effective (cost/DALY averted 1 US$0.93), as were larger hospitals offering emergency and trauma surgery (cost/DALY averted US$32.78–$223.00). This compares favorably with other standard public health interventions, such as oral rehydration therapy (US$1,062.00), vitamin A supplementation (US$6.00–$12.00), breast feeding promotion (US$930.00), and highly active anti-retroviral therapy for HIV (US$922.00).

Conclusions

Simple surgical interventions that are life-saving and disability-preventing should be considered as part of public health policy in LMIC. We recommend an investment in surgical care and its integration with other public health measures at the district hospital level, rather than investment in single disease strategies.

Keywords

Cataract Surgery Clubfoot Surgical Care Male Circumcision Trachoma 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Conflict of interest

None.

References

  1. 1.
    Farmer PE, Kim JY (2008) Surgery and global health: a view from beyond the OR. World J Surg 32:533–536. doi: 10.1007/s00268-008-9525-9 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Debas HT, Gosselin R, McCord C et al (2006) Surgery. In: Jamison DT, Breman JG, Measham AR, Alleyne G, Claeson M, Evans DB et al (eds) Disease control priorities in developing countries, vol 2. The World Bank/Oxfprd University Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    McQueen KA, Ozgediz D, Riviello R et al (2010) Essential surgery: integral to the right to health. Health Hum Rights 12:137–152PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Murray CJ, Vos T, Lozano R et al (2013) Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 291 diseases and injuries in 21 regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet 380(9859):2197–2223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Shillcutt SD, Clarke MG, Kingsnorth AN (2010) Cost-effectiveness of groin hernia surgery in the western region of Ghana. Arch Surg 145:954–961PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Weiser TG, Regenbogen SE, Thompson KD et al (2008) An estimation of the global volume of surgery: a modelling strategy based on available data. Lancet 372(9633):139–144PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Outcome of Copenhagen Consensus (2008). http://www.copenhagenconsensus.com/Home.aspx. Accessed 3 Feb 2013
  8. 8.
    Baltussen R, Smith A (2012) Cost effectiveness of strategies to combat vision and hearing loss in sub-Saharan Africa and South East Asia: mathematical modelling study. BMJ 344:e615PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gyllensvard H (2010) Cost-effectiveness of injury prevention—a systematic review of municipality based interventions. Cost Eff Resour Alloc 8:17PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lavis JN (2009) How can we support the use of systematic reviews in policymaking? PLoS Med 6(11):e1000141PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mock C, Cherian M, Juillard C et al (2010) Developing priorities for addressing surgical conditions globally: furthering the link between surgery and public health policy. World J Surg 34:381–385. doi: 10.1007/s00268-009-0263-4 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    CHOosing Interventions that are Cost Effective (WHO-CHOICE) (2005) Purchasing power parity. http://www.who.int/choice/costs/ppp/en/. Accessed 31 June 2013
  13. 13.
    Alkire BC, Vincent JR, Burns CT et al (2012) Obstructed labor and caesarean delivery: the cost and benefit of surgical intervention. PLoS One 7(4):e34595PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bollinger LA, Stover J, Musuka G et al (2009) The cost and impact of male circumcision on HIV/AIDS in Botswana. J Int AIDS Soc 12:7PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Uthman OA, Popoola TA, Yahaya I et al (2011) The cost-utility analysis of adult male circumcision for prevention of heterosexual acquisition of HIV in men in sub-Saharan Africa: a probabilistic decision model. Value Health 14:70–79PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    CHOosing Interventions that are Cost Effective (WHO-CHOICE). http://www.who.int/choice/. Accessed 31 June 2013
  17. 17.
    Adam T, Lim SS, Mehta S et al (2005) Cost effectiveness analysis of strategies for maternal and neonatal health in developing countries. BMJ 331(7525):1107PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jha P, Bangoura O, Ranson K (1998) The cost-effectiveness of forty health interventions in Guinea. Health Policy Plan 13:249–262PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Baltussen R, Sylla M, Mariotti SP (2004) Cost-effectiveness analysis of cataract surgery: a global and regional analysis. Bull World Health Organ 82:338–345PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Singh AJ, Garner P, Floyd K (2000) Cost-effectiveness of public-funded options for cataract surgery in Mysore, India. Lancet 355(9199):180–184PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Marseille E (1996) Cost-effectiveness of cataract surgery in a public health eye care programme in Nepal. Bull World Health Organ 74:319–324PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Njeuhmeli E, Forsythe S, Reed J et al (2011) Voluntary medical male circumcision: modeling the impact and cost of expanding male circumcision for HIV prevention in eastern and southern Africa. PLoS Med 8(11):e1001132PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Binagwaho A, Pegurri E, Muita J et al (2010) Male circumcision at different ages in Rwanda: a cost-effectiveness study. PLoS Med 7(1):e1000211PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Auvert B, Marseille E, Korenromp EL et al (2008) Estimating the resources needed and savings anticipated from roll-out of adult male circumcision in Sub-Saharan Africa. PLoS One 3(8):e2679PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Fieno JV (2008) Costing adult male circumcision in high HIV prevalence, low circumcision rate countries. AIDS Care 20:515–520PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gray RH, Li X, Kigozi G et al (2007) The impact of male circumcision on HIV incidence and cost per infection prevented: a stochastic simulation model from Rakai, Uganda. AIDS 21:845–850PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kahn JG, Marseille E, Auvert B (2006) Cost-effectiveness of male circumcision for HIV prevention in a South African setting. PLoS Med 3(12):e517PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Gosselin RA, Maldonado A, Elder G (2010) Comparative cost-effectiveness analysis of two MSF surgical trauma centers. World J Surg 34:415–419. doi: 10.1007/s00268-009-0230-0 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Gosselin RA, Heitto M (2008) Cost-effectiveness of a district trauma hospital in Battambang, Cambodia. World J Surg 32:2450–2453. doi: 10.1007/s00268-008-9708-4 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Gosselin RA, Thind A, Bellardinelli A (2006) Cost/DALY averted in a small hospital in Sierra Leone: what is the relative contribution of different services? World J Surg 30:505–511. doi: 10.1007/s00268-005-0609-5 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    McCord C, Chowdhury Q (2003) A cost effective small hospital in Bangladesh: what it can mean for emergency obstetric care. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 81:83–92PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Alkire B, Hughes CD, Nash K et al (2011) Potential economic benefit of cleft lip and palate repair in sub-Saharan Africa. World J Surg 35:1194–1201. doi: 10.1007/s00268-011-1055-1 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Corlew DS (2010) Estimation of impact of surgical disease through economic modeling of cleft lip and palate care. World J Surg 34:391–396. doi: 10.1007/s00268-009-0198-9 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Magee WP Jr, Vander Burg R, Hatcher KW (2010) Cleft lip and palate as a cost-effective health care treatment in the developing world. World J Surg 34:420–427. doi: 10.1007/s00268-009-0333-7 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Shillcutt SD, Sanders DL, Teresa Butron-Vila M et al (2013) Cost-effectiveness of inguinal hernia surgery in northwestern Ecuador. World J Surg 37:32–41. doi: 10.1007/s00268-012-1808-5 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Chen AT, Pedtke A, Kobs JK et al (2012) Volunteer orthopedic surgical trips in Nicaragua: a cost-effectiveness evaluation. World J Surg 36:2802–2808. doi: 10.1007/s00268-012-1702-1 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Gosselin RA, Gialamas G, Atkin DM (2011) Comparing the cost-effectiveness of short orthopedic missions in elective and relief situations in developing countries. World J Surg 35:951–955. doi: 10.1007/s00268-010-0947-9 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Laxminarayan R, Chow J, Shahid-Salles SA (2006) Intervention cost-effectiveness: overview of main messages. In: Jamison DT, Breman JG, Measham AR, Alleyne G, Claeson M, Evans DB et al (eds) Disease Control Priorities in Developing Countries, vol 2. World Bank/Oxford University Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Balabanova D, McKee M, Mills A et al (2010) What can global health institutions do to help strengthen health systems in low income countries? Health Res Policy Syst 8:22PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Barnighausen T, Bloom DE, Humair S (2011) Going horizontal—shifts in funding of global health interventions. N Engl J Med 364:2173–2181Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Edejer T, Baltussen R, Adam T et al (2003) WHO guide to cost-effectiveness analysis. World Health Organisation, GenevaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Caris E. Grimes
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jaymie Ang Henry
    • 3
    • 4
  • Jane Maraka
    • 5
  • Nyengo C. Mkandawire
    • 6
  • Michael Cotton
    • 7
  1. 1.Kings Centre for Global Health, Kings CollegeLondonUK
  2. 2.Department of General SurgeryEast Surrey HospitalRedhillUK
  3. 3.University of California Berkeley School of Public HealthBerkeleyUSA
  4. 4.Institute for Global Orthopaedics and Traumatology (IGOT)San FranciscoUSA
  5. 5.East of England DeaneryEssexUK
  6. 6.College of MedicineUniversity of MalawiBlantyreMalawi
  7. 7.A&E DepartmentUniversity Hospital of Canton VaudLausanneSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations