Biologic Versus Nonbiologic Mesh in Ventral Hernia Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
- 1.5k Downloads
The current standard of treatment for most ventral hernias is a mesh-based repair. Little is known about the safety and efficacy of biologic versus nonbiologic grafts. A meta-analysis was performed to examine two primary outcomes: recurrence and wound complication rates.
Electronic databases and reference lists of relevant articles were systematically searched for all clinical trials and cohort studies published between January 1990 and January 2012. A total of eight retrospective studies, with 1,229 patients, were included in the final analysis.
Biologic grafts had significantly fewer infectious wound complications (p < 0.00001). However, the recurrence rates of biologic and nonbiologic mesh were not different. In subgroup analysis, there was no difference in recurrence rates and wound complications between human-derived and porcine-derived biologic grafts.
Use of biologic mesh for ventral hernia repair results in less infectious wound complications but similar recurrence rates compared to nonbiologic mesh. This supports the application of biologic mesh for ventral hernia repair in high-risk patients or patients with a previous history of wound infection only when the significant additional cost of these materials can be justified and synthetic mesh is considered inappropriate.
KeywordsHernia Repair Incisional Hernia Ventral Hernia Wound Complication Ventral Hernia Repair
Component separation technique
Human acellular dermal matrix
Human biologic mesh
Porcine biologic mesh
Conflict of interest
- 5.den Hartog D, Dur AH, Tuinebreijer WE et al (2008) Open surgical procedures for incisional hernias. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 16(3):CD006438Google Scholar
- 6.Bendavid R, Abrahamson J, Arregui ME et al (eds) (2001) Abdominal wall hernia: principles and management. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar