Advertisement

World Journal of Surgery

, Volume 37, Issue 9, pp 2234–2241 | Cite as

Postoperative Complications Influence Prognosis and Recurrence Patterns in Periampullary Cancer

  • Jai Young Cho
  • Ho-Seong HanEmail author
  • Yoo-Seok Yoon
  • Dae Wook Hwang
  • Kyuwhan Jung
  • Young Ki Kim
Article

Abstract

Background

The present study was performed to elucidate the influence of postoperative complications on the prognosis and recurrence patterns of periampullary cancer after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD).

Methods

Clinical data were reviewed from 200 consecutive patients who had periampullary cancer and underwent PD between October 2003 and July 2010, and survival outcomes and recurrence patterns were analyzed. Postoperative complications were classified according to a modification of Clavien’s classification.

Results

Overall, 86 major complications of grade II or higher occurred in 71 patients. The patients were classified into two groups according to the presence of postoperative complications of grade II or higher: group Cx−, absence of complications (n = 129); and group Cx+, presence of complications (n = 71). There were no differences in gender, mean age, tumor node metastasis stage, biliary drainage, type of resection, and radicality between the two groups (P > 0.05). The 3-year overall and disease-free survival rates of the group Cx+ patients (31.0 and 22.3 %, respectively) were significantly lower than those of the group Cx− patients (49.0 and 40.0 %; P = 0.003 and 0.002, respectively). The multivariate analysis showed that postoperative complications (P = 0.001; RR = 1.887; 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.278–2.785), a T stage of T3 or T4 (P = 0.001; RR = 2.503; 95 % CI 1.441–4.346), positive node metastasis (P = 0.001; RR = 2.093; 95 % CI, 1.378–3.179), R1 or R2 resection (P = 0.023; RR = 1.863; 95 % CI 1.090–3.187), and angiolymphatic invasion (P = 0.013; RR = 1.676; 95 % CI 1.117–2.513) were independent prognostic factors for disease-free survival. Regarding recurrence patterns, group Cx+ patients exhibited more distant recurrences than did group Cx− patients (P = 0.025).

Conclusions

Postoperative complications affect prognosis and recurrence patterns in patients with periampullary cancer after PD.

Keywords

Postoperative Complication Recurrence Pattern Bile Duct Cancer Preoperative Biliary Drainage Distal Common Bile Duct 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Conflict of interest

None.

References

  1. 1.
    Hatzaras I, George N, Muscarella P et al (2010) Predictors of survival in periampullary cancers following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 17:991–997PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Balcom JHT, Rattner DW, Warshaw AL et al (2001) Ten-year experience with 733 pancreatic resections: changing indications, older patients, and decreasing length of hospitalization. Arch Surg 136:391–398PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Maher MM et al (1995) A prospective randomized trial of pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg 222:580–588 discussion 588–592PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Buchler MW, Friess H, Wagner M et al (2000) Pancreatic fistula after pancreatic head resection. Br J Surg 87:883–889PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sato N, Yamaguchi K, Chijiiwa K et al (1998) Risk analysis of pancreatic fistula after pancreatic head resection. Arch Surg 133:1094–1098PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Khuri SF, Henderson WG, DePalma RG et al (2005) Determinants of long-term survival after major surgery and the adverse effect of postoperative complications. Ann Surg 242:326–341 discussion 341–343PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Law WL, Choi HK, Lee YM, Ho JW (2007) The impact of postoperative complications on long-term outcomes following curative resection for colorectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 14:2559–2566PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Crozier JE, McKee RF, McArdle CS et al (2007) Preoperative but not postoperative systemic inflammatory response correlates with survival in colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 94:1028–1032PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jamieson GG, Thompson SK (2009) Detection of lymph node metastases in oesophageal cancer. Br J Surg 96:21–25PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Murri AM, Hilmy M, Bell J et al (2008) The relationship between the systemic inflammatory response, tumour proliferative activity, T-lymphocytic and macrophage infiltration, microvessel density and survival in patients with primary operable breast cancer. Br J Cancer 99:1013–1019PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Han HS, Cho JY, Yoon YS et al (2011) Preoperative inflammation is a prognostic factor for gallbladder carcinoma. Br J Surg 98:111–116PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cho JY, Han HS, Yoon YS et al (2012) Preoperative cholangitis and metastatic lymph node have negative impact on survival after resection of extrahepatic bile duct cancer. World J Surg 36:1842–1847. doi: 10.1007/s00268-012-1594-0 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Clavien PA, Camargo CA Jr, Croxford R et al (1994) Definition and classification of negative outcomes in solid organ transplantation. Application in liver transplantation. Ann Surg 220:109–120PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cho JY, Suh KS, Kwon CH et al (2006) Outcome of donors with a remnant liver volume of less than 35 % after right hepatectomy. Liver Transpl 12:201–206PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cho JY, Suh KS, Kwon CH et al (2006) Mild hepatic steatosis is not a major risk factor for hepatectomy and regenerative power is not impaired. Surgery 139:508–515PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yi NJ, Suh KS, Cho JY et al (2007) Three-quarters of right liver donors experienced postoperative complications. Liver Transpl 13:797–806PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Katz MH, Wang H, Balachandran A et al (2011) Effect of neoadjuvant chemoradiation and surgical technique on recurrence of localized pancreatic cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 16:68–79PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hur S, Yoon CJ, Kang SG et al (2011) Transcatheter arterial embolization of gastroduodenal artery stump pseudoaneurysms after pancreaticoduodenectomy: safety and efficacy of two embolization techniques. J Vasc Interv Radiol 22:294–301PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wagner M, Redaelli C, Lietz M et al (2004) Curative resection is the single most important factor determining outcome in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Br J Surg 91:494–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Schafer M, Mullhaupt B, Clavien PA (2002) Evidence-based pancreatic head resection for pancreatic cancer and chronic pancreatitis. Ann Surg 236:137–148PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nitecki SS, Sarr MG, Colby TV et al (1995) Long-term survival after resection for ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Is it really improving? Ann Surg 221:59–66PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Han SS, Jang JY, Kim SW et al (2006) Analysis of long-term survivors after surgical resection for pancreatic cancer. Pancreas 32:271–275PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Yeo CJ, Sohn TA, Cameron JL et al (1998) Periampullary adenocarcinoma: analysis of 5-year survivors. Ann Surg 227:821–831PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Sohn TA et al (1999) Pancreaticoduodenectomy with or without extended retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy for periampullary adenocarcinoma: comparison of morbidity and mortality and short-term outcome. Ann Surg 229:613–622 discussion 622–624PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Riall TS, Cameron JL, Lillemoe KD et al (2006) Resected periampullary adenocarcinoma: 5-year survivors and their 6- to 10-year follow-up. Surgery 140:764–772PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Nakao A, Harada A, Nonami T et al (1995) Lymph node metastases in carcinoma of the head of the pancreas region. Br J Surg 82:399–402PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Chan C, Herrera MF, de la Garza L et al (1995) Clinical behavior and prognostic factors of periampullary adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg 222:632–637PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Howard TJ, Krug JE, Yu J et al (2006) A margin-negative R0 resection accomplished with minimal postoperative complications is the surgeon’s contribution to long-term survival in pancreatic cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 10:1338–1345 discussion 1345–1346PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kang CM, Kim DH, Choi GH et al (2009) Detrimental effect of postoperative complications on oncologic efficacy of R0 pancreatectomy in ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. J Gastrointest Surg 13:907–914PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G et al (2005) Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 138:8–13PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Murthy BL, Thomson CS, Dodwell D et al (2007) Postoperative wound complications and systemic recurrence in breast cancer. Br J Cancer 97:1211–1217PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kressner U, Graf W, Mahteme H et al (2002) Septic complications and prognosis after surgery for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 45:316–321PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Balkwill F, Mantovani A (2001) Inflammation and cancer: back to Virchow? Lancet 357:539–545PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Abramovitch R, Marikovsky M, Meir G et al (1999) Stimulation of tumour growth by wound-derived growth factors. Br J Cancer 79:1392–1398PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Menetrier-Caux C, Montmain G, Dieu MC et al (1998) Inhibition of the differentiation of dendritic cells from CD34(+) progenitors by tumor cells: role of interleukin-6 and macrophage colony-stimulating factor. Blood 92:4778–4791PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Bogden AE, Moreau JP, Eden PA (1997) Proliferative response of human and animal tumours to surgical wounding of normal tissues: onset, duration and inhibition. Br J Cancer 75:1021–1027PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Raa ST, Oosterling SJ, van der Kaaij NP et al (2005) Surgery promotes implantation of disseminated tumor cells, but does not increase growth of tumor cell clusters. J Surg Oncol 92:124–129PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Jacobi CA, Ordemann J, Zieren HU et al (1998) Increased systemic inflammation after laparotomy vs laparoscopy in an animal model of peritonitis. Arch Surg 133:258–262PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    van den Tol PM, van Rossen EE, van Eijck CH et al (1998) Reduction of peritoneal trauma by using nonsurgical gauze leads to less implantation metastasis of spilled tumor cells. Ann Surg 227:242–248PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    van den Tol MP, ten Raa S, van Grevenstein WM et al (2007) The post-surgical inflammatory response provokes enhanced tumour recurrence: a crucial role for neutrophils. Dig Surg 24:388–394PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jai Young Cho
    • 1
  • Ho-Seong Han
    • 1
    Email author
  • Yoo-Seok Yoon
    • 1
  • Dae Wook Hwang
    • 1
  • Kyuwhan Jung
    • 1
  • Young Ki Kim
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SurgerySeoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of MedicineSeongnam-siRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations