World Journal of Surgery

, Volume 37, Issue 8, pp 1988–1995 | Cite as

Occurrence and Significance of Odontoid Lateral Mass Interspace Asymmetry in Trauma Patients

  • Franck BillmannEmail author
  • Therezia Bokor-Billmann
  • Claude Burnett
  • Erhard Kiffner



The odontoid lateral mass interspace (OLMI) is the space between the lateral aspect of the dens axis and the medial circumference of the massa lateralis atlantis. The position of OLMI asymmetry as a normal variant or pathologic finding is an area of debate and clinical interest in trauma patients. We designed this prospective study to lay a framework for proposing strategies for the appropriate use of OLMI.


A total of 301 adult patients admitted for trauma were included. Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the cervical spine were performed and examined for the presence OLMI asymmetry and bony/ligamentous lesions of the occipitoatlantoaxial complex.


Head rotation is linked to the occurrence of OLMI asymmetry. Reliable OLMI asymmetry evaluation is limited by observer agreement under a threshold value of 1.0 mm. In all, 86 patients (28.6 %) were found to have OLMI asymmetry on CT after trauma. Among these patients, 17.4 % had a bony/ligamentous lesion of the occipitoatlantoaxial complex. Among the patients without OLMI asymmetry, 8.8 % were found to have such lesions.


OLMI asymmetry should only be investigated by CT scans of the head in optimal position and with the threshold value of 1.0 mm. OLMI asymmetry should not be used alone as a sign of a cervical spine lesion. MRI should be performed if: (1) the physician has a high degree of suspicion of a cervical spine lesion; (2) OLMI asymmetry was demonstrated on a technically adequate CT scan; (3) clinical symptoms persist in patients with OLMI asymmetry when no acute MRI was performed.


Cervical Spine Trauma Patient Interobserver Agreement Head Rotation Cervical Spine Injury 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



Our gratitude goes to Professor Ulrich Theodor Hopt (Director of the Department for Surgery, University Hospital Freiburg im Breisgau) for his support. The authors thank Marion Racher MD, for her advice. We also thank anonymous referees for helpful comments.


  1. 1.
    Como JJ, Diaz JJ, Dunham CM et al (2009) Practice management guidelines for identification of cervical spine injuries following trauma: update from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma practice management guidelines committee. J Trauma 67:651–659PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Richards PJ (2005) Cervical spine clearance: a review. Injury 36:248–269PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bucholz RW, Burkhead WZ (1979) The pathological anatomy of fatal atlanto-occipital dislocations. J Bone Joint Surg Am 61:249–250Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hoffman JR, Mower WR, Wolfson AB et al (2000) Validity of a set of clinical criteria to rule out injury to the cervical spine in patients with blunt trauma: National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study Group. N Engl J Med 343:94–99PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Stiell IG, Clement CM, McKnight RD et al (2003) The Canadian C-spine rule versus the NEXUS low-risk criteria in patients with trauma. N Engl J Med 349:2510–2518PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Como JJ, Leukhardt WH, Anderson JS et al (2011) Computed tomography alone may clear the cervical spine in obtunded blunt trauma patients: a prospective evaluation of a revised protocol. J Trauma 70:345–349PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Panczykowski DM, Tomycz ND, Okonkwo DO (2011) Comparative effectiveness of using computed tomography alone to exclude cervical spine injuries in obtunded or intubated patients: meta-analysis of 14,327 patients with blunt trauma. J Neurosurg 115:541–549PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Daffner RH, Dalinka MK, Alazaki N, et al (2003) Suspected cervical spine trauma. American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria. Reston, VA, American College of RadiologyGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Spence KF, Decker S, Sell KW (1970) Bursting atlantal fracture associated with rupture of the transverse ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Am 52:543–549PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Roberge RJ (1991) Facilitating cervical spine radiography in blunt trauma. Emerg Med Clin North Am 9:733–742PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fielding JW, Cochrane GVB, Lawsing JF III et al (1974) Tears of the transverse ligament of the atlas. J Bone Joint Surg Am 56:1683–1691PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fielding JW, Hawkins RJ (1977) Atlanto-axial rotatory fixation (fixed rotatory subluxation of the atlanto-axial joint). J Bone Joint Surg Am 59:37–44PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Iannacone WM, DeLong WG Jr, Born CT et al (1990) Dynamic computerized tomography of the occiput-atlas-axis complex in trauma patients with odontoid lateral mass asymmetry. J Trauma 30:1501–1505PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ellis GL (1991) Imaging of the atlas (C1) and axis (C2). Emerg Med Clin North Am 9:719–732PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wortzmann G, Deware FP (1968) Rotatory fixation of the atlanto-axial joint: rotational atlantoaxial subluxation. Radiology 90:479–487Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Töndury G, Tillmann B (2003) Rumpf. In: Leonhardt H, Tillmann B, Töndury G, et al (eds). Rauber/Kopsch, Anatomie des Menschen. Vol I. Bewegungsapparat. 3rd edn. Georg Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart, pp 175–258Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Williams A, Newell RLM (2005) Back and macroscopic anatomy of the spinal cord. In: Standring S (ed) Gray’s Anatomy. The Anatomical Basis of Clinical Practice. Elsevier, London, pp 727–800Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Harty JA, Lenehan B, O’Rourke SK (2005) Odontoid lateral mass asymmetry: do we over-investigate? Emerg Med 22:625–627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Chen Y, Zhuang Z, Qi W et al (2011) A three-dimensional study of the atlantodental interval in a normal Chinese population using reformatted computed tomography. Surg Radiol Anat 33:801–806PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Harris JH, Yeakley JW (1992) Hyperextension-dislocation of the cervical spine. J Bone Joint Surg Br 74:567–570PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rickenbacher J, Landolt AM, Theiler TK (1982) Rücken. In: von Lanz T, Wachsmuth W (eds) Praktische Anatomie, 1st edn. Springer Verlag, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Scheuer L, Black S (2000) Developmental Juvenile Osteology. Academic Press, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wolansky LJ, Rajaraman V, Seo C et al (1999) The lateral atlanto-dens interval: normal range of asymmetry. Emerg Radiol 6:290–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Dvorak J, Panjabi MM (1987) Functional anatomy of the alar ligaments. Spine 12:183–189PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Dvorak J, Hayek J, Zehnder R (1987) CT-functional diagnostics of the rotatory instability of the upper cervical spine. Part 2. An evaluation on healthy adults and patients with suspected instability. Spine 12:726–731PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Dvorak J, Schneider E, Saldinger P et al (1988) Biomechanics of the craniocervical region: the alar and transverse ligaments. J Orthop Res 6:452–461PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Crisco JJ, Panjabi MM, Dvorak J (1991) A model of the alar ligaments of the upper cervical spine in axial rotation. J Biomech 24:607–614PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Panjabi MM, Dvorak J, Crisco JJ et al (1991) Effects of alar ligament transection on upper cervical spine rotation. J Orthop Res 9:584–593PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Panjabi MM, Oxland TR, Parks EH (1991) Quantitative anatomy of cervical spine ligaments. Part I. Upper cervical spine. J Spinal Disord 4:270–276PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Saternus KS (1981) Verletzungen der Occipito-Atlanto-Axis-Region. Z Orthop 119:662–664Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lee S, Joyce S, Seeger J (1986) Asymmetry of the odontoid-lateral mass interspaces: a radiographic finding of questionable significance. Ann Emerg Med 15:1173–1176PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sutherland JP, Yaszemski MJ, White AA (1995) Radiographic appearance of the odontoid lateral mass interspace in the occipitoatlantoaxial complex. Spine 20:2221–2225PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Mirvis SE (1998) How much lateral atlantodental interval asymmetry and atlantoaxial lateral mass asymmetry is acceptable on an open-mouth odontoid radiograph, and when is additional investigation necessary? AJR Am J Roentgenol 170:1106–1107PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Harty JA, Sparkes J, McCormack D et al (2003) Recognition of progressive atlanto-occipital dislocation (by changing neurologic status and clinical deformity). J Orthop Trauma 17:299–302PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Dumas JL, Thoreux P, Attali P et al (1994) Three-dimensional CT analysis of atlantoaxial rotation: results in the normal subject. Surg Radiol Anat 16:199–204PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Roche CJ, King SJ, Dangerfield PH et al (2002) The atlanto-axial joint: physiological range of rotation on MRI and CT. Clin Radiol 57:103–108PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Dugailly PM, Sobczak S, Sholukha V et al (2010) In vitro 3D-kinematics of the upper cervical spine: helical axis and simulation for axial rotation and flexion extension. Surg Radiol Anat 32:141–151PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Keats TE (1973) Atlas of Normal Roentgen Variants That May Simulate Disease, 1st edn. Year Book, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Brossmann J, Czerny C, Freyschmidt J (2001) Freyschmidt’s “Köhler/Zimmer” Grenzen des Normalen und Anfänge des Pathologischen in der Radiologie des kindlichen und erwachsenen Skeletts. Georg Thieme Verlag, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Keats TE, Sistrom C (2001) Atlas of Radiologic Measurement. 7th edn. Mosby, St. LouisGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Goldberg W, Mueller C, Panacek E et al (2001) Distribution and patterns of blunt traumatic cervical spine injury. Ann Emerg Med 38:17–21PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Harris MB, Waguespack AM, Kronlage SC (1997) ‘Clearing’ cervical spine injuries in polytrauma patients: is it really safe to remove the collar? Orthopedics 20:903–907PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Marion D, Domeier R, Dunham CM et al (1998) Practice Management Guidelines for Identifying Cervical Spine Injuries Following Trauma. Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma, Chicago, pp 1–10Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Pasqualle M (1998) Practical management guidelines for identifying cervical spine instability after trauma. J Trauma 44:945–946CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Grossman MD, Reilly PM, Gillett T et al (1999) National survey of the incidence of cervical spine injury and approach to cervical spine clearance in U.S. trauma centers. J Trauma 47:684–690PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Harris MB, Kronlage SC, Carboni PA et al (2000) Evaluation of the cervical spine in the polytrauma patient. Spine 25:2884–2892PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Marion D, Domeier R, Dunham CM, et al (2000) Determination of cervical spine stability in trauma patients (update of the 1997 EAST Cervical Spine Clearance Document). Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma, Chicago, pp 1–9Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Gupta A, Masriws EI (1989) Multilevel spinal injuries, incidence, distribution and neurological patterns. J Bone Joint Surg Br 71:692–695PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Lockey AS, Handley R, Willett K (1998) ‘Clearance’ of cervical spine injury in the obtunded patient. Injury 29:493–497PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Lecky F, Woodford M, Yates DW (2000) Trends in trauma care in England and Wales 1989–97: UK Trauma Audit and Research Network. Lancet 355:1771–1775PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    American College of Radiology Committee on Appropriateness Criteria (2009) ACR Appropriateness Criteria: Suspected Spine Trauma. Reston, VA, American College of RadiologyGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Ajmal M, O’Rourke SK (2005) Odontoid lateral mass interval (OLMI) asymmetry and rotatory subluxation: a retrospective study in cervical spine injury. J Surg Orthop Adv 14:23–26PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Hohl M, Baker HR (1964) The atlanto-axial joint. Roentgenographic and anatomical study of normal and abnormal motion. J Bone Joint Surg Am 46:1739–1752PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Franck Billmann
    • 1
    Email author
  • Therezia Bokor-Billmann
    • 1
  • Claude Burnett
    • 2
  • Erhard Kiffner
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Abdominal, Endocrine, and Vascular SurgerySt. Vincentius Kliniken, University of FreiburgKarlsruheGermany
  2. 2.Department of SurgeryUSA Health CenterVicenzaItaly

Personalised recommendations