World Journal of Surgery

, Volume 37, Issue 5, pp 1021–1027

Selective Policy of No Drain after Pancreaticoduodenectomy Is a Valid Option in Patients at Low Risk of Pancreatic Fistula: A Case-Control Analysis

  • Chetana Lim
  • Safi Dokmak
  • François Cauchy
  • Beatrice Aussilhou
  • Jacques Belghiti
  • Alain Sauvanet
Article

Abstract

Background

Abdominal drainage is routinely performed after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), but this policy has recently been challenged. The aim of the present study was to assess whether abdominal drainage could be omitted after PD in patients at low risk of pancreatic fistula (PF).

Methods

From 2009 to 2011, 27 consecutive patients underwent PD without abdominal drainage. Their preoperative characteristics and postoperative outcomes were compared to those of 27 matched patients undergoing PD with prophylactic drainage. Patients were matched 1:1 in terms of demographic data, preoperative weight loss, preoperative biliary drainage, surgical indication, and main risk factors of PF (pancreatic texture, main duct size, and body mass index).

Results

Overall morbidity rates (no drainage, 56 % vs. drainage, 70 %; p < 0.4) and operative mortality (1 patient in each group) were similar in both groups. The two groups did not differ significantly in terms of delayed gastric emptying (15 vs. 11 %; p = 0.68), and chylous ascites (4 vs. 15 %; p = 0.35). Radiological or surgical interventions for surgical complications were required in 2 patients (1 in each group). Pancreatic fistula rate (0 vs. 22 %; p = 0.009) and hospital stay (10 vs. 15 days; p = 0.004) were significantly reduced in the no drainage group as compared to the drainage group. The hospital readmission rate was similar in the two groups (no drainage, 3.7 vs. 0 %; p = 0.31).

Conclusions

This study suggests that abdominal drainage should not be considered routinely after PD in patients at low risk of PF. A no drain policy may reduce hospital stay after PD.

References

  1. 1.
    Cameron JL, Pitt HA, Yeo CJ et al (1993) One hundred and forty-five consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies without mortality. Ann Surg 217:430–435PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gouma DJ, van Geenen RC, van Gulik TM et al (2000) Rates of complications and death after pancreaticoduodenectomy: risk factors and the impact of hospital volume. Ann Surg 232:786–795PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Trede M, Schwall G, Saeger HD et al (1990) Survival after pancreatoduodenectomy. 118 consecutive resections without an operative mortality. Ann Surg 211:447–458PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Sohn TA et al (1997) Six hundred fifty consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies in the 1990s: pathology, complications, and outcomes. Ann Surg 226:248–257PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    DeOliveira ML, Winter JM, Schafer M et al (2006) Assessment of complications after pancreatic surgery: a novel grading system applied to 633 patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg 244:931–937PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lin JW, Cameron JL, Yeo CJ et al (2004) Risk factors and outcomes in postpancreaticoduodenectomy pancreaticocutaneous fistula. J Gastrointest Surg 8:951–959PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Muscari F, Suc B, Kirzin S et al (2006) Risk factors for mortality and intra-abdominal complications after pancreatoduodenectomy: multivariate analysis in 300 patients. Surgery 139:591–598PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pratt WB, Callery MP, Vollmer CM Jr (2008) Risk prediction for development of pancreatic fistula using the ISGPF classification scheme. World J Surg 32:419–428. doi:10.1007/s00268-007-9388-5 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Conlon KC, Labow D, Leung D et al (2001) Prospective randomized clinical trial of the value of intraperitoneal drainage after pancreatic resection. Ann Surg 234:487–493PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gaujoux S, Cortes A, Couvelard A et al (2010) Fatty pancreas and increased body mass index are risk factors of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Surgery 148:15–23PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Report of a WHO Expert Committee (1995) Physical status: the use and interpretation of anthropometry. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser 854:1–452Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML et al (2009) The Clavien–Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250:187–196PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G et al (2005) Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 138:8–13PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Koch M, Garden OJ, Padbury R et al (2011) Bile leakage after hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: a definition and grading of severity by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery. Surgery 149:680–688PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wente MN, Bassi C, Dervenis C et al (2007) Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery: a suggested definition by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 142:761–768PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wente MN, Veit JA, Bassi C et al (2007) Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH): an International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definition. Surgery 142:20–25PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bassi C, Molinari E, Malleo G et al (2010) Early versus late drain removal after standard pancreatic resections: results of a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg 252:207–214PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Heslin MJ, Harrison LE, Brooks AD et al (1998) Is intra-abdominal drainage necessary after pancreaticoduodenectomy? J Gastrointest Surg 2:373–378PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kawai M, Tani M, Terasawa H et al (2006) Early removal of prophylactic drains reduces the risk of intra-abdominal infections in patients with pancreatic head resection: prospective study for 104 consecutive patients. Ann Surg 244:1–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Diener MK, Tadjalli-Mehr K, Wente MN et al (2011) Risk-benefit assessment of closed intra-abdominal drains after pancreatic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the current state of evidence. Langenbecks Arch Surg 396:41–52PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Munoz-Bongrand N, Sauvanet A, Denys A et al (2004) Conservative management of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy with pancreaticogastrostomy. J Am Coll Surg 199:198–203PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bilimoria MM, Cormier JN, Mun Y et al (2003) Pancreatic leak after left pancreatectomy is reduced following main pancreatic duct ligation. Br J Surg 90:190–196PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pannegeon V, Pessaux P, Sauvanet A et al (2006) Pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy: predictive risk factors and value of conservative treatment. Arch Surg 141:1071–1076PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sledzianowski JF, Duffas JP, Muscari F et al (2005) Risk factors for mortality and intra-abdominal morbidity after distal pancreatectomy. Surgery 137:180–185PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Goh BK, Tan YM, Chung YF et al (2008) Critical appraisal of 232 consecutive distal pancreatectomies with emphasis on risk factors, outcome, and management of the postoperative pancreatic fistula: a 21-year experience at a single institution. Arch Surg 143:956–965PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mathur A, Pitt HA, Marine M et al (2007) Fatty pancreas: a factor in postoperative pancreatic fistula. Ann Surg 246:1058–1064PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rosso E, Casnedi S, Pessaux P et al (2009) The role of “fatty pancreas” and of BMI in the occurrence of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 13:1845–1851PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Gurusamy KS, Samraj K, Davidson BR (2007) Routine abdominal drainage for uncomplicated liver resection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (3):CD006232Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Yeo CJ (2010) Pancreatic surgery 101: drain, no drain, early drain removal, or late drain removal. What are the data? Where do we go from here? Ann Surg 252:215–216PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chetana Lim
    • 1
  • Safi Dokmak
    • 1
  • François Cauchy
    • 1
  • Beatrice Aussilhou
    • 1
  • Jacques Belghiti
    • 1
  • Alain Sauvanet
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP)Beaujon HospitalClichyFrance

Personalised recommendations