Advertisement

World Journal of Surgery

, Volume 36, Issue 11, pp 2654–2658 | Cite as

Comparison of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis within and Beyond 72 h of Symptom Onset During Emergency Admissions

  • Bin ZhuEmail author
  • Zhanzhi Zhang
  • Yan Wang
  • Ke Gong
  • Yiping Lu
  • Nengwei ZhangEmail author
Article

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) performed for acute cholecystitis (AC) is usually advised within 72 h of symptom onset. It can be difficult to accommodate all these patients within 72 h. LC beyond this early phase potentially increases the chances of LC-related complications. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of LC both within and beyond 72 h of presentation during the emergency admission.

Methods

A retrospective clinical study was performed from February 2004 to December 2009. A total of 133 patients underwent LC for AC during the emergency admission according to the protocol: 34 patients underwent early LC (ELC) (i.e., operation within 72 h of symptom onset) and 99 underwent late LC (LLC) (i.e., operation beyond 72 h of symptom onset). Pathologic type of cholecystitis, duration of the procedure, conversion rate, complications, length of hospital stay (LOS), and total charges were compared between the two groups.

Results

Patients undergoing ELC experienced a significantly shorter operating time (44.1 ± 5.32 vs. 66.4 ± 3.05 min, p < 0.01). Most of the AC (95/133, 71 %) was pathologically simple cholecystitis. There was no significant difference regarding wound infection rates [1/34 (2.94 %) vs. 2/99 (2.02 %), p > 0.05] or postoperative hospital stay (6.50 ± 1.31 vs. 6.67 ± 0.73, p > 0.05) between groups. There were no conversions to open cholecystectomy, no biliary tract injury or biliary leak, no other complications, and no 30-day readmission rates in either group. ELC was less costly than LLC (6,692 ± 794 vs. 8,378 ± 802 RMB, p < 0.05).

Conclusions

Both ELC and LLC are safe for treating of AC, but the operative difficulty of LLC is greater. ELC is superior to LLC as it tends to shorten the total LOS and is less expensive.

Keywords

Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Cholecystitis Symptom Onset Acute Cholecystitis Bile Duct Injury 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Csikesz N, Ricciardi R, Tseng JF et al (2008) Current status of surgical management of acute cholecystitis in the United States. World J Surg 32:2230–2236PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    González-Rodríguez FJ, Paredes-Cotoré JP, Pontón C et al (2009) Early or delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis? Conclusions of a controlled trial. Hepatogastroenterology 56:11–16PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yamashita Y, Takada T, Hirata K (2006) A survey of the timing and approach to the surgical. management of patients with acute cholecystitis in Japanese hospitals. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 13:409–415PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gananadha S, Fergusson J (2009) Moderate acute cholecystitis: to cut now or to cut later. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 24:1806–1807PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Casillas RA, Yegiyants S, Collins JC (2008) Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the preferred management of acute cholecystitis. Arch Surg 143:533–537PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gurusamy K, Samraj K, Gluud C et al (2010) Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on the safety and effectiveness of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Br J Surg 97:141–150PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Siddiqui T, MacDonald A, Chong PS et al (2008) Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Am J Surg 195:40–47PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tzovaras G, Zacharoulis D, Liakou P et al (2006) Timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a prospective nonrandomized study. World J Gastroenterol 12:5528–5531PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mercer SJ, Knight JS, Toh SK et al (2004) Implementation of a specialist-led service for the management of acute gallstone disease. Br J Surg 91:504–508PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Farooq T, Buchanan G, Manda V et al (2009) Is early laparoscopic cholecystectomy safe after the “safe period”? J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Technol A 19:471–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wilson E, Gurusamy K, Gluud C et al (2010) Cost-utility and value-of-information analysis of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Br J Surg 97:210–219PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Low SW, Iyer SG, Chang SK et al (2009) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: safe implementation of successful strategies to reduce conversion rates. Surg Endosc 23:2424–2429PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kortram K, Reinders JS, van Ramshorst B et al (2010) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis should be performed by a laparoscopic surgeon. Surg Endosc 24:2206–2209PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Saeb-Parsy K, Mills A, Rang C et al (2010) Emergency laparoscopic cholecystectomy in an unselected cohort: a safe and viable option in a specialist centre. Int J Surg 8:489–493PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of General Surgery, Laparoscopic Surgical Center, Beijing Shijitan HospitalCapital Medical UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations