World Journal of Surgery

, Volume 36, Issue 7, pp 1453–1459

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Primary Breast Cancer: Window to Management of the Axilla

  • Ashwini Kumar
  • Ruchir Puri
  • Pranjali V. Gadgil
  • Ismail Jatoi
Article

Abstract

In patients with primary breast cancer, several large, randomized prospective trials have shown that sentinel node biopsy (SNB) substantially reduces the morbidity associated with axillary surgery compared with formal axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Moreover, the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) B-32 trial has demonstrated that when the sentinel node reveals no evidence of metastatic disease, then no further ALND is required. Recently, the results of the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG) Z0011 trial have challenged the notion that all patients with metastases to the sentinel node require ALND. The results of this trial suggest that in selected sentinel node-positive patients, ALND can be potentially avoided. Yet, some concerns about the ACOSOG Z0011 trial have been raised, and these concerns may have implications in the widespread implementation of the results of this trial. Since the advent of the SNB technology, occult metastases within the sentinel node are frequently observed, and the significance of these findings remains controversial. Finally, this review considers special situations, such as pregnancy and the neoadjuvant setting, where the use of SNB should be applied judiciously. The SNB technology has dramatically improved the quality of life for women with breast cancer, and further modifications of its role in breast cancer treatment should be based on evidence obtained from randomized, controlled trials.

References

  1. 1.
    Halsted WS (1907) I. The results of radical operations for the cure of carcinoma of the breast. Ann Surg 46(1):1–19PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fisher B, Montague E, Redmond C et al (1977) Comparison of radical mastectomy with alternative treatments for primary breast cancer. A first report of results from a prospective randomized clinical trial. Cancer 39(6 Suppl):2827–2839PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Devitt JE (1965) The significance of regional lymph node metastases in breast carcinoma. Can Med Assoc J 93:289–293PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cancer Research Campaign Working Party (1980) Cancer research campaign (King’s/Cambridge) trial for early breast cancer. A detailed update at the tenth year. Lancet 2(8185):55–60Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Veronesi U, Paganelli G, Viale G et al (2003) A randomized comparison of sentinel-node biopsy with routine axillary dissection in breast cancer. N Engl J Med 349(6):546–553PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    David NK, Stewart JA, Thomas BJ et al (2007) Technical outcomes of sentinel-lymph-node resection and conventional axillary-lymph-node dissection in patients with clinically node-negative breast cancer: results from the NSABP B-32 randomised phase III trial. Lancet Oncol 8(10):881–888CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mansel RE, Fallowfield L, Kissin M et al (2006) Randomized multicenter trial of sentinel node biopsy versus standard axillary treatment in operable breast cancer: The ALMANAC Trial. JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 98(9):599–609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zavagno G, De Salvo GL, Scalco G et al (2008) A randomized clinical trial on sentinel lymph node biopsy versus axillary lymph node dissection in breast cancer. Ann Surg 247(2):207–213PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Del Bianco P, Zavagno G, Burelli P et al (2008) Morbidity comparison of sentinel lymph node biopsy versus conventional axillary lymph node dissection for breast cancer patients: results of the sentinella-GIVOM Italian randomised clinical trial. Eur J Surg Oncol 34(5):508–513PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Purushotham AD (2005) Morbidity after sentinel lymph node biopsy in primary breast cancer: results from a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 23(19):4312–4321PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gill G (2008) Sentinel-lymph-node-based management or routine axillary clearance? one-year outcomes of sentinel node biopsy versus axillary clearance (SNAC): a randomized controlled surgical trial. Ann Surg Oncol 16(2):266–275PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    McLaughlin SA, Wright MJ, Morris KT et al (2008) Prevalence of lymphedema in women with breast cancer 5 years after sentinel lymph node biopsy or axillary dissection: objective measurements. J Clin Oncol 26(32):5213–5219PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kett K, Varga G, Lukacs L (1970) Direct lymphography of the breast. Lymphology 3(1):2–12PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Krag DN, Weaver DL, Alex JC, Fairbank JT (1993) Surgical resection and radiolocalization of the sentinel lymph node in breast cancer using a gamma probe. Surg Oncol 2(6):335–339 discussion 340PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Giuliano AE, Kirgan DM, Guenther JM, Morton DL (1994) Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy for breast cancer. Ann Surg 220(3):391–398 discussion 398-401PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Albertini JJ, Lyman GH, Cox C et al (1996) Lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy in the patient with breast cancer. JAMA 276(22):1818–1822PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cox CE, Haddad F, Bass S et al (1998) Lymphatic mapping in the treatment of breast cancer. Oncology (Williston Park) 12(9):1283–1292 discussion 1293-1284, 1297-1288Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Morrow M, Rademaker AW, Bethke KP et al (1999) Learning sentinel node biopsy: results of a prospective randomized trial of two techniques. Surgery 126(4):714–720 discussion 720-722PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ashikaga T, Krag DN, Land SR et al (2010) Morbidity results from the NSABP B-32 trial comparing sentinel lymph node dissection versus axillary dissection. J Surg Oncol 102(2):111–118PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kell MR, Burke JP, Barry M, Morrow M (2010) Outcome of axillary staging in early breast cancer: a meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 120(2):441–447PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Singletary SE, Allred C, Ashley P et al (2002) Revision of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 20(17):3628–3636PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Weaver DL, Ashikaga T, Krag DN et al (2011) Effect of occult metastases on survival in node-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med 364(5):412–421PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Giuliano AE, Hawes D, Ballman KV et al (2011) Association of occult metastases in sentinel lymph nodes and bone marrow with survival among women with early-stage invasive breast cancer. JAMA 306(4):385–393PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Duncan PG, Pope WD, Cohen MM, Greer N (1986) Fetal risk of anesthesia and surgery during pregnancy. Anesthesiology 64(6):790–794PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gentilini O, Masullo M, Rotmensz N et al (2005) Breast cancer diagnosed during pregnancy and lactation: biological features and treatment options. Eur J Surg Oncol 31(3):232–236PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Stearns V, Ewing CA, Slack R, Penannen MF, Hayes DF, Tsangaris TN (2002) Sentinel lymphadenectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer may reliably represent the axilla except for inflammatory breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 9(3):235–242PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hidar S, Bibi M, Gharbi O et al (2009) Sentinel lymph node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in inflammatory breast cancer. Int J Surg 7(3):272–275PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hunt KK, Yi M, Mittendorf EA et al (2009) Sentinel lymph node surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is accurate and reduces the need for axillary dissection in breast cancer patients. Ann Surg 250(4):558–566PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Mamounas EP, Brown A, Anderson S et al (2005) Sentinel node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: results from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol B-27. J Clin Oncol 23(12):2694–2702PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Reynolds C, Mick R, Donohue JH et al (1999) Sentinel lymph node biopsy with metastasis: can axillary dissection be avoided in some patients with breast cancer? J Clin Oncol 17(6):1720–1726PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Krag DN (2004) NSABP-32: Phase III, randomized trial comparing axillary resection with sentinal lymph node dissection: a description of the trial. Ann Surg Oncol 11(3 Suppl):208S–210SPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Degnim AC, Griffith KA, Sabel MS et al (2003) Clinicopathologic features of metastasis in nonsentinel lymph nodes of breast carcinoma patients. Cancer 98(11):2307–2315PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Van Zee KJ, Manasseh DM, Bevilacqua JL et al (2003) A nomogram for predicting the likelihood of additional nodal metastases in breast cancer patients with a positive sentinel node biopsy. Ann Surg Oncol 10(10):1140–1151PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Pal A, Provenzano E, Duffy SW, Pinder SE, Purushotham AD (2008) A model for predicting non-sentinel lymph node metastatic disease when the sentinel lymph node is positive. Br J Surg 95(3):302–309PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kohrt HE, Olshen RA, Bermas HR et al (2008) New models and online calculator for predicting non-sentinel lymph node status in sentinel lymph node positive breast cancer patients. BMC Cancer 8:66PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Mittendorf EA, Hunt KK, Boughey JC et al (2012) Incorporation of sentinel lymph node metastasis size into a nomogram predicting nonsentinel lymph node involvement in breast cancer patients with a positive sentinel lymph node. Ann Surg 255(1):109–115PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Jeruss JS, Newman LA, Ayers GD et al (2008) Factors predicting additional disease in the axilla in patients with positive sentinel lymph nodes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Cancer 112(12):2646–2654PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Giuliano AE, Hunt KK, Ballman KV et al (2011) Axillary dissection vs no axillary dissection in women with invasive breast cancer and sentinel node metastasis: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 305(6):569–575PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Caudle AS, Hunt KK, Kuerer HM et al (2011) Multidisciplinary considerations in the implementation of the findings from the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG) Z0011 study: a practice-changing trial. Ann Surg Oncol 18(9):2407–2412PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Jatoi I, Chen BE, Anderson WF, Rosenberg PS (2007) Breast cancer mortality trends in the United States according to estrogen receptor status and age at diagnosis. J Clin Oncol 25(13):1683–1690PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Jatoi I (2011) Axillary vs sentinel lymph node dissection for invasive breast cancer. JAMA 305(22):2288 author reply 2290-2281PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ashwini Kumar
    • 1
  • Ruchir Puri
    • 1
  • Pranjali V. Gadgil
    • 1
  • Ismail Jatoi
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryUniversity of Texas Health Science CenterSan AntonioUSA

Personalised recommendations