World Journal of Surgery

, Volume 36, Issue 7, pp 1486–1497

Update on Breast Reconstruction Techniques and Indications

  • Jean-Yves Petit
  • Mario Rietjens
  • Visnu Lohsiriwat
  • Piercarlo Rey
  • Cristina Garusi
  • Francesca De Lorenzi
  • Stefano Martella
  • Andrea Manconi
  • Benedetta Barbieri
  • Krishna B. Clough
Article

Abstract

Breast reconstruction is considered as part of the breast cancer treatment when a mastectomy is required. Implants or expanders are the most frequent techniques used for the reconstructions. Expander provides usually a better symmetry. A contralateral mastoplasty often is required to improve the symmetry. The nipple areola complex, which can be preserved in certain conditions, is usually removed and can be reconstructed in a second stage under local anesthesia. In case of radical mastectomy and/or radiotherapy, a musculocutaneous flap, such as rectus abdominis or latissimus dorsi autologous flaps, is required. When microsurgical facilities are available, free or perforator flaps respecting the muscle are preferred to decrease the donor site complications. In situ carcinomas or prophylactic mastectomy can be reconstructed immediately as well as invasive carcinoma according to the recent literature. Locally advanced breast cancer can be reconstructed after complete oncologic treatment. Radiotherapy of the thoracic wall is proposed in case of lymph node metastases, raising the discussion about the technique choice and the timing of the reconstruction. Plastic surgery procedures can improve the cosmetic results of the conservative surgery, also extending its indications and reducing both mastectomy and reexcision rates. Oncoplasty techniques are becoming more and more sophisticated, requiring the skill of trained plastic surgeons. Numerous publications confirm the psychosocial benefit resulting from the breast reconstruction.

References

  1. 1.
    Halsted WS (1907) The results of radical operations for the cure of carcinoma of the breast. Ann Surg 46:1–19PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Veronesi U, Saccozzi R, Delvecchio M et al (1981) Comparing radical-mastectomy with quadrantectomy, axillary dissection, and radiotherapy in patients with small cancers of the breast. N Engl J Med 305:6–11PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J et al (2002) Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 347:1233–1241PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Anderson A, Burgoyne G, Mokbel K (2009) Oncological outcome and patient’s satisfaction of skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction: a prospective observational study. Cancer Res 69:683S–684SGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gerber B, Krause A, Dieterich M et al (2009) The oncological safety of skin sparing mastectomy with conservation of the nipple-areola complex and autologous reconstruction: an extended follow-up study. Ann Surg 249:461–468PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rainsbury RM (2006) Skin-sparing mastectomy. Br J Surg 93:276–281PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Petit JY, Veronesi U, Luini A et al (2005) When mastectomy becomes inevitable: the nipple-sparing approach. Breast 14:527–531PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Petit JY, Veronesi U, Orecchia R et al (2006) Nipple-sparing mastectomy in association with intra operative radiotherapy (ELIOT): a new type of mastectomy for breast cancer treatment. Breast Cancer Res Treat 96:47–51PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Petit JY, Veronesi U, Orecchia R et al (2009) Nipple sparing mastectomy with nipple areola intraoperative radiotherapy: one thousand and one cases of a five years experience at the European institute of oncology of Milan (EIO). Breast Cancer Res Treat 117:333–338PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Petit JY, Gentilini O, Rotmensz N et al (2008) Oncological results of immediate breast reconstruction: long term follow-up of a large series at a single institution. Breast Cancer Res Treat 112:545–549PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rusby JE, Smith BL, Gui GPH (2010) Nipple-sparing mastectomy. Br J Surg 97:305–316PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Spear SL, Pelletiere CV (2004) Immediate breast reconstruction in two stages using textured, integrated-valve tissue expanders and breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 113:2098–2103PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    De Lorenzi F, Rietjens M, Soresina M et al (2010) Immediate breast reconstruction in the elderly: can it be considered an integral step of breast cancer treatment? The experience of the European Institute of Oncology Milan. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 63:511–515PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bezuhly M, Temple C, Sigurdson LJ et al (2009) Immediate postmastectomy reconstruction is associated with improved breast cancer-specific survival: evidence and new challenges from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Cancer 115:4648–4654PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Benediktsson K, Perbeck L (2006) Capsular contracture around saline-filled and textured subcutaneously-placed implants in irradiated and non-irradiated breast cancer patients: five years of monitoring of a prospective trial. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 59:27–34PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chang DW, Barnea Y, Robb GL (2008) Effects of an autologous flap combined with an implant for breast reconstruction: an evaluation of 1000 consecutive reconstructions of previously irradiated breasts. Plast Reconstr Surg 122:356–362PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kronowitz SJ, Kuerer HM (2006) Advances and surgical decision-making for breast reconstruction. Cancer 107:893–907PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cardoso MJ, Macmillan RD, Merck B et al (2010) Training in oncoplastic surgery: an international consensus. The 7th Portuguese Senology Congress, Vilamoura, 2009. Breast 19:538–540PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Malycha PL, Gough IR, Margaritoni M et al (2008) Oncoplastic Breast Surgery: a global perspective on practice, availability, and training. World J Surg 32:2570–2577. doi:10.1007/s00268-008-9635-4 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gabriel SE, Ofallon WM, Kurland LT et al (1994) Risk of connective-tissue diseases and other disorders after breast implantation. N Engl J Med 330:1697–1702PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Moynihan R (2005) FDA panel approves one make of silicone breast implant in the US. Br Med J 330:919CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Spear SL, Jesperson MR (2010) Breast implants: saline or silicone? Aesthet Surg 30:557–570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Young VL, Watson ME (2001) Breast implant research: where we have been, where we are, where we need to go. Clin Plast Surg 28:451–454PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Coleman DJ, Foo ITH, Sharpe DT (1991) Textured or smooth implants for breast augmentation - a prospective controlled trial. Br J Plast Surg 44:444–448PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Asplund O (1984) Capsular contracture in silicone gel and saline–filled breast implants after reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 73:270–275PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Clough KB, O’Donoghue JM, Fitoussi AD et al (2001) Prospective evaluation of late cosmetic results following breast reconstruction: I. Implant reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 107:1702–1709PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Joanna Nguyen T, Carey JN, Wong AK (2011) Use of human acellular dermal matrix in implant–based breast reconstruction: evaluating the evidence. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 64:1553–1561PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Garwood ER, Moore D, Ewing C et al (2009) Total skin-sparing mastectomy: complications and local recurrence rates in two cohorts of patients. Ann Surg 249:26–32PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Cunningham BL, Lokeh A, Gutowski KA (2000) Saline-filled breast implant safety and efficacy: a multicenter retrospective review. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 105:2143–2149PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Barreau-Pouhaer L, Le MG, Rietjens M et al (1992) Risk factors for failure of immediate breast reconstruction with prosthesis after total mastectomy for breast cancer. Cancer 70:1145–1151PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Rey P, Martinelli G, Petit JY et al (2005) Immediate breast reconstruction and high-dose chemotherapy. Ann Plast Surg 55:250–254PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Cordeiro PG, McCarthy CM (2006) A single surgeon’s 12-year experience with tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction: Part I: a prospective analysis of early complications. Plast Reconstr Surg 118:825–831PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Scuderi N, Alfano C, Campus GV et al (2011) Multicenter study on breast reconstruction outcome using Becker implants. Aesthet Plast Surg 35:66–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Camilleri IG, Malata CM, Stavrianos S et al (1996) A review of 120 Becker permanent tissue expanders in reconstruction of the breast. Br J Plast Surg 49:346–351PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Petit J, Rietjens M, Garusi C (2001) Breast reconstructive techniques in cancer patients: which ones, when to apply, which immediate and long term risks? Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 38:231–239PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Wickman M, Jurell G (1997) Low capsular contraction rate after primary and secondary breast reconstruction with a textured expander prosthesis. Plast Reconstr Surg 99:669–692Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Hultman CS, Bostwick J 3rd (2001) Breast reconstruction following mastectomy: review of indications, methods, and outcomes. Breast Dis 12:113–130PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Delay E, Gounot N, Bouillot A et al (1998) Autologous latissimus breast reconstruction: a 3-year clinical experience with 100 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 102:1461–1478PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Clough KB, Louis-Sylvestre C, Fitoussi A et al (2002) Donor site sequelae after autologous breast reconstruction with an extended latissimus dorsi flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 109:1904–1911PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Button J, Scott J, Taghizadeh R et al (2010) Shoulder function following autologous latissimus dorsi breast reconstruction. A prospective three year observational study comparing quilting and non-quilting donor site techniques. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 63:1505–1512PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Hartrampf CR, Scheflan M, Black PW (1982) Breast reconstruction with a transverse abdominal island flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 69:216–224PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Clough KB, O’Donoghue JM, Fitoussi AD et al (2001) Prospective evaluation of late cosmetic results following breast reconstruction: II. TRAM flap reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 107:1710–1716PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Petit JY, Rietjens M, Ferreira MAR et al (1997) Abdominal sequelae after pedicled TRAM flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 99:723–729PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Petit JY, Rietjens M, Garusi C et al (2003) Abdominal complications and sequelae after breast reconstruction with pedicled TRAM flap: is there still an indication for pedicled TRAM in the year 2003? Plast Reconstr Surg 112:1063–1065PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Losken A, Carlson GW, Jones GE et al (2002) Significance of intraabdominal compartment pressures following TRAM flap breast reconstruction and the correlation of results. Plast Reconstr Surg 109:2257–2264PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Garvey PB, Buchel EW, Pockaj BA et al (2006) DIEP and pedicled TRAM flaps: a comparison of outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg 117:1711–1719PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Lejour M, Dome M (1991) Abdominal wall function after rectus abdominis transfer. Plast Reconstr Surg 87:1054–1068PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Rinker BD, Bowling JT, Vasconez HC (2007) Blood transfusion and risk of metastatic disease or recurrence in patients undergoing immediate TRAM flap breast reconstruction: a clinical study and meta-analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 119:2001–2007PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Curigliano G, Petit JY, Bertolini F et al (2005) Systemic effects of surgery: quantitative analysis of circulating basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF). Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and transforming growth factor beta (TGF-beta) in patients with breast cancer who underwent limited or extended surgery. Breast Cancer Res Treat 93:35–40PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Mehrara BJ, Santoro TD, Arcilla E et al (2006) Complications after microvascular breast reconstruction: experience with 1195 flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 118:1100–1109PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Van Landuyt K, Blondeel P, Hamdi M et al (2005) The versatile DIEP flap: its use in lower extremity reconstruction. Br J Plast Surg 58:2–13PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Saint-Cyr M, Youssef A, Bae HW et al (2007) Changing trends in recipient vessel selection for microvascular autologous breast reconstruction: an analysis of 1483 consecutive cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 119:1993–2000PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Schoeller T, Huemer GM, Wechselberger G (2008) The transverse musculocutaneous gracilis flap for breast reconstruction: guidelines for flap and patient selection. Plast Reconstr Surg 122:29–38PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Eskenazi LA (1993) One-stage nipple reconstruction with the modified star flap and immediate tattoo: a review of 100 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 92:671–680PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Zhong T, Antony A, Cordeiro P (2009) Surgical outcomes and nipple projection using the modified skate flap for nipple-areolar reconstruction in a series of 422 implant reconstructions. Ann Plast Surg 62:591–595PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Yadav BS, Sharma SC, Patel FD et al (2008) Second primary in the contralateral breast after treatment of breast cancer. Radiother Oncol 86:171–176PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Gao X, Fisher SG, Emami B (2003) Risk of second primary cancer in the contralateral breast in women treated for early-stage breast cancer: a population-based study. Int J Radiat Oncol Bio Phys 56:1038–1045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Rietjens M, Petit JY, Contesso G et al (1997) The role of reduction mammaplasty in oncology. Eur J Plast Surg 20:246–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Petit JY, Rietjens M, Contesso G et al (1997) Contralateral mastoplasty for breast reconstruction: a good opportunity for glandular exploration and occult carcinomas diagnosis. Ann Surg Oncol 4:511–515PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Petit JY, Rietjens M, Garusi C et al (1998) Integration of plastic surgery in the course of breast-conserving surgery for cancer to improve cosmetic results and radicality of tumor excision. Recent Results Cancer Res 152:202–211PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Clough KB, Kroll SS, Audretsch W (1999) An approach to the repair of partial mastectomy defects. Plast Reconstr Surg 104:409–420PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Clough KB, Kaufman GJ, Nos C et al (2010) Improving breast cancer surgery: a classification and quadrant per quadrant Atlas for oncoplastic surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 17:1375–1391PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Rietjens M, Urban CA, Rey PC et al (2007) Long-term oncological results of breast conservative treatment with oncoplastic surgery. Breast 16:387–395PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Petit JY, De Lorenzi F, Rietjens M et al (2007) Technical tricks to improve the cosmetic results of breast-conserving treatment. Breast 16:13–16PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Lohsiriwat V, Curigliano G, Rietjens M et al (2011) Autologous fat transplantation in patients with breast cancer: “SILENCING” or “FUELING” cancer recurrence? Breast [Epub ahead of print]Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Petit JY, Lohsiriwat V, Clough KB et al (2011) The oncological outcome and immediate surgical complication of lipofilling in breast cancer patients: a multicenter study, Milan-Paris-Lyon experiences of 646 lipofilling procedures. Plast Reconstr Surg 128:341–346PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Rietjens M, De Lorenzi F, Rossetto F et al (2011) Safety of fat grafting in secondary breast reconstruction after cancer. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 64:477–483PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Gendy RK, Able JA, Rainsbury RM (2003) Impact of skin-sparing mastectomy with immediate reconstruction and breast-sparing reconstruction with miniflaps on the outcomes of oncoplastic breast surgery. Br J Surg 90:433–439PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Yelland A, Rainsbury D (1999) The use of the latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap for immediate correction of the deformity resulting from breast conservation surgery. Br J Plast Surg 52:420–421PubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Hamdi M, Van Landuyt K, Blondeel P et al (2009) Autologous breast augmentation with the lateral intercostal artery perforator flap in massive weight loss patients. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 62:65–70PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Kaur N, Petit JY, Rietjens M et al (2005) Comparative study of surgical margins in oncoplastic surgery and quadrantectomy in breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 12:539–545PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Evans D, Lalloo F, Shenton A et al (2001) Uptake of screening and prevention in women at very high risk of breast cancer. Lancet 358:889–890PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Hartmann LC, Schaid DJ, Woods JE et al (1999) Efficacy of bilateral prophylactic mastectomy in women with a family history of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 340:77–84PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Spear SL, Schwarz KA, Ventuui ML et al (2008) Prophylactic mastectomy and reconstruction: clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction. Plast Reconstr Surg 122:1–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jean-Yves Petit
    • 1
  • Mario Rietjens
    • 1
  • Visnu Lohsiriwat
    • 1
    • 2
  • Piercarlo Rey
    • 1
  • Cristina Garusi
    • 1
  • Francesca De Lorenzi
    • 1
  • Stefano Martella
    • 1
  • Andrea Manconi
    • 1
  • Benedetta Barbieri
    • 1
  • Krishna B. Clough
    • 3
  1. 1.European Institute of Oncology-EIO, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery UnitMilanItaly
  2. 2.Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol UniversityBangkokThailand
  3. 3.Paris Breast Centre-L’Institut du SeinParisFrance

Personalised recommendations