Advertisement

World Journal of Surgery

, Volume 36, Issue 3, pp 638–644 | Cite as

Multivariable Analysis of Cholecystectomy after Gastrectomy: Laparoscopy is a Feasible Initial Approach even in the Presence of Common Bile Duct Stones or Acute Cholecystitis

  • Joohyun Kim
  • Jeong Nam Cho
  • Sun Hyung Joo
  • Bum Soo Kim
  • Sang Mok LeeEmail author
Article

Abstract

Background

When performing cholecystectomy after gastrectomy, we often encounter problems, such as adhesions, nutritional insufficiency, and bowel reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to identify the factors related to surgical outcome of these associated procedures, with emphasis on the use of a laparoscopic approach.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed data from 58 patients who had a history of cholecystectomy after gastrectomy. Differences between subgroups with respect to operation time, length of postoperative hospital stay, and complications were analyzed. To identify the factors related with outcomes of cholecystectomy after gastrectomy, we performed multivariable analysis with the following variables: common bile duct (CBD) exploration, laparoscopic surgery, gender, acute cholecystitis, history of stomach cancer, age, body mass index, period of surgery, and interval between cholecystectomy and gastrectomy.

Results

We found one case (2.9%) of open conversion. The CBD exploration was the most significant independent factor (adjusted odds ratio (OR), 45.15; 95% confidence interval (CI), 4.53–450.55) related to longer operation time. Acute cholecystitis also was a significant independent factor (adjusted OR, 14.66; 95% CI, 1.46–147.4). The laparoscopic approach was not related to operation time but was related to a shorter hospital stay (adjusted OR, 0.057; 95% CI, 0.004–0.74). Acute cholecystitis was independently related to the occurrence of complications (adjusted OR, 27.68; 95% CI, 1.15–666.24); however, CBD exploration and laparoscopic surgery were not. A lower BMI also was an independent predictor of the occurrence of complications (adjusted OR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.2–0.87).

Conclusions

The laparoscopic approach is feasible for cholecystectomy after gastrectomy, even in cases with CBD stones or acute cholecystitis. This approach does not appear to increase operation time or complication rate and was shown to decrease the length of postoperative hospital stay.

Keywords

Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Acute Cholecystitis Common Bile Duct Stone Percutaneous Transhepatic Biliary Drainage Acute Cholangitis 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Hauters P, De de Roden A, Pourbaix A (1988) Cholelithiasis: a serious complication after total gastrectomy. Br J Surg 75:899–900PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lorusso D, Misciagna G, Noviello M, Tarantino S (1988) Cholelithiasis after Billroth II gastric resection. Surgery 103:579–583PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rehnberg O, Haglund U (1985) Gallstone disease following antrectomy and gastroduodenostomy with or without vagotomy. Ann Surg 201(3):315–318PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hopman W, Jansen J, Lamers C (1984) Plasma cholecystokinin response to oral fat in patients with Billroth I and Billroth II gastrectomy. Ann Surg 199:276–280PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Inoue K, Fuchigami A, Hosotani R et al (1987) Release of cholecystokinin and gallbladder contraction before and after gastrectomy. Ann Surg 205:27–32PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yi S, Ohta T, Tsuchida A et al (2007) Surgical anatomy of innervation of the gallbladder in humans and Suncus murinus with special reference to morphological understanding of gallstone formation after gastrectomy. World J Gastroenterol 13:2066–2071PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fobi M, Lee H, Igwe D et al (2002) Prophylactic cholecystectomy with gastric bypass operation: incidence of gallbladder disease. Obes Surg 12:350–353PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nougou A, Suter M (2008) Almost routine prophylactic cholecystectomy during laparoscopic gastric bypass is safe. Obes Surg 18:535–539PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Farsi M, Bernini M, Bencini L et al (2009) The CHOLEGAS study: multicentric randomized, blinded, controlled trial of gastrectomy plus prophylactic cholecystectomy versus gastrectomy only, in adults submitted to gastric cancer surgery with curative intent. Trials 10:32PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Inoue K, Fuchigami A, Higashide S et al (1992) Gallbladder sludge and stone formation in relation to contractile function after gastrectomy. A prospective study. Ann Surg 215:19–26PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tsunoda K, Shirai Y, Wakai T et al (2004) Increased risk of cholelithiasis after esophagectomy. J Hepato-Biliary-Pan 11:319–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tachibana M, Kinugasa S, Yoshimura H et al (2003) Acute cholecystitis and cholelithiasis developed after esophagectomy. Can J Gastroenterol 17:175–178PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bae YS, Lee SM, Kim JH et al (2009) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with a history of upper abdominal surgery. J Korean Soc Endosc Laparosc Surg 12:108–112Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Karayiannakis A, Polychronidis A, Perente S et al (2004) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with previous upper or lower abdominal surgery. Surg Endosc 18:97–101PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kwon A (2001) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and choledocholithotomy in patients with a previous gastrectomy. J Am Coll Surgeons 193:614–619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sasaki A, Nakajima J, Nitta H et al (2008) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with a history of gastrectomy. Surg Today 38:790–794PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gillen S, Michalski C, Schuster T et al (2010) Simultaneous/incidental cholecystectomy during gastric/esophageal resection: systematic analysis of risks and benefits. World J Surg 34:1008–1014. doi: 10.1007/s00268-010-0444-1 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Quesada B, Kohan G, Roff H et al (2010) Management of gallstones and gallbladder disease in patients undergoing gastric bypass. World J Gastroenterol 16:2075–2079PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Poitou Bernert C, Ciangura C, Coupaye M et al (2007) Nutritional deficiency after gastric bypass: diagnosis, prevention and treatment. Diabetes Metab 33:13–24PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Karaliotas C, Sgourakis G, Goumas C et al (2008) Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration after failed endoscopic stone extraction. Surg Endosc 22:1826–1831PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ercan M, Bostanci EB, Ulas M et al (2009) Effects of previous abdominal surgery incision type on complications and conversion rate in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 19:373–378PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fraser SA, Sigman H (2009) Conversion in laparoscopic cholecystectomy after gastric resection: a 15-year review. Can J Surg 52:463–466PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Data from the national health insurance corporation. Available at: http://www.nhic.or.kr. Accessed 1 Dec 2010
  24. 24.
    Berthou J, Drouard F, Charbonneau P, Moussalier K (1998) Evaluation of laparoscopic management of common bile duct stones in 220 patients. Surg Endosc 12:16–22PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gigot J, Navez B, Etienne J et al (1997) A stratified intraoperative surgical strategy is mandatory during laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for common bile duct stones: lessons and limits from an initial experience of 92 patients. Surg Endosc 11:722–728PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tinoco R, Tinoco A, El-Kadre L et al (2008) Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. Ann Surg 247:674–679PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rhodes M, Sussman L, Cohen L, Lewis M (1998) Randomised trial of laparoscopic exploration of common bile duct versus postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography for common bile duct stones. Lancet 351:159–161PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Moore KB, Adrales GL, Mastrangelo MJ Jr (2004) Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. Curr Surg 61:294–296PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Phillips E, Liberman M, Carroll B et al (1995) Bile duct stones in the laparoscopic era: is preoperative sphincterotomy necessary? Arch Surg 130:880–886PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Tang C, Tsui K, Yang G et al (2008) Laparoscopic exploration of common bile duct in post-gastrectomy patients. Hepato-Gastroenterol 55:846–849Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Gurusamy K, Samraj K, Gluud C et al (2010) Meta analysis of randomized controlled trials on the safety and effectiveness of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Br J Surg 97:141–150PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wiseman J, Sharuk M, Singla A et al (2010) Surgical management of acute cholecystitis at a tertiary care center in the modern era. Arch Surg 145:439–444PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Jatzko G, Lisborg P, Pertl A, Stettner H (1995) Multivariate comparison of complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy and open cholecystectomy. Ann Surg 221(4):381–386PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kim H, Hyung W, Cho G et al (2010) Morbidity and mortality of laparoscopic gastrectomy versus open gastrectomy for gastric cancer: an interim report-a phase iii multicenter, prospective, randomized trial (KLASS Trial). Ann Surg 251(3):417–420PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joohyun Kim
    • 1
  • Jeong Nam Cho
    • 1
  • Sun Hyung Joo
    • 1
  • Bum Soo Kim
    • 1
  • Sang Mok Lee
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Surgery, School of MedicineKyung Hee UniversitySeoulKorea

Personalised recommendations