World Journal of Surgery

, Volume 36, Issue 3, pp 539–547 | Cite as

Involvement of Surgical Residents in the Management of Trauma Patients in the Emergency Room: Does the Presence of an Attending Physician Affect Outcomes?

  • Robert Cohen
  • Bruria Adini
  • Irina Radomislensky
  • Adi Givon
  • Avraham I. Rivkind
  • Kobi Peleg
Article

Abstract

Background

Few studies have investigated whether the presence or absence of attending physicians (AP) in the emergency department (ED) during the management of trauma patients by residents.

Methods

Six level 1 trauma center admissions for years 2006–2008 were analyzed to determine whether presence of an AP affected the time spent in the ED, post-ED disposition, and in-hospital mortality.

Results

Patient demographics differed in relation to the presence of APs (P < 0.01). Patients with ISS > 25 who died during hospitalization were more often managed when APs were present. Male patients, those <65, and patients with Injury Severity Score (ISS) > 16 were more often treated in the presence of an AP (P < 0.01). Penetrating, terror trauma, motor vehicle collision and assaults were more often managed in the presence APs. Presence of APs differed by hospital (P < 0.0001). Adjusted logistic regression revealed that patients spent less time in the ED, went directly to the operating room or the ICU for definitive care, if an AP was present.

Conclusions

Presence of an attending physician improved and focused patient triage, disposition decisions, and outcomes.

References

  1. 1.
    Accreditation council for graduate medical education. Common program requirements. http://www.acgme.org/acWebsite/dutyhours/dh_dutyhourscommonpr07012007.pdf. Accessed 12 June 2011
  2. 2.
    Statement on fundamental characteristics of surgical residency programs by the American College of Surgeons. Statements of the College (1988). Reprinted from Bulletin of the American College of Surgeons. Vol 73, No 8, pp 22–23. http://facs.org/fellows_info/statements/st-4.html. Accessed 09 June 2011
  3. 3.
    Jagsi R, Surendar R (2004) Regulation of junior doctors’ work hours: an analysis of British and American doctors’ experiences and attitudes. Soc Sci Med 28:2181–2191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Porter JM, Ursic C (2001) Trauma attending in the resuscitation room: Does it affect outcome? Am Surg 67:611–614PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Clarke DL, Gouveia J, Thomson SR et al (2008) Applying modern error theory to the problem of missed injuries in trauma. World J Surg 32:1176–1182. doi:10.1007/s00268-008-9543-7 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gwande AA, Zinner MJ, Studdert DM et al (2003) Analysis of errors reported by surgeons at three teaching hospitals. Surgery 133:614–621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fallon WF Jr, Wears RL, Tepas JJ 3rd (1993) Resident supervision in the operating room: Does this impact on outcome? J Trauma 35:556–560PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    British Orthopedic Association (2002) Education and training for SHOs: a snap-shot of the moment and recommendations for the future. British Orthopedic Association, LondonGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Thorne L, Burn S, Shaw S, Arvin B et al (2006) Neurosurgery trainees operative experience before and after introduction of the new deal for junior doctors. Br J Neurosurg 20:31–35PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bell RH et al (2009) Operative experience of residents in US general surgery programs: a gap between expectation and experience. Ann Surg 249:719–724PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gruen RL, Jurkovich GL, McIntyre LK et al (2006) Patterns of error contributing to trauma mortality. Lessons learned from 2594 deaths. Ann Surg 244:371–380PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ahmed JM, Tallon JM, Petrie DA (2007) Trauma management outcomes associated with non-surgeon versus surgeon trauma team leaders. Ann Emerg Med 50:7–12PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hawkins WJ, Moorthy KM, Tighe D et al (2007) With adequate supervision, the grade of the operating surgeon is not a determinant of outcome for patients undergoing urgent colorectal surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 89:760–765PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Theodorou D, Toutouzak K, Drimousis P et al (2009) Emergency management of trauma patients in Greece: preliminary report of a national study. Resuscitation 80:350–353PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yates DW, Woodford M, Hollis S (1992) Preliminary analysis of the care of injured patients in 33 British hospitals: First report of the United Kingdom major trauma care study. BMJ 305:737–740PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Demaria EJ, Kenney PR, Merrian MA et al (1984) Aggressive trauma care benefits the elderly. J Trauma 27:1200–1206Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bell CM, Redelmeier DA (2001) Mortality among patients admitted to hospitals on weekends as compared to weekdays. N Engl J Med 345:663–668PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cohen MM, Fath JA, Chung RS et al (1999) Impact of a dedicated trauma service on the quality and cost of care provided to injured patients at an urban teaching hospital. J Trauma 46:1114–1119PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Shojania KG, Fletcher KE, Saint S (2006) Graduate medical education and patient safety: a busy and occasionally hazardous intersection. Ann Intern Med 145:592–599PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Weisman C, Eidelman LA, Pizov R et al (2006) The Israeli anesthesiology physician workforce. IMAJ 8:255–260Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sampalis JS, Nathanson R, Vaillancourt J et al (2009) Assessment of mortality in older trauma patients sustaining injuries from falls or motor vehicle collisions treated in regional level 1 trauma centers. Ann Surg 249:488–495PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Farnan JM, Johnson JK, Meltzer DO et al (2008) Resident uncertainty in clinical decision making and impact on patient care: a qualitative study. Qual Saf Health Care 17:122–126PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hobgood C, Hevia A, Tamayo-Sarver JH, Weiner B et al (2005) The influence of the causes and contexts of medical errors on emergency medicine residents’ responses to their errors: an exploration. Acad Med 80:758–764PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Larkin GL, Kantor W, Zielenski JJ (2001) Doing unto others? Emergency medical residents’ willingness to be treated by moonlighting residents, and non-physician clinicians in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med 8:886–892PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Baldwin De WC, Daugherty SR, Ryan PM (2010) How residents view their clinical supervision: a reanalysis of classic national survey data. JGME 2:37–45Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bush RW (2010) Supervision in medical education: logical fallacies and clear choices. JGME 2:141–143Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Anastakis DJ, Regehr G, Reznick RK et al (1999) Assessment of technical skills transfer from bench the training model to the human model. Am J Surg 177:167–170PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert Cohen
    • 1
  • Bruria Adini
    • 2
  • Irina Radomislensky
    • 1
  • Adi Givon
    • 1
  • Avraham I. Rivkind
    • 3
  • Kobi Peleg
    • 1
  1. 1.Israel National Center for Trauma and Emergency Medicine ResearchGertner Institute for Epidemiology and Health Policy ResearchRamat GanIsrael
  2. 2.Ministry of Health, Emergency Medical Services and Disaster Management DivisionTel AvivIsrael
  3. 3.Department of SurgeryHadassah Medical OrganizationTel AvivIsrael

Personalised recommendations