World Journal of Surgery

, Volume 36, Issue 2, pp 255–259 | Cite as

Effects of Seat Belt Usage on Injury Pattern and Outcome of Vehicle Occupants After Road Traffic Collisions: Prospective Study

  • Fikri M. Abu-ZidanEmail author
  • Alaa K. Abbas
  • Ashraf F. Hefny
  • Hani O. Eid
  • Michal Grivna



Injury and death from road traffic collisions (RTCs) is a major health problem worldwide. The seat belt is the most important RTC safety innovation to reduce injury severity and death from RTCs. We aimed to study the effects of seat belt usage on injury patterns and outcomes of restrained vehicle occupants compared with unrestrained occupants after RTCs.


RTC trauma patients who were vehicle occupants and admitted to Al-Ain and Tawam Hospitals, or who died after arrival at the emergency departments were prospectively studied during the period of April 2006 to October 2007. Demography of patients, position in the vehicle, usage of seat belts, injury severity markers, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), hospital stay, need for surgery, injured body regions, and mortality were analyzed.


Of 783 vehicle occupants, 766 (98%) patients with known seat belt status were studied. Among them, the 631 (82.4%) who were unrestrained were significantly younger than the restrained patients (P < 0.0001). The Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) scores for the thorax, back, and lower extremity were significantly higher in unrestrained than in restrained patients (P = 0.001, P = 0.036, and P = 0.045 respectively). The GCS was significantly lower in unrestrained than in restrained patients (P = 0.006). More surgical operations were performed in the unrestrained patients (P = 0.027).


Seat belt usage reduces the severity of injury, hospital stay, and number of operations in injured patients. Seat belt compliance is low in our community. More legal enforcement of seat belt usage is mandatory to reduce the severity of injury caused by RTCs.


Injury Severity Score United Arab Emirate Seat Belt Abbreviate Injury Scale Vehicle Occupant 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



This study was supported by an Interdisciplinary UAE University grant (no. 02-07-8-1/4).

Conflict of interest

All of the authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.


  1. 1.
    Peden M, Scurfield R, Sleet D et al (2004) World Report on Road Traffic Injury Prevention 2004. World Health Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bandstra R., Meissner U, Warner CY (2011) Seat belt injuries in medical and statistical perspective. Paper 98-S6-W-25. Website: Accessed on February 12, 2011
  3. 3.
    FIA Foundation for the Automobile and Society (2009) Seat-belts and child restraints: a road safety manual for decision-makers and practitioners. London. Available at: Accessed on February 20, 2011
  4. 4.
    Cummings P (2002) Association of seat belt use with death: a comparison of estimates based on data from police and estimates based on data from trained crash investigators. Inj Prev 8:338–341PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bendak S (2005) Seat belt utilization in Saudi Arabia and its impact on road accident injuries. Accid Anal Prev 37:367–371PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Barss P, Al-Obthani M, Al-Hammadi A et al (2008) Prevalence and issues in non-use of safety belts and child restraints in a high-income developing country: lessons for the future. Traffic Inj Prev 9:256–263PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Munk MD, Carboneau DM, Hardan M et al (2008) Seatbelt use in Qatar in association with severe injuries and death in the prehospital setting. Prehosp Disaster Med 23:547–552PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Anonymous (2007) Annual Report, 2006. Preventive Medicine Sector, Ministry of Health, United Arab EmiratesGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Alain Hospital (2011) Accessed on May 9, 2011
  10. 10.
  11. 11.
    Burns A, Kummerer M, Macdonald NC (2010) Seat belt wearing in Scotland: a second study of compliance. Accessed on December 20, 2010
  12. 12.
    Evans L (1996) Safety-belt effectiveness: the influence of crash severity and selective recruitment. Accid Anal Prev 28:423–433PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cookson R, Richards D (2008) CCIS Topic report 9: who doesn’t buckle up in cars?…Topic-Report.[pdf] Publications 2008. Accessed on December 20, 2010
  14. 14.
    Sangowawa AO, Alagh BT, Ekanem SE et al (2010) An observational study of seatbelt use among vehicle occupants in Nigeria. Inj Prev 16:85–89PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Richards D, Cuerden R (2009) The relationship between speed and car driver injury severity. Transport Research Laboratory. Accessed on of December 5, 2010
  16. 16.
    NHTSA’s National Center for Statistics and Analysis (2010) Seat belt use in rear seats in 2007. Accessed on October 22, 2010
  17. 17.
    Hodson-Walker NJ (1970) The value of safety belts: a review. Can Med Assoc J 102:391–393PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Allen S, Zhu S, Sauter C et al (2006) A comprehensive statewide analysis of seatbelt non-use with injury and hospital admissions: new data, old problem. Acad Emerg Med 13:427–434PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jansson KA, Blomqvist P, Svedmark P et al (2010) Thoracolumbar vertebral fractures in Sweden: an analysis of 13, 496 patients admitted to hospital. Eur J Epidemiol 25:431–437PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Chong M, Sochor M, Ipaktchi K et al (2007) The interaction of ‘occupant factors’ on the lower extremity fractures in frontal collision of motor vehicle crashes based on a level I trauma center. J Trauma 62:720–729PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    MacLennan PA, McGwin G Jr, Metzger J et al (2004) Risk of injury for occupants of motor vehicle collisions from unbelted occupants. Inj Prev 10:363–367PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rutledge R, Lalor A, Oller D et al (1993) The cost of not wearing seat belts: a comparison of outcome in 3396 patients. Ann Surg 217:122–127PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bener A, Al Humoud SM, Price P et al (2007) The effect of seatbelt legislation on hospital admissions with road traffic injuries in an oil-rich, fast-developing country. Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot 14:103–137PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kopits E, Cropper M (2005) Traffic fatalities and economic growth. Accid Anal Prev 37:169–178PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kaplan BH, Cowley RA (1991) Seatbelt effectiveness and cost of noncompliance among drivers admitted to a trauma center. Am J Emerg Med 9:4–10PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Abbas AK, Hefny AF, Abu-Zidan FM (2011) Seatbelts and road traffic collision injuries. World J Emerg Surg 6:18PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Abbas AK, Hefny AF, Abu-Zidan FM (2011) Seatbelt compliance and mortality in the Gulf Cooperation Council countries in comparison with other high-income countries. Ann Saudi Med 31:347–350PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Gulf News (2011) New rules issued on installing children’s car seats. Available at: Accessed September 18, 2011
  29. 29.
    Abu-Zidan FM, Rizk DE (2005) Research in developing countries: problems and solutions. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 16:174–175PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fikri M. Abu-Zidan
    • 1
    Email author
  • Alaa K. Abbas
    • 1
  • Ashraf F. Hefny
    • 1
  • Hani O. Eid
    • 1
  • Michal Grivna
    • 2
  1. 1.Trauma Group, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health SciencesUAE UniversityAl-AinUAE
  2. 2.Trauma Group, Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health SciencesUAE UniversityAl-AinUAE

Personalised recommendations