Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Program Attenuates Stress and Accelerates Recovery in Patients After Radical Resection for Colorectal Cancer: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
- 2.3k Downloads
The aim of this trial was to compare the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) program with conventional perioperative management in patients who underwent radical resection for colorectal cancer.
A combination of evidence-based and consensus methodology was used to develop the ERAS protocol. Five hundred ninety-seven consecutive patients who underwent elective colorectal resection were randomized to either the ERAS (n = 299) or the control group (n = 298). Outcomes relating to nutrition and metabolism index, stress index, and recovery index were measured and recorded.
Demographic and operative data were similar between the two groups. Patients in the ERAS group showed improved nutritional status when compared with those of the control group. On postoperative day (POD) 1, the HOMA-IR (insulin resistance index) of the ERAS group was lower than that of the control group (p < 0.001). The cortisol level of the control group was elevated on both POD 1 (p = 0.007) and POD 5 (p = 0.002) compared to the preoperative level. However, the cortisol level of the ERAS group was not increased until POD 5 (p = 0.001). Reduced levels of TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, and IFN-γ in the ERAS group indicated less postoperative stress responses. In addition, ERAS was associated with accelerated recovery of gastrointestinal function. The postoperative length of stay (p < 0.001) and expense (p < 0.001) for the ERAS group were reduced in comparison to the controls. Twenty-eight cases in the control group and twenty-nine in the ERAS group suffered complications, which was not significantly different.
The ERAS protocol attenuates the surgical stress response and accelerates postoperative recovery without compromising patient safety.
KeywordsStress Index Mechanical Bowel Preparation Metabolism Index Traditional Chinese Herbal Medicine Cerebrovascular Complication
This project was sponsored by the Key Clinical Project from the Ministry of Health of China (2010–2012), the Surface Project from the Biomedical Department of Shanghai Science and Technology Commission in 2009 (09411967100), the National Natural Science Foundation of China in 2009 (30973416), and the Key Project of Shanghai Science and Technology Commission in 2008 (08431910200).
- 9.Brady M, Kinn S, Stuart P (2003) Preoperative fasting for adults to prevent perioperative complications. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (4):CD004423Google Scholar
- 11.Dechang Chen, Bingwen Jing, Jiandong Yand et al (1997) Basic and clinical research of rhubarb on gastrointestinal effects. Chin Emerg Treat Serious Crit Dis 9(7):411–413Google Scholar
- 12.Lijun Zhai, Xiuhua Ren (2009) Clinical observation and nursing of 52 Cases of intestinal inflation after gynecological operation treated acupoint injection. Int J Trad Chin Med 31(1):50–51Google Scholar
- 13.Huangye Tan, Hui Chen (2004) 156 cases of zusanli point injection of neostigmine to treat abdominal distension after abdominal surgery. Clin J Med 32(6):89–90Google Scholar
- 15.Guenaga KF, Matos D, Castro AA et al (2005) Mechanical bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (1):CD001544Google Scholar