World Journal of Surgery

, Volume 35, Issue 7, pp 1464–1468 | Cite as

The Evolution of Minimally Invasive Bariatric Surgery



The number of bariatric operations performed annually in the U.S. for the treatment of severe obesity [body mass index (BMI) ≥ 40 kg/m2] has increased tenfold since the mid 1990s, with approximately 220,000 operations performed in 2009. This article reviews the evolution of laparoscopic bariatric surgery over the last 20 years. The results of the most common procedures are analyzed and current and future trends described.


  1. 1.
    American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (June 2010) Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Fact Sheet. Available at Accessed January 2011
  2. 2.
    Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Curtin LR et al (2006) Prevalence of overweight and obesity in the United States, 1999–2004. JAMA 295:1549–1555PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sturm R (2007) Increases in morbid obesity in the USA: 2000–2005. Public Health 121(7):492–496PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    MacLean LD, Rhode B, Nohn CW (2000) Late outcome of isolated gastric bypass. Ann Surg 231:524–528PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bloosmston M, Zervos EE, Camps MA et al (1997) Outcome following bariatric surgery in super versus morbidly obese patients: does weight matter? Obes Surg 7:414–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Slater GH, Ren CJ, Siegel N et al (2004) Serum fat-soluble vitamin deficiency and abnormal calcium metabolism after malabsorptive bariatric surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 8:48–55PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Williamson DF, Serdula MK, Anda RF et al (1992) Weight loss attempts in adults: goals, duration, and rate of weight loss. Am J Public Health 82:1251–1257PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (1998) NHLBI obesity education initiative expert panel on the identification, evaluation, and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults. Clinical guidelines on the identification, evaluation, and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults, NIH Publication No. 98-4083. NIH, Bethesda, MDGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pournaras DJ, Osborne A, Hawkins SC et al (2010) Remission of type 2 diabetes after gastric bypass and banding: mechanisms and 2 year outcomes. Ann Surg 252(6):966–971PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kadera BE, Lum K, Grant J et al (2009) Remission of type 2 diabetes after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is associated with greater weight loss. Surg Obes Relat Dis 5(3):305–309PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rubino F, R’bibo SL, del Genio F et al (2010) Metabolic surgery: the role of the gastrointestinal tract in diabetes mellitus. Nat Rev Endocrinol 6(2):102–109PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wang Y, Zhang C (2009) Bariatric surgery to correct morbid obesity also ameliorates atherosclerosis in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Am J Biomed Sci 1(1):56–69PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Renard E (2009) Bariatric surgery in patients with late-stage type 2 diabetes: expected beneficial effects on risk ratio and outcomes. Diabetes Metab 35(6 Pt 2):564–568PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hamza N, Abbas MH, Darwish A et al (2010) Predictors of remission of type 2 diabetes mellitus after laparoscopic gastric banding and bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis 6:228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Alverdy JC, Prachand V, Flanagan B et al (2009) Bariatric surgery: a history of empiricism, a future in science. J Gastrointest Surg 13(3):465–477PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ward M, Prachand V (2009) Surgical treatment of obesity. Gastrointest Endosc 70(5):985–990PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Catona A, Gossenberg M, La Manna A et al (1993) Laparoscopic gastric banding: preliminary series. Obes Surg 3(2):207–209PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Belachew M, Legrand MJ, Vincent V (2001) History of Lap-Band: from dream to reality. Obes Surg 11(3):297–302PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Favretti F, Enzi G, Pizzirani E et al (1993) Adjustable Silicone Gastric Banding (ASGB): the Italian experience. Obes Surg 3(1):53–56PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Parikh MS, Fielding GA, Ren CJ (2005) U.S. experience with 749 laparoscopic adjustable gastric bands: intermediate outcomes. Surg Endosc 19:1631–1635PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gulkarov I, Wetterau M, Ren CJ et al (2008) Hiatal hernia repair at the initial laparoscopic adjustable gastric band operation reduces the need for reoperation. Surg Endosc 22(4):1035–1041PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wittgrove AC, Clark GW, Tremblay LJ (1994) Laparoscopic gastric bypass, Roux-en-Y: preliminary report of five cases. Obes Surg 4(4):353–357PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    de la Torre RA, Scott JS (1999) Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a totally intra-abdominal approach—technique and preliminary report. Obes Surg 9(5):492–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Schauer PR, Ikramuddin S, Gourash W et al (2000) Outcomes after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity. Ann Surg 232(4):515–529PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Higa KD, Boone KB, Ho T et al (2000) Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity: technique and preliminary results of our first 400 patients. Arch Surg 135(9):1029–1033 discussion 1033-1034PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Moser F, Horgan S (2004) Robotically assisted bariatric surgery. Am J Surg 188(4A Suppl):38S–44SPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Schauer P, Ikramuddin S, Hamad G et al (2003) The learning curve for laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is 100 cases. Surg Endosc 17(2):212–215PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Shikora SA, Kim JJ, Tarnoff ME et al (2005) Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: results and learning curve of a high-volume academic program. Arch Surg 140(4):362–367PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    McCarty TM, Arnold DT, Lamont JP et al (2005) Optimizing outcomes in bariatric surgery: outpatient laparoscopic gastric bypass. Ann Surg 242(4):494–498 discussion 498-501PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Longitudinal Assessment of Bariatric Surgery (LABS) Consortium, Flum DR, Belle SH, King WC et al (2009) Perioperative safety in the longitudinal assessment of bariatric surgery. N Engl J Med 361(5):445–454PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ren CJ, Patterson E, Gagner M (2000) Early results of laparoscopic biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch: a case series of 40 consecutive patients. Obes Surg 10(6):514–523 discussion 524PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Prachand VN, Davee RT, Alverdy JC (2006) Duodenal switch provides superior weight loss in the super-obese (BMI > or = 50 kg/m2) compared with gastric bypass. Ann Surg 244(4):611–619PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Prachand VN, Ward M, Alverdy JC (2010) Duodenal switch provides superior resolution of metabolic comorbidities independent of weight loss in the super-obese (BMI > or = 50 kg/m2) compared with gastric bypass. J Gastrointest Surg 14(2):211–220PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Søvik TT, Taha O, Aasheim ET et al (2010) Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic gastric bypass versus laparoscopic duodenal switch for superobesity. Br J Surg 97(2):160–166PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Fazylov RM, Savel RH, Horovitz JH et al (2005) Association of super-superobesity and male gender with elevated mortality in patients undergoing the duodenal switch procedure. Obes Surg 15:618–623PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Chu C, Gagner M, Quinn T et al (2002) Two-stage laparoscopic biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch: an alternative approach to super-super morbid obesity (abstract). 8th World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery, New York, March 13–16, 2002Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Dolan K, Hatzifotis M, Newbury L et al (2004) A clinical and nutritional comparison of biliopancreatic diversion with and without duodenal switch. Ann Surg 240:51–56PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Ziegler O, Sirveaux MA, Brunaud L et al (2009) Medical follow-up after bariatric surgery: nutritional and drug issues. General recommendations for the prevention and treatment of nutritional deficiencies. Diabetes Metab 35(6 Pt 2):544–557PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Heber D, Greenway FL, Kaplan LM, Endocrine Society et al (2010) Endocrine and nutritional management of the post-bariatric surgery patient: an Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 95(11):4823–4843PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Nguyen NT, Wolfe BM (2005) The physiologic effects of pneumoperitoneum in the morbidly obese. Ann Surg 241(2):219–226PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Sprung J, Whalley DG, Falcone T et al (2002) The impact of morbid obesity, pneumoperitoneum, and posture on respiratory system mechanics and oxygenation during laparoscopy. Anesth Analg 94(5):1345–1350PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Weeks JC, Nelson H, Gelber S, Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy (COST) Study Group et al (2002) Short-term quality-of-life outcomes following laparoscopic-assisted colectomy vs open colectomy for colon cancer: a randomized trial. JAMA 287(3):321–328PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Bilimoria KY, Bentrem DJ, Merkow RP et al (2008) Laparoscopic-assisted vs. open colectomy for cancer: comparison of short-term outcomes from 121 hospitals. J Gastrointest Surg 12(11):2001–2009PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Lacy AM, García-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S et al (2002) Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet 359(9325):2224–2229PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Smith RL, Bohl JK, McElearney ST et al (2004) Wound infection after elective colorectal resection. Ann Surg 239(5):599–605 discussion 605-607PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Olsen MA, Higham-Kessler J, Yokoe DS, Prevention Epicenter Program, Centers for Disease Control, Prevention et al (2009) Developing a risk stratification model for surgical site infection after abdominal hysterectomy. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 30(11):1077–1083PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Sugerman HJ, Kellum JM Jr, Reines HD et al (1996) Greater risk of incisional hernia with morbidly obese than steroid-dependent patients and low recurrence with prefascial polypropylene mesh. Am J Surg 171(1):80–84PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Nguyen NT, Lee SL, Goldman C et al (2001) Comparison of pulmonary function and postoperative pain after laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass: a randomized trial. J Am Coll Surg 192(4):469–476 discussion 476-477PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Joris JL, Hinque VL, Laurent PE et al (1998) Pulmonary function and pain after gastroplasty performed via laparotomy or laparoscopy in morbidly obese patients. Br J Anaesth 80(3):283–288PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Nguyen NT, Goldman C, Rosenquist CJ et al (2001) Laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass: a randomized study of outcomes, quality of life, and costs. Ann Surg 234(3):279–289 discussion 289-291PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Podnos YD, Jimenez JC, Wilson SE et al (2003) Complications after laparoscopic gastric bypass: a review of 3464 cases. Arch Surg 138(9):957–961PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Sekhar N, Torquati A, Youssef Y et al (2007) A comparison of 399 open and 568 laparoscopic gastric bypasses performed during a 4-year period. Surg Endosc 21(4):665–668PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Hutter MM, Randall S, Khuri SF et al (2006) Laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass for morbid obesity. Ann Surg 243:657–666PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Nguyen NT, Hinojosa M, Fayad C et al (2007) Use and outcomes of laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass at academic medical centers. J Am Coll Surg 205(2):248–255PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Encinosa WE, Bernard DM, Du D et al (2009) Recent improvements in bariatric surgery outcomes. Med Care 47(5):531–535PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for the Surgical Treatment of Obesity, Section of General Surgery, Department of SurgeryUniversity of Chicago Pritzker School of MedicineChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations