World Journal of Surgery

, Volume 35, Issue 4, pp 731–738 | Cite as

Changing Incidence of Acute Appendicitis and Nonspecific Abdominal Pain Between 1987 and 2007 in Finland

  • Imre Ilves
  • Hannu E. K. Paajanen
  • Karl-Heinz Herzig
  • Anne Fagerström
  • Pekka J. Miettinen



The incidence of acute appendicitis has declined in many countries. The aim of this study was to determine the trends in incidence of acute appendicitis (AA), appendectomies for AA, and nonspecific abdominal pain (NSAP) in Finland between 1987 and 2007.


We carried out a national register study. Demographic features were investigated. Diagnoses and procedures were classified according to the World Health Organization International Classification of Diseases. Data were analyzed for each of all five University Hospital districts (UHD) of Finland.


During the observation period of 21 years, 186,558 appendectomies were performed in Finland, of which 137,528 (74%) cases were reported as AA. The incidence of acute appendicitis declined 32%. The diagnostic accuracy improved from 73 to 82% and was higher in men. The accuracy rate among the male patients was stable throughout the two decades; among the female patients it rose from 63 to 75%. The incidence of appendicitis was highest in patients aged 15–24 years. The average incidence of NSAP was 34/10,000/year, and it was higher in older age groups. There was a large geographical disparity in the incidence of NSAP.


The incidence of acute appendicitis as well as the incidence of appendectomies is declining in Finland. The incidence of the NSAP has also been declining but we did not find any correlations between the incidences of the acute appendicitis and NSAP. There were clear geographical differences in the incidence of NSAP but not in the incidence of AA.


  1. 1.
    Sheridan WG, White AT, Havard T et al (1992) Non-specific abdominal pain: the resource implications. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 74:181–185PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Miettinen P, Pasanen P, Lahtinen J et al (1996) Acute abdominal pain in adults. Ann Chir Gynaecol 85:5–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Laurell H, Hansson LE, Gunnarsson U (2006) Diagnostic pitfalls and accuracy of diagnosis in acute abdominal pain. Scand J Gastroenterol 41:1126–1131PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fitz RH (1886) Perforating inflammation of the vermiform appendix with special reference to its early diagnosis and treatment. Am J Med Sci 92:321–346Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ditillo MF, Dziura JD, Rabinovici R (2006) Is it safe to delay appendectomy in adults with acute appendicitis? Ann Surg 244:656–660PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Miettinen P, Pasanen P, Lahtinen J et al (1995) The long-term outcome after negative appendix operation. Ann Chir Gynaecol 84:267–270PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Marudanayagam R, Williams GT, Rees BI (2006) Review of the pathological results of 2660 appendicectomy specimens. J Gastroenterol 41:745–749PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Korner H, Sondenaa K, Soreide JA et al (1997) Incidence of acute nonperforated and perforated appendicitis: age-specific and sex-specific analysis. World J Surg 21:313–317PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Al-Omran M, Mamdani M, McLeod RS (2003) Epidemiologic features of acute appendicitis in Ontario, Canada. Can J Surg 46:263–268PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Noudeh YJ, Sadigh N, Ahmadnia AY (2007) Epidemiologic features, seasonal variations and false positive rate of acute appendicitis in Shahr-e-Rey, Tehran. Int J Surg 5:95–98PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Walker AR, Segal I (1995) Appendicitis: an African perspective. J R Soc Med 88:616–619PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Langenscheidt P, Lang C, Puschel W et al (1999) High rates of appendicectomy in a developing country: an attempt to contribute to a more rational use of surgical resources. Eur J Surg 165:248–252PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Blomqvist P, Ljung H, Nyren O et al (1998) Appendectomy in Sweden 1989–1993 assessed by the Inpatient Registry. J Clin Epidemiol 51:859–865PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Williams NM, Jackson D, Everson NW et al (1998) Is the incidence of acute appendicitis really falling? Ann R Coll Surg Engl 80:122–124PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Korner H, Soreide JA, Pedersen EJ et al (2001) Stability in incidence of acute appendicitis. A population-based longitudinal study. Dig Surg 18:61–66PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kang JY, Hoare J, Majeed A et al (2003) Decline in admission rates for acute appendicitis in England. Br J Surg 90:1586–1592PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Morino M, Pellegrino L, Castagna E et al (2006) Acute nonspecific abdominal pain: a randomized, controlled trial comparing early laparoscopy versus clinical observation. Ann Surg 244:881–886 discussion 886-888PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Andersson R, Hugander A, Thulin A et al (1994) Indications for operation in suspected appendicitis and incidence of perforation. BMJ 308:107–110PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Temple CL, Huchcroft SA, Temple WJ (1995) The natural history of appendicitis in adults. A prospective study. Ann Surg 221:278–281PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hansson LE, Laurell H, Gunnarsson U (2008) Impact of time in the development of acute appendicitis. Dig Surg 25:394–399PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Migraine S, Atri M, Bret PM et al (1997) Spontaneously resolving acute appendicitis: clinical and sonographic documentation. Radiology 205:55–58PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cobben LP, de Van Otterloo AM, Puylaert JB (2000) Spontaneously resolving appendicitis: frequency and natural history in 60 patients. Radiology 215:349–352PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Broder J, Warshauer DM (2006) Increasing utilization of computed tomography in the adult emergency department, 2000–2005. Emerg Radiol 13:25–30PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lewis FR, Holcroft JW, Boey J et al (1975) Appendicitis. A critical review of diagnosis and treatment in 1, 000 cases. Arch Surg 110:677–684PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Berry J Jr, Malt RA (1984) Appendicitis near its centenary. Ann Surg 200:567–575PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Velanovich V, Satava R (1992) Balancing the normal appendectomy rate with the perforated appendicitis rate: implications for quality assurance. Am Surg 58:264–269PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Flum DR, Koepsell T (2002) The clinical and economic correlates of misdiagnosed appendicitis: nationwide analysis. Arch Surg 137:799–804 discussion 804PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Addiss DG, Shaffer N, Fowler BS et al (1990) The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in the United States. Am J Epidemiol 132:910–925PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Mohebbi HA, Mehrvarz S, Kashani MT et al (2008) Predicting negative appendectomy by using demographic, clinical, and laboratory parameters: a cross-sectional study. Int J Surg 6:115–118PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lintula H, Kokki H, Vanamo K (2001) Single-blind randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy in children. Br J Surg 88:510–514PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Towfigh S, Chen F, Mason R et al (2006) Laparoscopic appendectomy significantly reduces length of stay for perforated appendicitis. Surg Endosc 20:495–499PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sleem R, Fisher S, Gestring M et al (2009) Perforated appendicitis: is early laparoscopic appendectomy appropriate? Surgery 146:731–737 discussion 737-738PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kraemer M, Ohmann C, Leppert R et al (2000) Macroscopic assessment of the appendix at diagnostic laparoscopy is reliable. Surg Endosc 14:625–633PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Imre Ilves
    • 1
  • Hannu E. K. Paajanen
    • 1
    • 2
  • Karl-Heinz Herzig
    • 3
    • 4
  • Anne Fagerström
    • 1
  • Pekka J. Miettinen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryKuopio University HospitalKuopioFinland
  2. 2.Department of SurgeryMikkeli Central HospitalMikkeliFinland
  3. 3.Department of PhysiologyKuopio University HospitalKuopioFinland
  4. 4.Institute of Biomedicine, Division of Physiology and Biocenter of OuluUniversity of OuluOuluFinland

Personalised recommendations