Advertisement

World Journal of Surgery

, Volume 35, Issue 2, pp 297–301 | Cite as

Long-term Follow-up of Open and Laparoscopic Repair of Large Incisional Hernias

  • Anita Kurmann
  • Eva Visth
  • Daniel Candinas
  • Guido Beldi
Article

Abstract

Background

Long-term results after laparoscopic repair of large incisional hernias remain to be determined. The aim of this prospective study was to compare early and late complications between laparoscopic repair and open repair in patients with large incisional hernias.

Methods

Only patients with a hernia diameter of ≥5 cm were included in this study and were prospectively followed. We compared 56 patients who underwent open incisional hernia repair with 69 patients who underwent laparoscopic repair. Median follow-up in the laparoscopic group was 32.5 months (range 1–62 months) and in the open group 65 months (range 1–80 months).

Results

The demographic parameters were not significantly different between the two groups. However, the median hospital stay (6.0 days, range 1–23 days vs. 7.0 days, range 1–67 days; p = 0.014) and incidence of surgical site infections (SSIs) (5.8% vs. 26.8%; p = 0.001) were significantly lower in the laparoscopic group than in the open surgery group. Bulging of the implanted mesh was observed in 17.4% in the laparoscopic group and in 7.1% in the open group (p = NS). The recurrence rate was 18% in the open group and 16% in the laparoscopic group (p = NS). Multivariate analysis revealed that width of the hernia ≥10 cm, SSI, and BMI ≥30 kg/m2 were significant risk factors for hernia recurrence.

Conclusions

The incidence of SSIs was significantly lower after laparoscopic incisional hernia repair. At long-term follow-up, the recurrence rate was not different between the two techniques. Abdominal bulging is a specific problem associated with laparoscopic repair of large incisional hernias. Size of the hernia, BMI, and SSI are risk factors for hernia recurrence irrespective of the technique.

Keywords

Hernia Repair Open Group Incisional Hernia Laparoscopy Group Laparoscopic Repair 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Conflict of interest

Drs. Anita Kurmann, Eva Visth, Daniel Candinas, and Guido Beldi have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

References

  1. 1.
    Ellis H, Gajraj H, George CD (1983) Incisional hernias: when do they occur? Br J Surg 70:290–291CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hoer J, Lawong G, Klinge U et al (2002) [Factors influencing the development of incisional hernia: a retrospective study of 2,983 laparotomy patients over a period of 10 years]. Chirurg 73:474–480CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sorensen LT, Hemmingsen UB, Kirkeby LT et al (2005) Smoking is a risk factor for incisional hernia. Arch Surg 140:119–123CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kurmann A, Beldi G, Vorburger SA et al (2010) Laparoscopic incisional hernia repair is feasible and safe after liver transplantation. Surg Endosc 24:1451–1455CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Asencio F, Aguilo J, Peiro S et al (2009) Open randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open incisional hernia repair. Surg Endosc 23:1441–1448CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Barbaros U, Asoglu O, Seven R et al (2007) The comparison of laparoscopic and open ventral hernia repairs: a prospective randomized study. Hernia 11:51–56CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Misra MC, Bansal VK, Kulkarni MP et al (2006) Comparison of laparoscopic and open repair of incisional and primary ventral hernia: results of a prospective randomized study. Surg Endosc 20:1839–1845CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Olmi S, Scaini A, Cesana GC et al (2007) Laparoscopic versus open incisional hernia repair: an open randomized controlled study. Surg Endosc 21:555–559CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rives J, Pire JC, Flament JB et al (1985) [Treatment of large eventrations: new therapeutic indications apropos of 322 cases]. Chirurgie 111:215–225PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Beldi G, Ipaktchi R, Wagner M et al (2006) Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair is safe and cost effective. Surg Endosc 20:92–95CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Muysoms FE, Miserez M, Berrevoet F et al (2009) Classification of primary and incisional abdominal wall hernias. Hernia 13:407–414CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Anonymous (2004) National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System Report, data summary from January 1992 through June 2004, issued October 2004. Am J Infect Control 32:470–485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Anonymous (1986) Classification of chronic pain: descriptions of chronic pain syndromes and definitions of pain terms—prepared by the International Association for the Study of Pain, Subcommittee on Taxonomy. Pain Suppl 3:S1–226Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Forbes SS, Eskicioglu C, McLeod RS et al (2009) Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing open and laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair with mesh. Br J Surg 96:851–858CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Raftopoulos I, Vanuno D, Khorsand J et al (2003) Comparison of open and laparoscopic prosthetic repair of large ventral hernias. JSLS 7:227–232PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sajid MS, Bokhari SA, Mallick AS et al (2009) Laparoscopic versus open repair of incisional/ventral hernia: a meta-analysis. Am J Surg 197:64–72CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bernard C, Polliand C, Mutelica L et al (2007) Repair of giant incisional abdominal wall hernias using open intraperitoneal mesh. Hernia 11:315–320CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Beldi G, Wagner M, Bruegger LE et al (2010) Mesh shrinkage and pain in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: a randomized clinical trial comparing suture versus tack mesh fixation. Surg Endosc. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1246-0
  19. 19.
    Anthony T, Bergen PC, Kim LT et al (2000) Factors affecting recurrence following incisional herniorrhaphy. World J Surg 24:95–100; discussion 101CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Luijendijk RW, Lemmen MH, Hop WC et al (1997) Incisional hernia recurrence following “vest-over-pants” or vertical Mayo repair of primary hernias of the midline. World J Surg 21:62–65; discussion 66CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Agarwal BB, Agarwal S, Gupta MK et al (2008) Laparoscopic ventral hernia meshplasty with “double-breasted” fascial closure of hernial defect: a new technique. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 18:222–229CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Agarwal BB, Agarwal S, Mahajan KC (2009) Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: innovative anatomical closure, mesh insertion without 10-mm transmyofascial port, and atraumatic mesh fixation: a preliminary experience of a new technique. Surg Endosc 23:900–905CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anita Kurmann
    • 1
  • Eva Visth
    • 1
  • Daniel Candinas
    • 1
  • Guido Beldi
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Visceral Surgery and Medicine, Bern University HospitalUniversity of BernBernSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations