World Journal of Surgery

, Volume 34, Issue 12, pp 2813–2820 | Cite as

The Influence on Outcome of Indications for Antireflux Surgery

  • Urs Zingg
  • Lorelle Smith
  • Nicky Carney
  • David I. Watson
  • Glyn G. Jamieson



Patients with gastroesophageal reflux referred for fundoplication present with different symptom patterns. Previous studies have not analyzed the clinical outcome after fundoplication in patients stratified according to symptom patterns.


Five hundred eighteen patients undergoing laparoscopic fundoplication were stratified according to reflux symptom patterns: group 1, regurgitation; group 2, poorly controlled reflux; group 3, regurgitation and poor reflux control (combination of 1 and 2); and group 4, symptoms well controlled but patient does not want to continue taking medication. Clinical outcomes (heartburn control, dysphagia, satisfaction) were assessed prospectively using a standardized questionnaire at early (6 months to 2 years) and late (3–5 years) follow-up intervals.


Preoperative demographic data for the four groups were similar, except for age and the frequency of esophagitis (patients in group 4 were younger and more likely to have esophagitis). Perioperative morbidity was similar for the four groups. Eighty-seven percent of the overall study group was satisfied at early follow-up and 88% at late follow-up. Early clinical outcomes were similar for all subgroups, except dysphagia scores were higher in early follow-up in groups 1 and 3 (P = 0.001). At late clinical follow-up, there were no significant differences in clinical outcome between any groups.


At early follow-up (6 months to 2 years), patients who had reported regurgitation as the primary indication for surgery had a less favorable clinical outcome for the side effect dysphagia. However, at later follow-up, the type of preoperative reflux symptoms did not influence the clinical outcome.


  1. 1.
    Dent J, El-Serag HB, Wallander MA et al (2005) Epidemiology of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review. Gut 54:710–717CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lundell L, Miettinen P, Myrvold HE, Nordic Gerd Study Group et al (2009) Comparison of outcomes twelve years after antireflux surgery or omeprazole maintenance therapy for reflux esophagitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 12:1292–1298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Grant AM, Wileman SM, Ramsay CR et al (2008) Minimal access surgery compared with medical management for chronic gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: UK collaborative randomised trial. BMJ 337:a2664CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Epstein D, Bojke L, Sculpher MJ, REFLUX trial group (2009) Laparoscopic fundoplication compared with medical management for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: cost effectiveness study. BMJ 338:b2576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mahon D, Rhodes M, Decandt B et al (2005) Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication compared with proton-pump inhibitors for treatment of chronic gastro-oesophageal reflux. Br J Surg 92:695–699CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Spechler SJ, Lee E, Ahnen D et al (2001) Long-term outcome of medical and surgical therapies for gastroesophageal reflux disease. JAMA 285:2331–2338CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    DeMeester TR, Johnson LF, Joseph GJ et al (1976) Patterns of gastroesophageal reflux in health and disease. Ann Surg 184:459–470CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Saraswat VA, Dhiman RK, Mishra A et al (1994) Correlation of 24-h esophageal pH patterns with clinical features and endoscopy in gastroesophageal reflux disease. Dig Dis Sci 39:199–205CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Campos GM, Peters JH, DeMeester TR et al (1999) The pattern of esophageal acid exposure in gastroesophageal reflux disease influences the severity of disease. Arch Surg 134:882–888CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Meneghetti AT, Tedesco P, Galvani C et al (2008) Outcomes after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication are not influenced by the pattern of reflux. Dis Esophagus 21:165–169CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cowgill SM, Al-Saadi S, Villadolid D et al (2007) Upright, supine or bipositional reflux: Patterns of reflux do not affect outcome after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. Surg Endosc 21:2193–2198CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Broeders JA, Draaisma WA, de Vries DR et al (2009) The preoperative reflux pattern as prognostic indicator for long-term outcome after Nissen fundoplication. Am J Gastroenterol 104:1922–1930CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fuchs KH, Breithaupt W, Fein M et al (2005) Laparoscopic Nissen repair: indications, techniques and long-term benefits. Langenbecks Arch Surg 390:197–202CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Heidelbaugh JJ, Gill AS, van Harrison R et al (2008) Atypical presentations of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am Fam Physician 78:483–488PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dakkak M, Bennett JR (1992) A new dysphagia score with objective validation. J Clin Gastroenterol 14:99–100CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cai W, Watson DI, Lally CJ et al (2008) Ten-year clinical outcome of a prospective randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic Nissen versus anterior 180° partial fundoplication. Br J Surg 95:1501–1505CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wijnhoven BP, Lally CJ, Kelly JJ et al (2008) Use of antireflux medication after antireflux surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 12:510–517CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kamolz T, Granderath FA, Bammer T et al (2002) Dysphagia and quality of life after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication in patients with and without prosthetic reinforcement of the hiatal crura. Surg Endosc 16:572–577CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lundell L, Attwood S, Ell C et al (2008) Comparing laparoscopic antireflux surgery with esmoprazole in the management of patients with chronic gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a 3-year interim analysis of the LOTUS trial. Gut 57:1207–1213CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Watson DI, Jamieson GG, Devitt PG et al (2001) A prospective randomized trial of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication with anterior vs posterior hiatal repair. Arch Surg 136:745–751CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Salminen PT, Hiekkanen HI, Rantala AP et al (2007) Comparison of long-term outcome of laparoscopic and conventional Nissen fundoplication. A prospective randomized study with a 11-year follow-up. Ann Surg 246:201–206CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Baigrie RJ, Cullis SN, Ndhluni AJ et al (2005) Randomized double-blind trial of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication versus anterior partial fundoplication. Br J Surg 92:819–823CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Catarci M, Gintileschi P, Papi C et al (2004) Evidence-based appraisal of antireflux fundoplication. Ann Surg 239:325–337CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Limpert PA, Naunheim KS (2005) Partial versus complete fundoplication: is there a correct answer. Surg Clin North Am 85:399–410CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Booth MI, Stratford J, Jones L et al (2008) Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic total (Nissen) versus posterior partial (Toupet) fundoplication for gastro-oesophageal reflux based on preoperative oesophageal manometry. Br J Surg 95:57–63CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Urs Zingg
    • 1
  • Lorelle Smith
    • 1
  • Nicky Carney
    • 1
  • David I. Watson
    • 2
  • Glyn G. Jamieson
    • 1
  1. 1.Discipline of SurgeryUniversity of AdelaideAdelaideAustralia
  2. 2.Department of SurgeryFlinders UniversityBedford ParkAustralia

Personalised recommendations