Advertisement

World Journal of Surgery

, Volume 34, Issue 12, pp 3059–3064 | Cite as

Laparoscopic (TEP) Versus Lichtenstein Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Comparison of Quality-of-Life Outcomes

  • Eddie MyersEmail author
  • Katherine M. Browne
  • Dara O. Kavanagh
  • Michael Hurley
Article

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair has emerged as a viable alternative to the open procedure. To date, few studies have included validated measures of quality of life as end points. We compared quality-of-life outcomes following laparoscopic versus open repair of inguinal hernia.

Methods

All laparoscopic repairs were performed via the totally extraperitoneal route (TEP). All open procedures were Lichtenstein repairs (LR). Hernia repairs performed between January 1999 and December 2006 were included in the study. Data was recorded prospectively and each TEP repair was matched with a LR for analysis. The SF-36 form was used to assess quality of life. Statistical significance was determined using the two-sample Wilcoxon rank-sum (Mann-Whitney) test.

Results

Three hundred fourteen procedures were performed during the study period, 164 (52%) had a TEP repair and 150 (48%) had a LR. Ninety TEP repairs were matched with 90 LR. Recurrence rates were 3% following TEP repair and 2% following LR. There was a significant difference between the laparoscopic and open groups in terms of physical function (p = 0.0001), physical role (p < 0.0001), bodily pain (p = 0.0029), general health (p = 0.0025), and emotional role (p < 0.0001). There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of vitality (p = 0.2501), mental health (p = 0.08), or social functioning (p = 0.1677).

Conclusions

These data suggest that the TEP repair results in less postoperative pain, a quicker return to normal functional status, and improved quality-of-life outcomes with equivalent recurrence rates when compared to the LR.

Keywords

Hernia Repair Inguinal Hernia Open Repair Laparoscopic Repair Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Eklund AS, Montgomery AK, Rasmussen IC et al (2009) Low recurrence rate after laparoscopic (TEP) and open (Lichtenstein) inguinal hernia repair: a randomized, multicentre trial with 5 year follow up. Ann Surg 249(1):33–38CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    McCormack K, Scott NW, Go PM et al (2003) Laparoscopic techniques versus open techniques for inguinal hernia repair. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1:CD001785Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Takata MC, Duh QY (2008) Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Surg Clin North Am 88(1):157–178 xCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kato Y, Yamataka A, Miyano G et al (2005) Tissue adhesives for repairing inguinal hernia: a preliminary study. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 15(4):424–428CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hallen M, Bergenfelz A, Westerdahl J (2008) Laparoscopic extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair versus open mesh repair: long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. Surgery 143(3):313–317CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tantia O, Jain M, Khanna S et al (2009) Laparoscopic repair of recurrent groin hernia: results of a prospective study. Surg Endosc 23(4):734–738CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    The MRC Laparoscopic Groin Hernia Trial Group (1999) Laparoscopic versus open repair of groin hernia: a randomised comparison. Lancet 354(9174):185-190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wall ML, Cherian T, Lotz JC (2008) Laparoscopic hernia repair—the best option? Acta Chir Belg 108(2):186–191PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lamb AD, Robson AJ, Nixon SJ (2006) Recurrence after totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic repair: implications for operative technique and surgical training. Surgeon 4(5):299–307CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wright D, O’Dwyer PJ (1998) The learning curve for laparoscopic hernia repair. Semin Laparosc Surg 5(4):227–232PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Toy FK, Moskowitz M, Smoot RT Jr et al (1996) Results of a prospective multicenter trial evaluating the ePTFE peritoneal onlay laparoscopic inguinal hernioplasty. J Laparoendosc Surg 6(6):375–386PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Vidovic D, Kirac I, Glavan E et al (2007) Laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal hernia repair versus open Lichtenstein hernia repair: results and complications. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 17(5):585–590CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Butler RE, Burke R, Schneider JJ et al (2007) The economic impact of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: results of a double-blinded, prospective, randomized trial. Surg Endosc 21(3):387–390CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Neumayer L, Jonasson O, Fitzgibbons R et al (2003) Tension-free inguinal hernia repair: the design of a trial to compare open and laparoscopic surgical techniques. J Am Coll Surg 196(5):743–752CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Eklund A, Rudberg C, Smedberg S et al (2006) Short-term results of a randomized clinical trial comparing Lichtenstein open repair with totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 93(9):1060–1068CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Schmedt CG, Sauerland S, Bittner R (2005) Comparison of endoscopic procedures vs. Lichtenstein and other open mesh techniques for inguinal hernia repair: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Surg Endosc 19(2):188-199Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Taylor C, Layani L, Liew V et al (2008) Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair without mesh fixation: early results of a large randomised clinical trial. Surg Endosc 22(3):757–762CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gholghesaei M, Langeveld HR, Veldkamp R et al (2005) Costs and quality of life after endoscopic repair of inguinal hernia vs. open tension free repair: a review. Surg Endosc 19(6):816–821CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    McCormack K, Wake B, Perez J et al (2005) Laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernia repair: systematic review of effectiveness and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 9(14):1–203PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    de Jonge P, Lloyd A, Horsfall L et al (2008) The measurement of chronic pain and health-related quality of life following inguinal hernia repair: a review of the literature. Hernia 12:561–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Srsen D, Druzijanic N, Pogorolic Z et al (2008) Quality of life analysis after open and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair - retrospective study. Hepatogastroenterology 88:2112–2115Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eddie Myers
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Katherine M. Browne
    • 1
  • Dara O. Kavanagh
    • 1
  • Michael Hurley
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SurgerySt. Luke’s HospitalKilkennyIreland
  2. 2.Department of SurgeryBeaumont HospitalDublinIreland

Personalised recommendations