Advertisement

World Journal of Surgery

, Volume 34, Issue 5, pp 1128–1132 | Cite as

Anorectal Functional Results After Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery in Benign and Early Malignant Tumors

  • Zhiming Jin
  • Lu Yin
  • Lijun Xue
  • Moubin Lin
  • Qi Zheng
Article

Abstract

Background

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) has been suggested as a minimally invasive procedure of low morbidity for rectal villous adenomas and early anorectal adenocarcinomas. It has been used clinically in many areas outside of China for more than 20 years, but it began in mainland China only about 2 years ago. Some articles have reported excellent results with regard to morbidity and relapse rate with TEM, but there are no studies addressing its functional results in China until now. The aim of the present study was to analyze the effect of TEM on the manometric results.

Methods

Thirty-seven patients (16 females, 21 males) underwent TEM and were followed for more than 6 months. Anorectal manometry and an incontinence questionnaire were administered 1 week preoperatively, 2 weeks postoperatively, 3 and 6 months postoperatively.

Results

Of the 37 patients, 24 had villous adenomas and 13 had adenocarcinomas (11 uT1 and 2 uT2). Anorectal manometric values showed the mean anal resting pressure (ARP) decrease from 45 ± 6 mmHg to 29 ± 4 mmHg (p < 0.05) and the maximum tolerable volume (MTV) decrease from 175 ± 21 ml to 90 ± 15 ml (p < 0.05) at the third month after TEM. Maximal squeeze pressure (MSP) decreased from 181 ± 20 mmHg to 92 ± 14 mmHg (p < 0.05) at second week after operation and returned to normal value by the third postoperative month. The ARP and MTV were 45 ± 5 mmHg and 177 ± 21 ml, respectively, at 6 months after TEM, near the normal value (p > 0.05). Rectoanal inhibitory reflex (RAIR) was absent preoperatively in two patients; it was also absent in 10 patients 3 months postoperatively and in three patients 6 months postoperatively. Endosonography demonstrated internal anal sphincter (IAS) rupture in five patients, and full integrity of the external anal sphincter (EAS) in all patients. Of the five patients with IAS rupture, four had temporary incontinence to flatus normalized up to three postoperative months. Most patients had more times of stools per day and relative higher Wexner scores in a short period after TEM. All these patients were followed for 6–20 months with no incidence of relapse.

Conclusions

Anorectal function was preserved well after TEM, although some anorectal manometric parameters changed over time. Thus TEM is safe, in terms of anorectal function, for the cure of benign and early malignant tumors of the rectum.

Keywords

External Anal Sphincter Internal Anal Sphincter Anorectal Manometry Villous Adenoma Anorectal Function 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Büess G, Hutterer F, Theiss J et al (1984) A system for a transanal endoscopic rectum operation. Chirurg 55:677–680PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Büess G, Theiss R, Gunther M et al (1985) Endoscopic surgery in the rectum. Endoscopy 17:31–35CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Büess G, Kipfmuller K, Nlaruhn M et al (1987) Endoscopic microsurgery of rectal tumors. Endoscopy 19(suppl 1):38–42CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Büess G, Kipfmuller K, Ibald R et al (1988) Clinical results of transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Surg Endosc 2:245–250CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Büess G, Kipfmuller K, Hack D et al (1988) Technique of transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Surg Endosc 2:71–75CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mentges B, Buess G, Effinger G et al (1997) Indications and results of local treatment of rectal cancer. Br J Surg 84:348–351CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lee W, Lee D, Choi S et al (2003) Transanal endoscopic microsurgery and radical surgery for T1 and T2 rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 17:1283–1287CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Herman RM, Richter P, Walega P et al (2001) Anorectal sphincter function and rectal barostat study in patients following transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Int J Colorectal Dis 16:370–376CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kennedy ML, Lubowski DZ, King DW (2002) Transanal endoscopic microsurgery excision: is anorectal function compromised? Dis Colon Rectum 45:601–604CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kreis ME, Jehle EC, Haug V et al (1996) Functional results after transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Dis Colon Rectum 39:1116–1121CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Endreseth BH, Wibe A, Svinsas M (2005) Postoperative morbidity and recurrence after local excision of rectal adenomas and rectal cancer by transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Colorectal Dis 7:133–137CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Steele GD, Herndon JE, Bleday R et al (1999) Sphincter-sparing treatment for distal rectal adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 6:413–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mellgren A, Sirivongs P, Rothenberger DA (2000) Is local excision adequate therapy for early rectal cancer? Dis Colon Rectum 43:1064–1071CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Arribas D, Ramírez JM, Aguilella V (2000) Cirugía endoscópica transanal en los tumores de recto. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 92:526–530Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ramírez JM, Aguilella V, Arribas D et al (2002) Transanal endoscopic microsurgery should the defect be sutured? A randomized and controlled trial. Colorectal Dis 4:51–55CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    McArdle CS, Hole D, Hansell D et al (1990) Prospective study of colorectal cancer in the west of Scotland: ten year follow-up. Br J Surg 77:280–282CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mora López L, Serra Aracil J, Rebasa Cladera P et al (2007) Anorectal disorders in the immediate and late postoperative period after transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Cir Esp 82:285–289CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gracia Solanas JA, Ramírez Rodríguez JM, Aguilella Diago V et al (2006) A prospective study about functional and anatomic consequences of transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 98:234–237CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wang HS, Lin JK, Yang SH et al (2003) Prospective study of the functional results of transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Hepatogastroenterology 50:1376–1380PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Banerjee AK, Jehle EC, Kreis ME et al (1996) Prospective study of the proctographic and functional consequences of transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Br J Surg 83:211–213CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Duthie HL, Watts J (1965) Contributor of the external anal sphincter to the pressure zone in the anal canal. Gut 6:64–68CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ihre T (1974) Studies on anal function in continent and incontinent patients. Scand J Gastroenterol 9(suppl 25):1–64Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Frenckner B, von Euler B (1975) Influence of pudendal block on the function of the anal sphincter. Gut 16:482–489CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Yamana T, Oya M, Komatsu J et al (1999) Preoperative anal sphincter high pressure zone, maximum tolerable volume, and anal mucosal electro-sensitivity predict early postoperative defecatory function after low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 42:1145–1151CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lest AR, Penninckx F, Kerremans R (1989) The comparison of anal basal pressure. An in vivo and in vitro study in man. Int J Colorectal Dis 4:118–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gibbons CP, Trowbridge EA, Bannister JJ et al (1986) Role of anal cushions in maintaining continence. Lancet 1:886–887CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Zb AR, Jayne DG, Mathur D et al (2000) The importance of the internal anal sphincter (IAS) in maintaining continence: anatomical, physiological and pharmacological considerations. Colorectal Dis 2:193–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lund JN, Scholefield JH (1996) Aetiology and treatment of anal fissure. Br J Surg 83:1335–1344CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    MacDonald A, Smith A, McNeil AD et al (1992) Manual dilatation of the anus. Br J Surg 79:1381–1382CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Horgan PG, O’OConell PR, Shinkwin CA et al (1989) Effect of anterior resection on anal sphincter function. Br J Surg 76:783–786CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Yik-Hong HO, Tsang C, Tang CL et al (2000) Anal sphincter injuries from stapling instrument introduced transanally. Dis Colon Rectum 43:169–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Gowers WR (1887) The automatic action of sphincter ani. Proc R Soc Lond (Biol) 26:77–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Denny-Brown D, Robertson EG (1935) An investigation of the nervous control of defecation. Brain 58:256–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Duthie HL, Bennett RC (1963) The relation of sensation in the anal canal to the functional anal sphincter: a possible factor in anal continence. Gut 4:179–182CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Miller R, Bartolo DCC, Cervero F et al (1988) Anorectal sampling: a comparison of normal and incontinent patients. Br J Surg 75:44–47CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Lane RH, Parks AG (1977/1987) Function of the anal sphincters following colo-anal anastomosis. Br J Surg 64:596–599/Surgery 74:688–690Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    William NS, Price R, Johnston D (1980) Long term effect of sphincter in man. Br J Surg 67:203–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Suzuki H, Matsumoto K, Amano S et al (1980) Anorectal pressure and rectal compliance after low anterior resection. Br J Surg 67:655–657CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    O’Riordain MG, Molloy RG, Gillen P et al (1992) Rectoanal inhibitory reflex following low stapled anterior resection of rectum. Dis Colon Rectum 35:874–878CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Pedersen IK, Hint K, Olsen J (1986) Anorectal function after low anterior resection for carcinoma. Ann Surg 204:133–135CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Vaizey D, Caraperi E, Cahill J et al (1999) Prospective comparison of faecal incontinence grading systems. Gut 44:77–80PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zhiming Jin
    • 1
  • Lu Yin
    • 2
  • Lijun Xue
    • 2
  • Moubin Lin
    • 2
  • Qi Zheng
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of General Surgery, Shanghai Sixth People’s Hospital, School of MedicineShanghai Jiaotong UniversityShanghaiChina
  2. 2.Department of General Surgery, Shanghai Ruijin Hospital, School of MedicineShanghai Jiaotong UniversityShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations