Advertisement

World Journal of Surgery

, Volume 34, Issue 7, pp 1470–1474 | Cite as

Flexible Thoracoscopy may Facilitate Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Lobectomy

  • Peter B. LichtEmail author
  • Lars Ladegaard
Article

Abstract

Background

Video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy was introduced in the early 1990s but has not yet gained widespread acceptance. The VATS approach is still controversial although several studies suggest less postoperative morbidity compared with open thoracotomy. Nevertheless, some patients report long-lasting chest wall pain following VATS procedures, and, in theory, such pain may be related to intercostal nerve injury. The present study presents our experience with a commercially available flexible thoracoscope.

Methods

The study was designed as a case-control series of prospectively collected data to determine if performing VATS with a flexible thorascope could have benefits for both the patient and the surgeon.

Results

During the last 24 months 128 of 274 consecutive lobectomies (47%) were scheduled as VATS procedures with a new flexible high-definition thoracoscope. Six operations (4.6%) were converted to open surgery but only one case was converted during the last 12 months. There was no hospital mortality. The median duration of the operation was 105 min (range: 50–289 min), and the median postoperative hospital stay was 4 days (range: 2–27 days). At routine follow-up 2 weeks postoperatively all but three patients (2%) were considered pain free, which was significantly less than in 15 consecutive VATS lobectomies with rigid thoracoscopy performed prior to the introduction of flexible VATS (p = 0.02).

Conclusions

Video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy by flexible thoracoscopy is feasible and in our opinion easier and safer compared with rigid thoracoscopy. In our experience all parts of the operation are better visualized and many surgical pitfalls may be avoided. Even during early phases of setting up the VATS lobectomy program, the duration of the operation is comparable with open surgery, and postoperative pain is low, possibly because porthole angulation is minimized.

Keywords

Analgesic Medication Mediastinal Lymph Node Station Thoracoscopic Wedge Resection Standard Posterolateral Thoracotomy Lobectomy Procedure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material 1 (MPG 6348 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Roviaro G, Rebuffat C, Varoli F et al (1992) Videoendoscopic pulmonary lobectomy for cancer. Surg Laparosc Endosc 2:244–247PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kirby TJ, Rice TW (1993) Thoracoscopic lobectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 56:784–786PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lewis RJ (1993) The role of video-assisted thoracic surgery for carcinoma of the lung: wedge resection to lobectomy by simultaneous individual stapling. Ann Thorac Surg 56:762–768PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    McKenna R Jr (1995) VATS lobectomy with mediastinal lymph node sampling or dissection. Chest Surg Clin North Am 5:223–232Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Walker WS, Carnochan FM, Pugh GC (1993) Thoracoscopic pulmonary lobectomy. Early operative experience and preliminary clinical results. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 106:1111–1117PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    McKenna RJ Jr, Wolf RK, Brenner M et al (1998) Is lobectomy by video-assisted thoracic surgery an adequate cancer operation? Ann Thorac Surg 66:1903–1908CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Flores RM, Alam N (2008) Video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy (VATS), open thoracotomy, and the robot for lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 85:S710–S715CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nicastri DG, Wisnivesky JP, Litle VR et al (2008) Thoracoscopic lobectomy: report on safety, discharge independence, pain, and chemotherapy tolerance. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 135:642–647CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Shigemura N, Yim AP (2007) Variation in the approach to VATS lobectomy: effect on the evaluation of surgical morbidity following VATS lobectomy for the treatment of stage I non-small cell lung cancer. Thorac Surg Clin 17:233–239CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Reed MF, Lucia MW, Starnes SL et al (2008) Thoracoscopic lobectomy: introduction of a new technique into a thoracic surgery training program. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 136:376–381CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Roviaro G, Varoli F, Vergani C et al (2004) Long-term survival after videothoracoscopic lobectomy for stage I lung cancer. Chest 126:725–732CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    McKenna RJ Jr, Fischel RJ, Wolf R et al (1998) Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) lobectomy for bronchogenic carcinoma. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 10:321–325PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mahtabifard A, DeArmond DT, Fuller CB et al (2007) Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy for stage I lung cancer. Thorac Surg Clin 17:223–231CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Walker WS, Codispoti M, Soon SY et al (2003) Long-term outcomes following VATS lobectomy for non-small cell bronchogenic carcinoma. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 23:397–402CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kaseda S, Aoki T, Hangai N et al (2000) Better pulmonary function and prognosis with video-assisted thoracic surgery than with thoracotomy. Ann Thorac Surg 70:1644–1646CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ohtsuka T, Nomori H, Horio H et al (2004) Is major pulmonary resection by video-assisted thoracic surgery an adequate procedure in clinical stage I lung cancer? Chest 125:1742–1746CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    West D, Rashid S, Dunning J (2007) Does video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy produce equal cancer clearance compared to open lobectomy for non-small cell carcinoma of the lung? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 6:110–116CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Iwasaki A, Shirakusa T, Shiraishi T et al (2004) Results of video-assisted thoracic surgery for stage I/II non-small cell lung cancer. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 26:158–164CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Shigemura N, Akashi A, Funaki S et al (2006) Long-term outcomes after a variety of video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy approaches for clinical stage IA lung cancer: a multi-institutional study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 132:507–512CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kirby TJ, Mack MJ, Landreneau RJ et al (1995) Lobectomy–video-assisted thoracic surgery versus muscle-sparing thoracotomy. A randomized trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 109:997–1001CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sugi K, Kaneda Y, Esato K (2000) Video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy achieves a satisfactory long-term prognosis in patients with clinical stage IA lung cancer. World J Surg 24:27–30CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Craig SR, Leaver HA, Yap PL et al (2001) Acute phase responses following minimal access and conventional thoracic surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 20:455–463CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    McKenna RJ Jr, Houck W, Fuller CB (2006) Video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy: experience with 1, 100 cases. Ann Thorac Surg 81:421–425CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mahtabifard A, Fuller CB, McKenna RJ Jr (2008) Video-assisted thoracic surgery sleeve lobectomy: a case series. Ann Thorac Surg 85:S729–S732CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hazelrigg SR, Cetindag IB, Fullerton J (2002) Acute and chronic pain syndromes after thoracic surgery. Surg Clin North Am 82:849–865CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Stammberger U, Steinacher C, Hillinger S et al (2000) Early and long-term complaints following video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: evaluation in 173 patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 18:7–11CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Cardiothoracic SurgeryOdense University HospitalOdenseDenmark

Personalised recommendations