World Journal of Surgery

, Volume 34, Issue 7, pp 1663–1668 | Cite as

Effect of Amnion-Derived Cellular Cytokine Solution on Healing of Experimental Partial-Thickness Burns

  • Wyatt G. Payne
  • Thomas L. Wachtel
  • Charlotte A. Smith
  • M. Georgina Uberti
  • Francis Ko
  • Martin C. RobsonEmail author



Amnion-derived multipotent progenitor (AMP) cells, unlike most stem cells, have been demonstrated to be nontumorigenic and nonimmunogenic. Amnion-derived cellular cytokine solution (ACCS), a secreted product of AMP cells, is a cocktail of cytokines existing at physiological levels and has been used to accelerate epithelialization of experimental partial-thickness burns.


Using modifications of Zawacki’s guinea pig partial-thickness scald burn model, a total of 65 animals were treated with ACCS, ACCS + AMP cells, unconditioned medium (UCM) + AMP cells, or either UCM alone or saline as controls. Dosage times ranged from every other day to once a week. Percent epithelialization was serially determined from acetate wound tracings. Histology was performed on wound biopsies.


ACCS, UCM + AMP cells, and ACCS + AMP cells improved epithelialization compared with the two control groups (P < 0.05). When ACCS was delivered more frequently, statistically significant more rapid epithelialization occurred (P < 0.05). By day 7, all groups treated with ACCS had reached at least 90% epithelialization, whereas control groups were only 20–40% epithelialized (P < 0.05). Histology showed excellent regeneration of the epidermis with rete ridge formation. Hair growth occurred in ACCS-treated animals but not in the control group.


Amnion-derived cellular cytokine solution accelerates the healing of experimental partial-thickness burns. Based on these findings, a multicenter clinical trial is underway.


Hair Growth Hair Cycle BMDP Statistical Software Animal Component Skin Graft Donor Site 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



This material is the result of work supported with resources and the use of facilities at the Bay Pines VA Healthcare System, Bay Pines, Florida. The authors acknowledge the work of Deepak N. Naidu, MD and R. Emerick Salas, MD, who served as postdoctoral research fellows and participated in the conduct of the two experiments, providing surgical care and treatment to the animals. The work was supported in part by a grant from the Department of Defense (USAMRAA 06153010).


  1. 1.
    Xing L, Franz MG, Marcelo CL et al (2007) Amnion-derived multipotent progenitor cells increase gain of incisional breaking strength and decrease incidence and severity of acute wound failure. J Burns Wounds 7:39–52Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Franz MG, Payne WG, Xing L et al (2008) The use of amnion-derived cellular cytokine solution to improve healing in acute and chronic wound models. ePlasty 8:188–199Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Uberti MG, Ko F, Pierpont YN et al (2009) The use of amnion-derived cellular cytokine solution (ACCS) in accelerating closure of interstices in explanted meshed human skin grafts. ePlasty 9:113–119Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Banas RA, Trumpower C, Bentlejewski C et al (2008) Immunogenicity and immunomodulatory effects of amnion-derived multipotent progenitor cells. Hum Immunol 69:321–328CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Steed DL, Trumpower C, Duffy D et al (2008) Amnion-derived cellular cytokine solution: a physiological combination of cytokines for wound healing. ePlasty 8:157–165Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Saranto JR, Rubayi S, Zawacki BE (1983) Blisters, cooling, antithromboxanes, and healing in experimental zone-of-stasis burns. J Trauma 23:927–933CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zawacki BE (1974) Reversal of capillary stasis and prevention of necrosis in burns. Ann Surg 180:98–102CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    DelBeccaro EJ, Robson MC, Heggers JP et al (1980) The use of specific thromboxane inhibitors to preserve the dermal microcirculation after burning. Surgery 87:137–141PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Robson MC, DelBeccaro EJ, Heggers JP et al (1980) Increasing dermal perfusion after burning by decreasing thromboxane production. J Trauma 20:722–725CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hammond SA, Tsonis C, Sellins K et al (2000) Transcutaneous immunization of domestic animals: opportunities and challenges. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 43:45–55CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hokanson JA, Hayward PG, Carney DH et al (1992) A mathematical model for the analysis of experimental wound healing data. Wounds 3:213–220Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Han SK, Toon TH, Lee DG et al (2005) Potential of human bone marrow stromal cells to accelerate wound healing in vitro. Ann Plast Surg 55:414–419CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dvonch WM, Murphey RJ, Matsuoka J et al (1992) Changes in growth factor levels in human wound fluid. Surgery 112:18–23PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wyatt G. Payne
    • 1
    • 2
    • 5
  • Thomas L. Wachtel
    • 3
  • Charlotte A. Smith
    • 3
  • M. Georgina Uberti
    • 1
  • Francis Ko
    • 1
  • Martin C. Robson
    • 2
    • 4
    Email author
  1. 1.Institute for Tissue Regeneration, Repair, and Rehabilitation, Bay Pines Veterans Healthcare SystemBay PinesUSA
  2. 2.Division of Plastic SurgeryUniversity of South FloridaTampaUSA
  3. 3.Stemnion, Inc.PittsburghUSA
  4. 4.MacatawaUSA
  5. 5.Surgical Service (112)Bay Pines VA Healthcare SystemBay PinesUSA

Personalised recommendations