Advertisement

World Journal of Surgery

, Volume 33, Issue 12, pp 2683–2687 | Cite as

Hybrid Hand-Assisted Colectomy for Transverse Colon Cancer: A Useful Technique for Non-Expert Laparoscopic Surgeons

  • Yuji TakakuraEmail author
  • Masazumi Okajima
  • Masanori Yoshimitsu
  • Takao Hinoi
  • Satoshi Ikeda
  • Hideki Ohdan
Article

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic assisted colectomy (LAC) is commonly performed, but LAC for transverse colon cancer is a complex procedure, even in the hands of experts. In particular, laparoscopic take-down of the splenic and/or the hepatic flexure and dissection of the lymph nodes around the middle colic vessels are extremely complicated maneuvers compared to the complexity of these procedures during open surgery. We herein describe a simple and less-invasive technique for performing hybrid hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy (hybrid-HALC). This procedure combines the established convenient and safe techniques of open surgery with the less invasive hand-assisted laparoscopic approach.

Methods

From 2000 to 2007, 22 patients with transverse colon cancer underwent hybrid-HALC at our facility. Short-term outcomes of hybrid-HALC were retrospectively compared with those of LAC over the same period and with those of conventional open surgery as a historical control.

Results

The intraoperative and postoperative data indicating the short-term outcomes of the hybrid-HALC group were better than those of conventional open surgery and similar to those of the LAC group; the mean operative time for hybrid-HALC was 40 min shorter than that for LAC. Furthermore, the reduction in the operative time in the hybrid-HALC group was more prominent in the case of non-expert surgeons.

Conclusions

We conclude that hybrid-HALC for transverse colon cancer is a feasible, convenient, and less-invasive technique, and that it is a useful alternative, especially for non-expert laparoscopic surgeons.

Keywords

Estimate Blood Loss Splenic Flexure Great Omentum Transverse Colon Cancer Laparoscopic Assisted Colectomy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    The Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350:2050–2059CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S et al (2002) Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet 359:2224–2229CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC et al (2005) Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 6:477–484CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hasegawa H, Kabeshima Y, Watanabe M et al (2003) Randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open colectomy for advanced colorectal cancer. Surg Endosc 17:636–640CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    http://www.asas.or.jp/jses/. Accessed 8 Oct 2009
  6. 6.
    Jacobs M, Verdeja JC, Goldstein HS (1991) Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy). Surg Laparosc Endosc 1:144–150PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Darzi A (2000) Hand-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 14:999–1004CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kang JC, Chung MH, Chao PC et al (2004) Hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy vs open colectomy: a prospective randomized study. Surg Endosc 18:577–581CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nakagoe T, Sawai T, Tsuji T et al (2001) Use of minilaparotomy in the treatment of colonic cancer. Br J Surg 88:831–836CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Horiuchi T, Tanishima H, Tamagawa K (2007) Randomized, controlled investigation of the anti-infective properties of the Alexis retractor/protector of incision sites. J Trauma 62:212–215CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schlachta CM, Mamazza J, Poulin EC (2007) Are transverse colon cancers suitable for laparoscopic resection? Surg Endosc 21:396–399CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yuji Takakura
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Masazumi Okajima
    • 1
  • Masanori Yoshimitsu
    • 2
  • Takao Hinoi
    • 1
  • Satoshi Ikeda
    • 1
  • Hideki Ohdan
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Endoscopic Surgery and Surgical ScienceGraduate School of Biomedical Science, Hiroshima UniversityHiroshimaJapan
  2. 2.Department of Surgery, Division of Frontier Medical Science, Programs for Biomedical ResearchGraduate School of Biomedical Science, Hiroshima UniversityHiroshimaJapan

Personalised recommendations