World Journal of Surgery

, 33:2360 | Cite as

Systematic Video Game Training in Surgical Novices Improves Performance in Virtual Reality Endoscopic Surgical Simulators: A Prospective Randomized Study

  • Marcus Kolga Schlickum
  • Leif Hedman
  • Lars Enochsson
  • Ann Kjellin
  • Li Felländer-Tsai



Previous studies have shown a correlation between previous video game experience and performance in minimally invasive surgical simulators. The hypothesis is that systematic video game training with high visual-spatial demands and visual similarity to endoscopy would show a transfer effect on performance in virtual reality endoscopic surgical simulation.


A prospective randomized study was performed. Thirty surgical novices were matched and randomized to five weeks of systematic video game training in either a first-person shooter game (Half Life) with high visual-spatial demands and visual similarities to endoscopy or a video game with mainly cognitive demands (Chessmaster). A matched control group (n = 10) performed no video game training during five weeks. Performance in two virtual reality endoscopic surgical simulators (MIST-VR and GI Mentor II) was measured pre- and post-training. Before simulator training we also controlled for students’ visual-spatial ability, visual working memory, age, and previous video game experience.


The group training with Half Life showed significant improvement in two GI Mentor II variables and the MIST-VR task MD level medium. The group training with Chessmaster only showed an improvement in the MIST-VR task. No effect was observed in the control group. As recently shown in other studies, current and previous video game experience was important for simulator performance.


Systematic video game training improved surgical performance in advanced virtual reality endoscopic simulators. The transfer effect increased when increasing visual similarity. The performance in intense, visual-spatially challenging video games might be a predictive factor for the outcome in surgical simulation.


  1. 1.
    Grantcharov TP (2008) Is virtual reality simulation an effective training method in surgery? Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol 5:232–233PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Seymour NE, Gallagher AG, Roman SA et al (2002) Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study. Ann Surg 236:458–463 discussion 463–454PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ahlberg G, Enochsson L, Gallagher AG et al (2007) Proficiency-based virtual reality training significantly reduces the error rate for residents during their first 10 laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Am J Surg 193:797–804PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    The Entertainment Software Association. Industry facts. Accessed 10-06, 2008
  5. 5.
    Enochsson L, Isaksson B, Tour R et al (2004) Visuospatial skills and computer game experience influence the performance of virtual endoscopy. J Gastrointest Surg 8:876–882PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rosser JC Jr, Lynch PJ, Cuddihy L et al (2007) The impact of video games on training surgeons in the 21st century. Arch Surg 142:181–186PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rosenberg BH, Landsittel D, Averch TD (2005) Can video games be used to predict or improve laparoscopic skills? J Endourol 19:372–376PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kolga Schlickum M, Hedman L, Enochsson L et al (2008) Transfer of systematic computer game training in surgical novices on performance in virtual reality image guided surgical simulators. Stud Health Technol Inform 132:210–215PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chessmaster, 10th edition [computer program] (2004) Montreuil-sous-Bois, France, UbisoftGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Half-Life [computer program] (1998) Los Angeles, Sierra On-LineGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hedman L, Klingberg T, Kjellin A et al (2006) Working memory and image guided surgical simulation. Stud Health Technol Inform 119:188–193PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wanzel KR, Hamstra SJ, Anastakis DJ et al (2002) Effect of visual-spatial ability on learning of spatially-complex surgical skills. Lancet 359:230–231PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Felländer-Tsai L, Kjellin A, Wredmark T et al (2004) Basic accreditation for invasive image guided intervention. J Inform Techn Healthcare 3:165–173Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gallagher AG, Lederman AB, McGlade K et al (2004) Discriminative validity of the Minimally Invasive Surgical Trainer in Virtual Reality (MIST-VR) using criteria levels based on expert performance. Surg Endosc 18:660–665PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hedman L, Strom P, Andersson P et al (2006) High-level visual-spatial ability for novices correlates with performance in a visual-spatial complex surgical simulator task. Surg Endosc 20:1275–1280PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Peters M, Laeng B, Latham K et al (2000) A redrawn Vanderberg and Kuse mental rotation test: different versions and factors that affect performance. Brain Cognition 28:39–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hedman L, Klingberg T, Enochsson L et al (2007) Visual working memory influences the performance in virtual image-guided surgical intervention. Surg Endosc 21:2044–2050PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    WAIS-III (2003) San Antonio, TX, Pearson AssesmentGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Daniel WW (1995) Biostatistics: A Foundation for Analysis in the Health Sciences, 6th edn. John Wiley & Sons, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    The SAS system 9.1 [computer program] (2003) Cary, NC, SAS Institute IncGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sigma Stat 3.5 [computer program] (2005) San Jose, CA, SystatGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Klingberg T, Fernell E, Olesen PJ et al (2005) Computerized training of working memory in children with ADHD—a randomized, controlled trial. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatr 44:177–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Buonomano DV, Merzenich MM (1998) Cortical plasticity: from synapses to maps. Annu Rev Neurosci 21:149–186PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marcus Kolga Schlickum
    • 1
    • 2
  • Leif Hedman
    • 2
    • 3
  • Lars Enochsson
    • 1
    • 2
  • Ann Kjellin
    • 1
    • 2
  • Li Felländer-Tsai
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Clinical Science Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC)Karolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
  2. 2.Center for Advanced Medical SimulationKarolinska University HospitalStockholmSweden
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyUmeå UniversityUmeåSweden

Personalised recommendations