World Journal of Surgery

, Volume 33, Issue 5, pp 918–922 | Cite as

Value of Laparoscopic Appendectomy in the Elderly Patient

  • Boris Kirshtein
  • Zvi Howard Perry
  • Solly Mizrahi
  • Leonid Lantsberg
Article

Abstract

Background

Acute appendicitis (AA) in elderly patients (60 years of age and older) is a challenging problem associated with significant morbidity and mortality when perforation is present. We hypothesized that laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) would enable an earlier correct diagnosis and have advantages in elderly patients.

Methods

We performed a retrospective review of patients who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy for suspected AA. Data of elderly patients were compared to data of younger patients (18 to <60 years of age).

Results

Fifty-four LA were performed in elderly patients and 423 in younger patients. Patients over the age of 60 years had more co-morbidities and required more frequent use of anticoagulants. Preoperative imaging (ultrasound or computerized tomography) was significantly more frequent in elderly patients (36% versus 15%), and was associated with a higher rate of confirmation of acute appendicitis (78% versus 55%), which allowed a decrease in the rate of negative surgical explorations to 4.1% in elderly patients compared to 10.2% in younger patients. Complicated appendicitis and conversions were more frequent in the elderly patients. This resulted in prolonged operative time and longer hospital stay for this group. The overall complication rate was equivalent in the two groups, without differences in the occurrence either of infectious complications or of complications related to surgical site. There were no deaths following appendectomy in our series.

Conclusions

Laparoscopic appendectomy is safe in the elderly population and is not associated with any increase in morbidity. The high incidence of complicated appendicitis in elderly patients affects operative time and length of hospital stay following laparoscopic appendectomy, and it can also lead to an increased rate of conversion to an open procedure. Use of preoperative abdominal computerized tomography scan is mandatory in elderly patients to provide an early diagnosis and to decrease unnecessary surgical exploration when acute appendicitis is suspected.

References

  1. 1.
    Fagbohun CF, Toy EC, Baker B (1999) The evaluation of acute abdominal pain in the elderly patient. Primary Care Update Ob/Gyn 181–185Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sheu BF, Chiu TF, Chen JC et al (2007) Risk factors associated with perforated appendicitis in elderly patients presenting with signs and symptoms of acute appendicitis. Aust N Z J Surg 77:662–666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Franz MG, Norman J, Fabri PJ (1995) Increased morbidity of appendicitis with advancing age. Am Surg 61:40–44PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yamini D, Vargas H, Bongard F et al (1998) Perforated appendicitis: is it truly a surgical urgency? Am Surg 64:970–975PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Storm-Dickerson TL, Horattas MC (2003) What have we learned over the past 20 years about appendicitis in the elderly? Am J Surg 185:198–201PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lunca S, Bouras G, Romedea NS (2004) Acute appendicitis in the elderly patient: diagnostic problems, prognostic factors and outcomes. Rom J Gastroenterol 13:299–303PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lee SL, Walsh AJ, Ho HS (2001) Computed tomography and ultrasonography do not improve and may delay the diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis. Arch Surg 136:556–562PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fuchs JR, Schlamberg JS, Shortsleeve MJ et al (2002) Impact of abdominal CT imaging on the management of appendicitis: an update. J Surg Res 106:131–136PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hui TT, Major KM, Avital I et al (2002) Outcome of elderly patients with appendicitis: effect of computed tomography and laparoscopy. Arch Surg 137:995–998, discussion 999–1000PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Golub R, Siddiqui F, Pohl D (1998) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a metaanalysis. J Am Coll Surg 186:545–553PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chung RS, Rowland DY, Li P et al (1999) A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy. Am J Surg 177:250–256PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Paik PS, Towson JA, Anthone GJ et al (1997) Intra-abdominal abscesses following laparoscopic and open appendectomies. J Gastrointest Surg 1:188–193PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Krisher SL, Browne A, Dibbins A et al (2001) Intra-abdominal abscess after laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis. Arch Surg 136:438–441PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Von Titte SN, McCabe CJ, Ottinger LW (1996) Delayed appendectomy for appendicitis: causes and consequences. Am J Emerg Med 14:620–622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kim K, Lee CC, Song KJ et al (2008) The impact of helical computed tomography on the negative appendectomy rate: a multi-center comparison. J Emerg Med 34:3–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gwynn LK (2001) The diagnosis of acute appendicitis: clinical assessment versus computed tomography evaluation. J Emerg Med 21:119–123PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Horton MD, Counter SF, Florence MG et al (2000) A prospective trial of computed tomography and ultrasonography for diagnosing appendicitis in the atypical patient. Am J Surg 179:379–381PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Laurell H, Hansson LE, Gunnarsson U (2006) Acute abdominal pain among elderly patients. Gerontology 52:339–344PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wang YC, Yang HR, Chung PK et al (2006) Laparoscopic appendectomy in the elderly. Surg Endosc 20:887–889PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Guller U, Jain N, Peterson ED et al (2004) Laparoscopic appendectomy in the elderly. Surgery 135:479–488PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Galizia G, Prizio G, Lieto E et al (2001) Hemodynamic and pulmonary changes during open, carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum and abdominal wall-lifting cholecystectomy. A prospective, randomized study. Surg Endosc 15:477–483PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gurusamy KS, Samraj K, Davidson BR (2008) Abdominal lift for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD006574Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Boris Kirshtein
    • 1
  • Zvi Howard Perry
    • 1
  • Solly Mizrahi
    • 1
  • Leonid Lantsberg
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Surgery “A”, Soroka Medical Center, Faculty of Health SciencesBen-Gurion University of the NegevBeer-ShevaIsrael

Personalised recommendations