World Journal of Surgery

, Volume 33, Issue 3, pp 577–585

A Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Traditional and Fast-Track Patient Care in Elective Open Infrarenal Aneurysm Repair

  • Bernd Muehling
  • Hubert Schelzig
  • Peter Steffen
  • Rainer Meierhenrich
  • Ludger Sunder-Plassmann
  • Karl-Heinz Orend
Article

Abstract

Background

Fast-track recovery programs have led to reduced patient morbidity and mortality after major surgery. In terms of elective open infrarenal aneurysm repair, no evidence is available about such programs. To address this issue, we have conducted a randomized prospective pilot study.

Methods

The study involved prospective randomization of 101 patients with the indication for elective open aneurysm repair in a traditional and a fast-track treatment arm. The basic fast-track elements were no bowel preparation, reduced preoperative fasting, patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA), enhanced postoperative feeding, and postoperative mobilization. Morbidity and mortality, need for postoperative mechanical ventilation, length of stay (LOS) in the intensive care unit (ICU) and total length of postoperative hospital stay were analyzed in terms of an intention to treat.

Results

Demographic data for the two groups were similar. In the fast-track group the need for postoperative ventilation was significantly lower (6.1% versus 32%; p = 0.002), the median LOS on ICU did not significantly differ (20 h versus 32 h; p = 0.183), full enteral feeding was achieved significantly earlier (5 versus 7 days; p < 0.0001), and the rate of postoperative medical complications—gastrointestinal, cardiac, pulmonary, renal, and infective—was significantly lower (16% versus 36%; p = 0.039). The postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in the fast-track group (10 days versus 11 days; p = 0.016); the mortality rate in both groups was 0%.

Conclusions

An optimized patient care program in open infrarenal aortic aneurysm repair shows favorable results concerning need for postoperative assisted mechanical ventilation, time to full enteral feeding, and incidence of medical complications. Further ranomized multicentric trials are necessary to justify broad implementation (clinical trials. gov identifier NCT 00615888).

References

  1. 1.
    Prinssen M, Verhoeven EL, Buth J, The Dutch Randomized Endovascular Aneurysm Management (DREAM) Trial Group et al (2004) A randomized trial comparing conventional and endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. N Engl J Med 351:1607–1618PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Greenhalgh RM, Brown LC, Kwong GP, The EVAR trial participants et al (2004) Comparison of endovascular aneurysm repair with open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 1), 30-day operative mortality results: randomised controlled trial. Lancet 364:843–848PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ligush J Jr, Pearce JD, Edwards MS et al (2002) Analysis of medical risk factors and outcomes in patients undergoing open versus endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 36:492–499PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Schermerhorn ML, O’Malley AJ, Jhaveri A et al (2008) Endovascular vs. open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms in the Medicare population. N Engl J Med 358:464–474PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brady AR, Fowkes FG, Greenhalgh RM et al (2000) Risk factors for postoperative death following elective surgical repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: results from the UK Small Aneurysm Trial. On behalf of the UK Small Aneurysm Trial participants. Br J Surg 87:742–749PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tang T, Walsh SR, Fanshawe TR et al (2007) Estimation of physiologic ability and surgical stress (E-PASS) as a predictor of immediate outcome after elective abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery. Am J Surg 194:176–182PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hertzer NR, Mascha EJ, Karafa MT et al (2002) Open infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: the Cleveland Clinic experience from 1989 to 1998. J Vasc Surg 35:1145–1154PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fearon KC, Ljungqvist O, Von Meyenfeldt M et al (2005) Enhanced recovery after surgery: a consensus review of clinical care for patients undergoing colonic resection. Clin Nutr 24:466–477 (Review)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kehlet H, Wilmore DW (2002) Multimodal strategies to improve surgical outcome. Am J Surg 183:630–641 (Review)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Anderson AD, McNaught CE, MacFie J et al (2003) Randomized clinical trial of multimodal optimization and standard perioperative surgical care. Br J Surg 90:1497–1504PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gatt M, Anderson AD, Reddy BS et al (2005) Randomized clinical trial of multimodal optimization of surgical care in patients undergoing major colonic resection. Br J Surg 92:1354–1362PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Podore PC, Throop EB (1999) Infrarenal aortic surgery with a 3-day hospital stay: a report on success with a clinical pathway. J Vasc Surg 29:787–792PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Murphy MA, Richards T, Atkinson C et al (2007) Fast track open aortic surgery: reduced post operative stay with a goal directed pathway. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 34:274–278PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bellomo R, Ronco C, Kellum JA, The Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative Workgroup et al (2004) Acute renal failure—definition, outcome measures, animal models, fluid therapy and information technology needs: the Second International Consensus Conference of the Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative (ADQI) Group. Crit Care 8:R204–R212 (Review)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Torsello G, Can A, Schumacher S (2005) Das Bauchaortenaneurysma. Gefäßchirurgie 10:139–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wilmore DW, Kehlet H (2001) Management of patients in fast track surgery. BMJ 322:473–476PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Basse L, Raskov HH, Hjort Jakobsen D et al (2002) Accelerated postoperative recovery programme after colonic resection improves physical performance, pulmonary function and body composition. Br J Surg 89:446–453PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wind J, Polle SW, Fung Kon Jin PH, The Laparoscopy and/or Fast Track Multimodal Management Versus Standard Care (LAFA) Study Group; Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Group et al (2006) Systematic review of enhanced recovery programmes in colonic surgery. Br J Surg 93:800–809 (Review)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Becquemin JP, Chemla E, Chatellier G et al (2000) Preoperative factors influencing the outcome of elective abdominal aorta aneurysm repair. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 20:84–89PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Harris PL, Vallabhaneni SR, Desgranges P et al (2000) Incidence and risk factors of late rupture, conversion, and death after endovascular repair of infrarenal aortic aneurysms: the EUROSTAR experience. European Collaborators on Stent/graft techniques for aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 32:739–749PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ligush J Jr, Pearce JD, Edwards MS et al (2002) Analysis of medical risk factors and outcomes in patients undergoing open versus endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 36:492–499PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Svanfeldt M, Thorell A, Hausel J et al (2005) Effect of “preoperative” oral carbohydrate treatment on insulin action—a randomised cross-over unblinded study in healthy subjects. Clin Nutr 24:815–821PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Frank SM, Fleisher LA, Breslow MJ et al (1997) Perioperative maintenance of normothermia reduces the incidence of morbid cardiac events. A randomized clinical trial. JAMA 277:1127–1134PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bown MJ, Nicholson ML, Bell PR et al (2003) The systemic inflammatory response syndrome, organ failure, and mortality after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 37:600–606PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Liu S, Carpenter RL, Neal JM (1995) Epidural anesthesia and analgesia. Their role in postoperative outcome. Anesthesiology 82:1474–1506 (Review)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kirnö K, Friberg P, Grzegorczyk A et al (1994) Thoracic epidural anesthesia during coronary artery bypass surgery: effects on cardiac sympathetic activity, myocardial blood flow and metabolism, and central hemodynamics. Anesth Analg 79:1075–1081PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kehlet H, Holte K (2002) Epidural anaesthesia and analgesia in major surgery. Lancet 360:568–569 author reply 569PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ballantyne JC, Carr DB, deFerranti S et al (1998) The comparative effects of postoperative analgesic therapies on pulmonary outcome: cumulative meta-analyses of randomized, controlled trials. Anesth Analg 86:598–612PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Umscheid T, Eckstein HH, Noppeney T et al (2000) Qualitätsmanagement Bauchaortenaneurysma er Deutschen Gesellschaft für Gefäßchirurgie (DGG)—Ergebnisse. Gefäßchirurgie 6:194–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Bastounis E, Filis K, Georgopoulos S et al (2003) Selective use of the intensive care unit after elective infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Int Angiol 22:308–316PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Han-Geurts IJ, Hop WC, Kok NF et al (2007) Randomized clinical trial of the impact of early enteral feeding on postoperative ileus and recovery. Br J Surg 94:555–561PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Cambria RP, Brewster DC, Abbott WM et al (1990) Transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal approach for aortic reconstruction: a randomized prospective study. J Vasc Surg 11:314–324 discussion 324–325PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bernd Muehling
    • 1
  • Hubert Schelzig
    • 1
  • Peter Steffen
    • 2
  • Rainer Meierhenrich
    • 3
  • Ludger Sunder-Plassmann
    • 1
  • Karl-Heinz Orend
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Thoracic and Vascular SurgeryUniversity of UlmUlmGermany
  2. 2.Section of Pain ManagementUniversity of UlmUlmGermany
  3. 3.Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care MedicineUniversity of UlmUlmGermany

Personalised recommendations