Results of an Observational Study in Carotid Surgery Using Absorbable Suture Material
- 89 Downloads
- 2 Citations
Abstract
Background
Absorbable sutures are not well accepted for reconstruction in high-pressure arterial segments because the suture line might break and aneurysmal changes could develop. This hypothesis was checked in the clinical setting of carotid surgery.
Methods
The morphology of the carotid artery was evaluated by color-coded ultrasound in four groups of patients: group A, 25 patients who underwent standard carotid endarterectomy and patchplasty, including a transverse plication for which absorbable sutures had been used; group B, 10 patients who underwent eversion endarterectomy and reinsertion using absorbable sutures; group C, 15 patients who underwent standard carotid endarterectomy and patchplasty without a transverse placation; group D, 20 patients who suffered from atherosclerotic disease but did not have previous carotid surgery or other carotid pathology. All operations had been performed at least 3 years earlier than the actual examination.
Results
Along the internal carotid artery, where an aneurysmal change would have been expected to occur, no differences in absolute size or calculated elliptical cross-sectional vessel area were found. Patients after eversion endarterectomy did not show signs of aneurysmal changes in the area of reinsertion at the carotid bifurcation.
Conclusions
Even in the long-term, for this group of patients, no significant aneurysmal changes of arterial reconstructions in carotid surgery performed with absorbable sutures were observed.
Keywords
Internal Carotid Artery Suture Material Absorbable Suture Carotid Bifurcation Anastomotic SiteReferences
- 1.von Segesser LK, Lachat M, Duewell S et al (1996) Improved growth with bioabsorbable sutures in both high- and low-pressure zones. Ann Thorac Surg 62:1045–1049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Gersak B (1991) Comparison between absorbable and nonabsorbable sutures in arterial anastomoses in growing dogs. J Cardiovasc Surg 32:757–760Google Scholar
- 3.Sharp WV, Belden TA, King PH et al (1982) Suture resistance to infection. Surgery 91:61–63PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 4.Molea G, Schonauer F, Bifulco G et al (2000) Comparative study on biocompatibility and absorption times of three absorbable monofilament suture materials (Polydioxanone, Poliglecaprone 25, Glycomer 631). Br J Plast Surg 53:137–141PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Ussia G, Feldmann D, Galletti M et al (1985) Histopathological aspects of tissue reactivity to suture materials in microsurgical arterial, anastomosis. Ital J Surg Sci 15:287–292PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 6.Fried MP, Caminear DS, Sloman-Moll ER (1990) The efficacy of absorbable suture for microvascular anastomoses. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 116:1051–1054PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 7.Schmitz-Rixen T, Horsch S, Klein B et al (1984) Blood vessel wall regeneration in the use of a new monofilament, resorbable suture material for arterial anastomoses. Langenbecks Arch Chir 362:53–60PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Schmitz-Rixen T, Storck M, Erasmi H et al (1991) Vascular anastomoses with absorbable suture material: an experimental study. Ann Vasc Surg 5:257–264PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Merrell SW, Lawrence PF (1991) Initial evaluation of absorbable polydioxanone suture for peripheral vascular surgery. J Vasc Surg 14:452–457PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Thiede A, Lutjohann K, Beck C et al (1979) Absorbable and nonabsorbable sutures in microsurgery: standardized comparable studies in rats. J Microsurg 1:216–222PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Ross G, Pavlides C, Long F et al (1981) Absorbable suture materials for vascular anastomoses. Tensile strength and axial pressure studies using polyglycolic acid sutures. Am Surg 47:541–547Google Scholar
- 12.Verschuere I, Francois K, De Roose J et al (1985) Polydioxanone suture material in growing vascular anastomoses Experimental study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 90:765–770PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 13.Chiu IS, Hung CR, Chao SF et al (1988) Growth of the aortic anastomosis in pigs Comparison of continuous absorbable suture with nonabsorbable suture. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 95:112–118PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 14.Huang GK, Li HQ, Wu XM (1995) Study on microvascular anastomosis of arteries with absorbable polyglyconate suture. Microsurgery 16:505–509PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Aarnio P, Harjula A, Lehtola A et al (1988) Polydioxanone and polypropylene suture material in free internal mammary artery graft anastomoses. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 96:741–745PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 16.Rey AR, Carrillo-Farga J, Velasco CO et al (1990) Use of absorbable sutures in canine carotid arteries. Tex Heart Inst J 17:99–102PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 17.Chang SH, Weng ZC, Yang AH et al (1998) Absorbable PDS-II suture and nonabsorbable polypropylene suture in aortic anastomoses in growing piglets. J Formos Med Assoc 97:165–169PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 18.Pae WE Jr, Waldhausen JA, Prophet GA et al (1981) Primary vascular anastomosis in growing pigs: comparison of polypropylene and polyglycolic acid sutures. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 81:921–927PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 19.Steen S, Andersson L, Lowenhielm P et al (1984) Comparison between absorbable and nonabsorbable, monofilament sutures for end-to-end arterial anastomoses in growing pigs. Surgery 95:202–208PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 20.Torsello GB, Sandmann W, Lenz W et al (1986) Experimental studies with absorbable and nonabsorbable sutures in infected canine arterial anastomoses. J Vasc Surg 3:135–139PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar